Brad Porter ✓

@BradPorter_ · joined 22 Jun 2017

Founder and CEO, Collaborative Robotics. I post about engineering leadership, AI, and robotics. Formerly CTO Scale AI, VP of Robotics at Amazon.

123 608Followers

947Following

2 505Posts total

4.8MViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

Brad Porter ✓@BradPorter_13 Sep

This is a very thoughtful take that cuts through the BS incentives around the hype. 3.6K views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Brad Porter ✓@BradPorter_10 Sep

Erik Nieves has deployed industrial robots for 35 years. Two billion picks. 200+ deployments. When Figure live-streamed a humanoid doing parcel induction at 1,200 per hour, he set up his own stream to show what real entitlement looks like. 2,200 to 2,400. Bulk flow. Full SKU htt

0:43

3.8K views · 22 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Brad Porter ✓@BradPorter_25 Aug

The best case for wheels I've heard came from the guy who has taught legged locomotion at MIT for 20 years. AMR safety cases assume you slow proportional to distance and come to rest. A balancing biped may need to take steps to stop. The safety zone explodes and the robot ends h

0:50

8.2K views · 11 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Brad Porter ✓@BradPorter_19 Aug

With new robots like Sunday’s Memo and Genesis Eno, the Overton window on what qualifies as a “humanoid” has shifted. Where does that leave a human-capable robot like Cobot’s Proxie? 4.4K views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Brad Porter ✓@BradPorter_23 Jun

@BradPorter_ 🔥🔥🔥🔥 1.5K views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Brad Porter ✓@BradPorter_23 Jun

@BradPorter_ Wow, that is a BORING robot! 😴 It's also exactly what we need more of. Physics doesn't generalize, so domain specific machines are the way 🤗 2.3K views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Brad Porter ✓@BradPorter_23 Jun

@BradPorter_ 🦾 945 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Brad Porter ✓@BradPorter_23 Jun

Today we introduce Proxie Gen2 to the world. At Cobot we have set out to build something that didn't exist: a robot that moves through real environments and manipulates real objects, autonomously, alongside real people. That's compounding advantage. More on our vision here 4.8M views · 501 likes · 53 reposts · 35 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

8 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 100K–1M pengikut. tampil luas, tetapi sedikit penonton yang merespons.

Median tayangan3 679akun ini5 986median untuk 100K–1M

Jangkauan, %2.98%akun ini1.60%median untuk 100K–1M

Interaksi, %0.17%akun ini1.04%median untuk 100K–1M

Metrik	Akun ini	Median untuk 100K–1M	Rasio
Median tayangan per postingan	3 679	5 986	0.61×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)	2.98%	1.60%	1.86×
Tingkat interaksi	0.17%	1.04%	0.17×

Akun lain pada rentang ini → Bandingkan dengan akun lain → Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

4.8M23 Jun

945

2.3K

1.5K

4.4K19 Aug

8.2K25 Aug

3.8K10 Sep

3.6K13 Sep

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.01%23 Jun

0.21%

0.18%

0.13%

0.23%19 Aug

0.17%25 Aug

0.58%10 Sep

0.08%13 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 1.04%.

What the audience does

Likes68.5%551 in total

Reposts6.6%53 in total

Replies5.2%42 in total

Bookmarks19.7%158 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Postingan terbaru

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Akun serupa