Stephanie Seneff ✓

@stephanieseneff · Princeville, HI · joined 07 Jan 2011

A senior research scientist at MIT and author of the book, Toxic Legacy, which you can order wherever books are sold.

60 562Followers

47Following

5 455Posts total

11.2KViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

Stephanie Seneff ✓@stephanieseneff5 Sep

@stephanieseneff Insurance companies, not big pharma, pays pediatricians for vaccines. You need to think about WHY an insurance company would choose to do that. Think hard! 43 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Stephanie Seneff ✓@stephanieseneff5 Sep

@stephanieseneff It's about social control. https://t.co/AZKJNKYg9F 91 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Stephanie Seneff ✓@stephanieseneff5 Sep

@stephanieseneff 70K Babies born ea week https://t.co/5oJRzHo8Zp 98 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Stephanie Seneff ✓@stephanieseneff5 Sep

"The medical field is just a mess, and pediatrics is probably the worst because they have been paid huge sums of money to vaccinate every one of their precious babies and destroy their future health. If you don’t believe this, search for “vaccination” in my Substack. My evidence 3.3K views · 179 likes · 41 reposts · 13 replies Open on X →

Stephanie Seneff ✓@stephanieseneff5 Sep

@stephanieseneff I would not ask him to review anything. Not even for $1. I would share what Kevin McKernan, Jessica Rose, or Dr Wafik El-Deiry have to say though. I say this as a HER2 triple positive ductal carcinoma cancer survivor. 34 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Stephanie Seneff ✓@stephanieseneff5 Sep

@stephanieseneff Don't give air time to that vile disgusting man. 27 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Stephanie Seneff ✓@stephanieseneff4 Sep

"When a treatment results in acute liver failure and death in multiple children, the only ethical and scientific action is to halt its use entirely until the mechanisms of harm are fully understood; not to layer on more drugs in an attempt to control a known toxicity." 1.5K views · 41 likes · 12 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Stephanie Seneff ✓@stephanieseneff4 Sep

"The harsh reality is this: we are drowning in a sea of pharmaceuticals, pushed upon us by an industry that has long since abandoned its moral compass in pursuit of profit." https://t.co/DpdF05fKSg 1.3K views · 34 likes · 13 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Stephanie Seneff ✓@stephanieseneff4 Sep

It's a question I've pondered. AI technology is a valuable tool for assisting with creative writing, but to what extent should we allow students to use it when they are learning how to writen? https://t.co/c3yUyKeU5A 1.6K views · 8 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Stephanie Seneff ✓@stephanieseneff4 Sep

@stephanieseneff “Dr.” William Makis is a defrocked fraud. He is neither a doctor nor honest. He is, in brief, totally full of shit. https://t.co/cpdH8Pq3QL 352 views · 7 likes · 2 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Stephanie Seneff ✓@stephanieseneff4 Sep

William Makis weighs in on the new turbo cancer paper. “LNP injection triggered acute neutrophil accumulation in the lungs, driven by the release of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) from necrotic muscle cells at the injection site.” https://t.co/siGWGpg4xz 2.8K views · 79 likes · 21 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

11 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de 10K–100K abonnés. touche moins de monde que ses pairs, mais les engage bien davantage.

Vues médianes352ce compte924médiane pour 10K–100K

Portée, %0.58%ce compte3.62%médiane pour 10K–100K

Engagement, %3.57%ce compte1.52%médiane pour 10K–100K

Indicateur	Ce compte	Médiane pour 10K–100K	Rapport
Vues médianes par post	352	924	0.38×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)	0.58%	3.62%	0.16×
Taux d'engagement	3.57%	1.52%	2.35×

Autres comptes de cette tranche → Comparer avec un autre compte → Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

2.8K4 Sep

352

1.6K

1.3K

1.5K

275 Sep

3.3K

Last 11 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

4.05%4 Sep

3.41%

0.63%

3.83%

3.57%

18.52%5 Sep

5.88%

7.15%

1.02%

2.20%

2.33%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes67.8%358 in total

Reposts17.0%90 in total

Replies6.4%34 in total

Quotes0.9%5 in total

Bookmarks7.8%41 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Derniers posts

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Comptes similaires