Michael Wang ✓

@miw210

Asian robot

2 914Followers

402Following

1 305Posts total

109.9KViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

Michael Wang ✓@miw21021 Sep

@miw210 @Dweisman13 @WSOP There should be a poker union and poker u ion should demand transparency on tournament buy ins/fees. The first number we see should always be the number that goes to the prize pool in its entirety 2.8K views · 69 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Michael Wang ✓@miw21020 Sep

@blaisebourgeois Also have to call out @AsianPokerTour for doing a bit of the same thing. It's more obvious here than with WSOP, but can we please just list this is a $9,312 + $400 + $288 so no one is confused https://t.co/C0wq2cBDli

2.9K views · 39 likes · 1 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Michael Wang ✓@miw21020 Sep

@blaisebourgeois Most people aren't aware. This is a mistake; rake should always be transparent and obvious. So, at a minimum I think WSOP should relist their buyins with all fees in one line. Ideally, I also think WSOP should lower the rake %s to be closer to their summer levels 3.5K views · 49 likes · 1 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Michael Wang ✓@miw21020 Sep

@blaisebourgeois The fees are not only high compared to industry standards (especially at the higher end of buyins), they're also significantly higher compared with their own events from the summer https://t.co/sHqqXGsKLb

3.3K views · 22 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Michael Wang ✓@miw21020 Sep

@blaisebourgeois Looking at the overall WSOP Paradise series, we see that the fees across the board are a lot higher than immediately apparent. For example, I'm less excited to play a 10k @ 10% rake than @ 5% https://t.co/5eUMcmySg4

3.7K views · 23 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Michael Wang ✓@miw21020 Sep

@blaisebourgeois It wasn't always like this. This is a change from over the summer, where all the buyins were listed correctly, including the staff fee. And the clock listed the correct prize pool https://t.co/aIHdZUyJD6

3.9K views · 23 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Michael Wang ✓@miw21020 Sep

@blaisebourgeois It's easy to see in this Montreal high roller. The buyin is listed as $24,000 + $1,000, and the total prize listed on the clock is listed as $576,000 (24 entries * $24k). But adding up the payouts gets a prize pool of only $558,720. The buyin was really $23,280 +

3.9K views · 23 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Michael Wang ✓@miw21020 Sep

How do I know it works this way? We got a demonstration of it at WSOP Super Circuit Montreal. I was initially made aware of it through an article written by @blaisebourgeois : https://t.co/1Rk5Q2Th6o . The main was indeed not a $4,600 + $400 but a $4,462 + $538 4K views · 25 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Michael Wang ✓@miw21020 Sep

Looking in the app, what would you assume is the portion of this buyin going back to the players? If you thought $25,000, you'd be incorrect. That's because the 4% staff fee at the bottom isn't referring to the $1,000. Instead, it's taken out of the $25,000; it's a $24k+$1k+$1k h

6.3K views · 47 likes · 2 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Michael Wang ✓@miw21020 Sep

The rake at @WSOP Paradise is a lot higher than most people think, because the way that the buyins are listed in the app doesn't reflect an additional 3-5% staff fee. While WSOP technically discloses this fee, it's still not obvious what they're doing (1/x) 75.7K views · 253 likes · 37 reposts · 31 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

10 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de under 10K abonnés. en dessous de ses pairs à la fois en portée et en engagement.

Vues médianes3 773ce compte4 175médiane pour under 10K

Portée, %129.48%ce compte250.82%médiane pour under 10K

Engagement, %0.75%ce compte1.41%médiane pour under 10K

Indicateur	Ce compte	Médiane pour under 10K	Rapport
Vues médianes par post	3 773	4 175	0.90×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)	129.48%	2.5× audience	0.52×
Taux d'engagement	0.75%	1.41%	0.53×

Autres comptes de cette tranche → Comparer avec un autre compte → Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

75.7K20 Sep

6.3K

3.9K

3.7K

3.3K

3.5K

2.9K

2.8K21 Sep

Last 10 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.43%20 Sep

0.83%

0.64%

0.62%

0.67%

0.71%

0.80%

1.56%

1.54%

2.55%21 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.41%.

What the audience does

Likes81.4%573 in total

Reposts6.2%44 in total

Replies7.5%53 in total

Quotes1.3%9 in total

Bookmarks3.6%25 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Derniers posts

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Comptes similaires