Cammie
@CammieMcManus97
RT not endorsements
1 085Followers
1 331Following
4 912Posts total
72.3KViews on collected posts
Postingan terbaru
Mencari postingan baru…
@CammieMcManus97 @WomenOScotland @ForWomenScot
How very SNP.
381 views · 7 likes
· 0 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
I supplied evidence.
I answered the questions put to me.
I expected the truth — including the uncomfortable parts — to be confronted.
2.4K views · 3 likes
· 1 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
The same political organisation which previously sought to portray those speaking out about Linden as troublemakers is now once again attempting to control the story.
I went into this process in good faith.
I’ve ran out of space for my full statement find the rest posted above
1.1K views · 46 likes
· 3 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Neither should the SNP be allowed to cherry-pick the parts of Professor Malone’s work that suit its political narrative while ignoring the findings that expose serious failures within the Group.
1K views · 24 likes
· 1 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
I do not accept that this amounts to the complete exoneration now being claimed.
1K views · 20 likes
· 1 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
The SNP is asking the public to accept that, on the balance of probabilities, Carragher’s account should prevail despite the changes in her position, the surrounding evidence and the wider conduct revealed during this affair.
1K views · 21 likes
· 1 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
And the public record is that Professor Malone did not conclude that I fabricated a complaint.
He accepted that I may genuinely have intended and believed that I was making one.
There is another uncomfortable point.
1.1K views · 19 likes
· 1 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
The public record is that the independent review found significant failures in the disciplinary processes used against members of the Group.
1.1K views · 18 likes
· 1 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
The public record is that Carragher’s explanation of the July 2022 meeting changed.
The public record includes recordings in which Linden and the allegations surrounding him were, in my view, repeatedly minimised or defended.
1.1K views · 23 likes
· 2 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
The public record is that Carragher later appeared as a defence witness for Linden.
The public record is that Greg Lennon was suspended while Paul Di Mascio and David Crichton were expelled.
1.1K views · 22 likes
· 1 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
The North Lanarkshire SNP statement says it now wants to “correct the public record”.
Good.
Then let us correct the entire record.
The public record is that Jordan Linden was convicted.
The public record is that concerns were raised long before that conviction.
1.2K views · 35 likes
· 4 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Why was Linden not administratively suspended pending investigation when the SNP Councillor Handbook expressly provided that option?
Why were people raising concerns disciplined instead?
Why was discussion about Linden’s alleged conduct restricted?
1.9K views · 33 likes
· 3 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Why were procedures used against members who attempted to challenge what was happening?
And why, after Linden was ultimately convicted of serious sexual offences, is the priority once again to attack or diminish the credibility of those who raised concerns?
1.3K views · 27 likes
· 3 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
The review itself identified serious procedural shortcomings in how those disciplinary processes were handled.
That raises a question the SNP still refuses to answer:
1.3K views · 20 likes
· 1 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Instead:
Greg Lennon was suspended.
Paul Di Mascio was expelled.
David Crichton was expelled.
Disciplinary action was directed towards people challenging what had happened, while the individual at the centre of the allegations remained politically protected.
1.4K views · 36 likes
· 6 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
And while all of this was happening, what happened to the people who raised concerns?
Jordan Linden was not suspended from the Council Group pending investigation.
1.4K views · 26 likes
· 1 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
She subsequently gave evidence for Linden during his criminal proceedings.
These are not insignificant details when the SNP is asking the public to accept that the entire controversy surrounding her actions amounted to nothing more than an innocent misunderstanding.
1.5K views · 32 likes
· 3 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Those recordings exist.
They should be listened to alongside the public statements now being made.
Carragher was also photographed socially with Linden at the SNP Group Christmas night out and, according to evidence I provided, spoke about Linden returning to the Group.
1.6K views · 24 likes
· 2 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
I raised concerns about Carragher’s own conduct and involvement.
There are also multiple recordings involving Carragher and other senior figures which, in my view, show Linden’s behaviour and the concerns surrounding him being minimised, dismissed or defended.
1.7K views · 24 likes
· 2 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
People can make their own judgement about that.
