Carnegie Democracy

@CarnegieDCG · Washington, DC · joined 20 May 2014

The Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program @CarnegieEndow conducts independent analysis on global policy, polarization, tech, equality & more. RT≠endorse

11 163Followers

482Following

12 588Posts total

687Views on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

Carnegie Democracy@CarnegieDCG10 Sep

🆕| How should nonprofits adapt to a changing media landscape? @noUpside, @RachelKleinfeld , and Margot Treadwell offer a strategic guide for how organizations can remain relevant and influential.👇 https://t.co/bLnAnhBOZy 88 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Carnegie Democracy@CarnegieDCG4 Sep

🆕| What does “AI sovereignty” mean in practice? @1lucabelli argues that technological self-sufficiency is unrealistic for most countries. Instead, governments should build sovereign capacity around three pillars: agency, interoperability, and openness.👇 https://t.co/KAJGfIay1x 129 views · 1 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Carnegie Democracy@CarnegieDCG3 Sep

🆕How can opposition parties push back against democratic backsliding? Drawing on cases from Poland, Moldova, Serbia, and Turkey, @jlynnmccoy and @murat_somer_eng examine what works in resisting authoritarian tendencies and building democratic resilience👇 https://t.co/XPcsfCF1Nl 146 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Carnegie Democracy@CarnegieDCG2 Sep

Great powers are no longer the only actors with access to drone technology. Read more in this excerpt in @BulletinAtomic from @SteveJFeldstein's forthcoming book, Bytes and Bullets, to be published on September 8th👇 https://t.co/wVAmmqpXgO 146 views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Carnegie Democracy@CarnegieDCG27 Aug

🆕| Rising domestic and regional tensions are putting the endurance of the Pretoria Agreement under strain and raising the risk of regional fallout, writes Lesley Anne Warner. Read her latest for @just_security⬇️ https://t.co/TdVz60CBLT 178 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

5 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 10K–100K pengikut. menjangkau lebih sedikit orang dibanding akun seukurannya.

Median tayangan146akun ini924median untuk 10K–100K

Jangkauan, %1.31%akun ini3.62%median untuk 10K–100K

Interaksi, %0.00%akun ini1.52%median untuk 10K–100K

Metrik	Akun ini	Median untuk 10K–100K	Rasio
Median tayangan per postingan	146	924	0.16×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)	1.31%	3.62%	0.36×
Tingkat interaksi	0.00%	1.52%	0.00×

Akun lain pada rentang ini → Bandingkan dengan akun lain → Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

17827 Aug

1462 Sep

1463 Sep

1294 Sep

8810 Sep

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.00%27 Aug

2.05%2 Sep

0.00%3 Sep

1.55%4 Sep

0.00%10 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes42.9%3 in total

Reposts28.6%2 in total

Bookmarks28.6%2 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.