Connor Stalions ✓

@cpstalions · joined 07 Sep 2010

@USMC @NavalAcademy ‘17 ⚓️🏈 Watch the film 🎥 Run Fits don’t care about the spread, stats or storyline.

43 693Followers

897Following

10 343Posts total

888.8KViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

Connor Stalions ✓@cpstalions13 Sep

If you exclude 2021 Michigan, 2022 Michigan, 2023 Michigan and 2024 Michigan, is this the worst loss of Ryan Day’s career? Blowing a 20-pt 4th quarter lead is up there with blowing a 50-pt spread. 138.5K views · 5.3K likes · 378 reposts · 88 replies Open on X →

Connor Stalions ✓@cpstalions12 Sep

I can’t believe the refs didn’t conspire to give Oklahoma one more chance at a play with a 1% success rate. 39.4K views · 2K likes · 74 reposts · 18 replies Open on X →

Connor Stalions ✓@cpstalions8 Sep

“We’re appealing because the officials used the correct official clock instead of the incorrect NBC clock to add time after a play that took 8.3 seconds following the referee literally setting the clock to exactly 9 seconds” wouldn’t be compelling in any court. But the NCAA may 275K views · 1.6K likes · 109 reposts · 437 replies Open on X →

Connor Stalions ✓@cpstalions6 Sep

Two things can be true at the same time. • The final second seemed fishy on live TV, but the clock on TV was definitely not at 9.00 seconds prior to the 2nd-to-last play. • The offense has a ton of work to do, but the defense isn’t off the hook. • The defense was great in 116.6K views · 1.7K likes · 92 reposts · 125 replies Open on X →

Connor Stalions ✓@cpstalions6 Sep

Very good explanation here. The referee put 9 seconds on the clock. But NBC’s clock went from 0:09 to 0:08 immediately upon the snap, indicating that either NBC’s clock was off and/or the clock was between 0:08.99 to 0:08.00 while it showed 0:08 on your screen… Which means the 319.3K views · 1.5K likes · 138 reposts · 351 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

5 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de 10K–100K abonnés. diffusé à plus de monde que les comptes de taille comparable.

Vues médianes138 531ce compte1 061médiane pour 10K–100K

Portée, %317.06%ce compte3.72%médiane pour 10K–100K

Engagement, %1.63%ce compte1.65%médiane pour 10K–100K

Indicateur	Ce compte	Médiane pour 10K–100K	Rapport
Vues médianes par post	138 531	1 061	131×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)	3.2× audience	3.72%	85.2×
Taux d'engagement	1.63%	1.65%	0.99×

Autres comptes de cette tranche → Comparer avec un autre compte → Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

319.3K6 Sep

116.6K

275K8 Sep

39.4K12 Sep

138.5K13 Sep

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.61%6 Sep

1.63%

0.77%8 Sep

5.21%12 Sep

4.20%13 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.65%.

What the audience does

Likes83.9%12 025 in total

Reposts5.5%791 in total

Replies7.1%1 019 in total

Bookmarks3.4%491 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.