There is also evidence that cannot simply be wished away.
I provided material concerning Councillors Masterton and Sullivan which, in my view, demonstrates that other SNP councillors were aware that I had raised concerns in July22
1.8K views · 27 likes
· 4 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Then the argument became that the meeting happened but that what I said did not constitute a complaint requiring action.
Her account has therefore materially shifted during this affair.
2K views · 24 likes
· 2 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Yet despite those changes, despite the evidence I provided, and despite the review itself accepting that I may genuinely have believed I was making a complaint, the SNP has somehow decided that the “balance of probability” falls entirely in Carragher’s favour.
1.9K views · 25 likes
· 2 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Let us remember how Carragher’s position developed.
At the beginning of this scandal, the public position was effectively that there had been no such meeting concerning a complaint.
Then the meeting was accepted.
2.1K views · 23 likes
· 4 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
He describes the possibility of a “genuine misunderstanding.”
That is not a finding that I lied.
It is not a finding that I invented the meeting.
It is not a finding that nothing was raised about Linden.
And it certainly does not justify the victory lap we are now witnessing
3.1K views · 32 likes
· 3 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
That is not what Professor Malone’s finding says.
His report accepts that it may have been my intention and understanding that I was making a complaint, but concludes that I did not make sufficiently clear that I wanted Cllr Carragher to commence a formal complaints process.
2.4K views · 27 likes
· 3 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
and what happened to those of us who tried to speak out.
Having now seen the statement issued by the North Lanarkshire SNP Group, I cannot stay silent while they attempt to rewrite history.
Councillor Tracy Carragher is now publicly presenting herself as having been “cleared”.
4.9K views · 62 likes
· 11 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
I entered the SNP’s so called independent review in good faith.
I did so because, after everything that happened surrounding Jordan Linden, I believed there would finally be an honest examination of what I raised, what senior members of the North Lanarkshire SNP Group knew, http
28.2K views · 150 likes
· 77 reposts · 10 replies
Open on X →
Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama
28 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang under 10K pengikut. menjangkau lebih sedikit orang, tetapi melibatkan mereka jauh lebih kuat.
Median tayangan1 410akun ini3 853median untuk under 10K
Jangkauan, %129.91%akun ini276.55%median untuk under 10K
Interaksi, %1.85%akun ini1.47%median untuk under 10K
| Metrik | Akun ini | Median untuk under 10K | Rasio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median tayangan per postingan | 1 410 | 3 853 | 0.37× |
| Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut) | 129.91% | 2.8× audience | 0.47× |
| Tingkat interaksi | 1.85% | 1.47% | 1.26× |
Akun lain pada rentang ini → Bandingkan dengan akun lain → Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →
Growth & engagement
How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.
Views per post
1.3K25 Aug
1.9K
1.2K
1.1K
1.1K
1.1K
1.1K
1K
1K
1K
1.1K
2.4K
1.3K
38126 Aug
Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.
Engagement rate per post
2.47%25 Aug
1.91%
3.25%
2.15%
2.27%
1.86%
2.00%
2.24%
2.17%
2.53%
4.67%
0.21%
0.63%
1.84%26 Aug
Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.47%.
What the audience does
Likes80.1%836 in total
Reposts13.9%145 in total
Replies3.4%35 in total
Bookmarks2.7%28 in total
Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.
The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.
Akun serupa
Daniel ✓
@0xDani
2.2K followers
· 8.6K posts
マウンテン池藤
@uwuBN5b6rGzrUcs
2.2K followers
· 136.9K posts
🍣👟
@Sushishoes1
2.2K followers
· 156.6K posts
Yo ya nací cerrista!!
@elgo7682
2.2K followers
· 30.4K posts
Vineer ✓
@vineerpasam
2.2K followers
· 12.6K posts
Please show mercy to communism terrorism victims
@zilinda_zi
2.2K followers
· 74.2K posts
Alpha Arena ✓
@AlphaArena_2026
2.2K followers
· 171 posts
MTP
@marytylerpoor
2.2K followers
· 57.1K posts