tweetindex
FR

Richard Medhurst

@richimedhurst · youtube.com/richardmedhurst · joined 29 Jul 2019

Independent journalist. British 🇬🇧 Based at UN 🇺🇳 Lived around the world 🌍. International affairs, US politics and Middle East. ✉️ richimedhurst@gmail.com

551 161Followers
1 347Following
29 804Posts total
215.1KViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

Many don't know this but the lingua franca of the Persian Empire was actually Aramaic. This is the same Semitic language that Jesus later spoke. A capable interpreter or diplomat during the wars in the Classical Period would've dealt in both Aramaic & Ancient Greek. Fascinating 32.1K views · 266 likes · 44 reposts · 24 replies Open on X →
The interesting part is the Romans didn't execute the Gaul rebels but reintegrated them into the army immediately. Probably less to do with mercy, and more to do with the fact the Empire couldn't afford otherwise. It was in turmoil and had had 4 Emperors that year alone. 24K views · 54 likes · 8 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
@richimedhurst Whoever you are (but definitely not Richard), when are you gonna be done posting ChatGPT created posts? 701 views · 22 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Notice how no stockpiles of chemical weapons were found in Syria since Assad's fall? And that's precisely the point: Arabic countries and their neighbors keep handing over their strategic deterrents on a silver platter, and never learn the lesson that follows. 23.7K views · 501 likes · 84 reposts · 19 replies Open on X →
Yes, they are quite different in many aspects — but the point is that almost every empire in history makes the same argument: "we have come to civilize you/to enlighten you/to bring good". How do we explain the pattern? It's an indictment of human beings more than anything. 13K views · 36 likes · 7 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
Btw do not mistake the Golan for just some barren military zone. It does have settlements there — but you could view that as part of the strategy. As Machiavelli wrote, if you want to keep a piece of land, send colonies because they will hold on to it fiercely for you. So the 13.8K views · 67 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Looking at this through the lens of realpolitik, the Israelis saw a moment of political instability in Syria, and exploited it to expand this buffer zone in the Golan. They didn't like Assad and they don't like or trust Jolani either. So from their POV, the buffer is to put as 11.5K views · 70 likes · 9 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
Israel have held the Syrian Golan Heights since 1967. They saw an opportunity during Assad's fall to destroy Syria's military arsenal (500+ air raids) and took additional territory, twice the size of Gaza, expanding their buffer. The most critical piece of land they took in 32.6K views · 310 likes · 68 reposts · 24 replies Open on X →
@richimedhurst I wouldn't compare the Anglosaxon empire, which is a sea one, and mostly one of pirates, to the Roman one, which was continental and which civilized and integrated the lands it expanded to. 18.4K views · 8 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
The broader lesson is that war and empire are core features of human beings, not an anomaly. They're the norm. You can draw whatever moral and philosophical conclusions you like from that, but the pattern is irrefutable. 6.6K views · 39 likes · 2 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
This takes place almost 2000 years ago. Tacitus recounts how the Romans retook Gaul (France) after a rebellion. A Roman general, Cerialis is addressing the rebels and says: —The Empire gives you stability and security. —It needs your land as a buffer against the Germans. Empire 38.7K views · 101 likes · 12 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

11 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de 100K–1M abonnés. diffusé largement, mais peu de ces spectateurs réagissent.

Vues médianes18 427ce compte4 317médiane pour 100K–1M
Portée, %3.34%ce compte1.68%médiane pour 100K–1M
Engagement, %0.71%ce compte1.35%médiane pour 100K–1M
IndicateurCe compteMédiane pour 100K–1MRapport
Vues médianes par post18 4274 3174.27×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)3.34%1.68%1.99×
Taux d'engagement0.71%1.35%0.53×

Autres comptes de cette tranche →   Comparer avec un autre compte →   Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

38.7K23 Aug
6.6K
18.4K
32.6K
11.5K
13.8K
13K
23.7K
701
24K24 Aug
32.1K

Last 11 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.32%23 Aug
0.71%
0.07%
1.25%
0.74%
0.53%
0.40%
2.56%
3.42%
0.29%24 Aug
1.07%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 1.35%.

What the audience does

Likes74.9%1 474 in total
Reposts12.2%240 in total
Replies5.2%103 in total
Quotes1.3%26 in total
Bookmarks6.4%126 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Comptes similaires