tweetindex
FR

gary taubes

@garytaubes · Oakland, California · joined 09 Jun 2009

Author of Rethinking Diabetes, The Case for Keto, The Case Against Sugar, Why We Get Fat, Good Calories, Bad Calories, Bad Science, and Nobel Dreams

121 798Followers
503Following
5 112Posts total
210.8KViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

In the past two years, 14 studies have exploited the same remarkable natural experiment: the end of sugar rationing in Britain in 1953. All have come to essentially the same conclusion: greater exposure to sugar early in life is associated with more chronic disease decades https
17.7K views · 249 likes · 52 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →
@garytaubes What about its effects on alcohol, gambling, shopping addiction etc. Isnt that proof its working primarily in the brain? 422 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@garytaubes Not sure about semaglutide or tirzepatide, but retatrutide certainly also increases energy expenditure via glucagon. And it's cheap too, a year's supply is under $300 if you know where to look. https://t.co/yYlfGdT3mD 535 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@garytaubes These drugs in any case greatly reduce appetite, regardless of their supplemental effects 2.1K views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Do GLP-1 drugs work by inhibiting appetite or by prioritizing fat oxidation over storage--changing metabolic fuel partitioning, in the lingo? Most researchers (and X influencers) will insist it's the former, but they'll do so because they don't think deeply about the 45.4K views · 125 likes · 25 reposts · 15 replies Open on X →
Could Wegovy’s weight-lowering effect be caused by how the drug affects fuel metabolism? 1/16 https://t.co/R0FwBnGQFY
30.6K views · 52 likes · 6 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Well, this is nice to see. And from Sam Klein of all people. He was a co-author on two major Atkins studies in the 00s, but seemed to be stumbling blindly over the results. He seems to have his eyes open now. Signs of a paradigm shifting? 17.2K views · 86 likes · 3 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
When we were dating, my engineer now-husband was floored that I didn’t trust Scientific American’s take on nutrition. After we were married my husband adopted Keto and lost his T2 diabetic dawn effect and fatty liver disease. On Keto, eventually his labs made him appear to be 19.5K views · 83 likes · 4 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
I've never been a fan of the American Heart Association's version of the diet-heart hypothesis. But what if they're right? Shouldn't we all work diligently to lower our LDL by diet? Let's work through the numbers and see what we have to gain. If you're curious about how a
15.3K views · 123 likes · 16 reposts · 16 replies Open on X →
@garytaubes Congrats Gary 🙌 568 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@garytaubes @DikemanDave It's the food @garytaubes https://t.co/2IDIDDb2wl
726 views · 14 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@garytaubes Looking forward. We need more books on the subject. Hope you have written about 100 million Indians a number which was < 5 million in 1977. & more than 100 million pre diabetic patients. most doctors still say it’s inherited & not a dietary problem 370 views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
1960: < 2 million Americans with diagnosed diabetes Today: 30 million* Is this a problem that can be solved by drug therapy? There must be a better way My new book, Rethinking Diabetes, is out Jan 2 https://t.co/NaU4gzarCD #diabetes #wefightdiabetes * https://t.co/GtlQ1DvQ5d h
60.4K views · 381 likes · 96 reposts · 34 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

9 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de 100K–1M abonnés. diffusé largement, mais peu de ces spectateurs réagissent.

Vues médianes17 163ce compte5 774médiane pour 100K–1M
Portée, %14.09%ce compte1.51%médiane pour 100K–1M
Engagement, %0.55%ce compte0.97%médiane pour 100K–1M
IndicateurCe compteMédiane pour 100K–1MRapport
Vues médianes par post17 1635 7742.97×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)14.09%1.51%9.33×
Taux d'engagement0.55%0.97%0.56×

Autres comptes de cette tranche →   Comparer avec un autre compte →   Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

60.4K1 Jan
3702 Jan
726
568
15.3K23 Aug
19.5K27 Aug
17.2K28 Aug
30.6K2 Sep
45.4K
2.1K
535
422
17.7K6 Sep

Last 13 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.85%1 Jan
2.16%2 Jan
2.34%
1.23%
1.01%23 Aug
0.47%27 Aug
0.55%28 Aug
0.22%2 Sep
0.36%
0.24%
0.93%
0.95%
1.76%6 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.97%.

What the audience does

Likes66.0%1 140 in total
Reposts11.8%204 in total
Replies5.2%90 in total
Quotes0.3%5 in total
Bookmarks16.6%287 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Comptes similaires