tweetindex
ID

Dr. Daniel Grossman

@DrDGrossman · joined 15 Nov 2016

Clinical & public health researcher on abortion & contraception. MD. @ANSIRH Director. @UCSFBixby faculty. @IbisRH Sr Advisor. Tweets not affiliated with UCSF.

20 143Followers
354Following
10 429Posts total
4.1KViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

Tierra Walker should still be here. Tierra Walker should have been able to get lifesaving abortion care in Texas. It is no exaggeration to say that abortion bans endanger the lives of every pregnant person in states with these laws. https://t.co/FUtA9AFQd4 407 views · 16 likes · 5 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Well, this is certainly a. . . creative. . . disinformation strategy from the anti-abortion politicians who will try ANYTHING to restrict abortion access. No, the scientific evidence does not support claims that mifepristone poses an environmental risk. https://t.co/8Lq6FsRj3u 488 views · 17 likes · 6 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
@DrDGrossman Not even close to being true. 84% of women reported significant negative emotional or mental health reactions from the abortions. https://t.co/jMtzovimrq 463 views · 33 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Another study recently joined the large body of rigorous scientific research demonstrating that abortion — including medication abortion — is not associated with negative mental health effects: https://t.co/SSXzwC4xZ2 697 views · 19 likes · 9 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Reminder: The actual scientific evidence strongly supports removing the existing restrictions on mifepristone and expanding access to medication abortion, NOT adding more barriers. Read more: https://t.co/YBFWqH7VKC 2.1K views · 75 likes · 37 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
To be clear: Abortion is NOT an elective medical procedure. It's essential healthcare and must be available during the pandemic. It can't be delayed. Patients can't wait until an undetermined later date to get an abortion. We need to make access available throughout the pandemic. 0 views · 26.5K likes · 5.2K reposts · 610 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

5 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 10K–100K pengikut. menjangkau lebih sedikit orang, tetapi melibatkan mereka jauh lebih kuat.

Median tayangan488akun ini924median untuk 10K–100K
Jangkauan, %2.42%akun ini3.62%median untuk 10K–100K
Interaksi, %5.33%akun ini1.52%median untuk 10K–100K
MetrikAkun iniMedian untuk 10K–100KRasio
Median tayangan per postingan4889240.53×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)2.42%3.62%0.67×
Tingkat interaksi5.33%1.52%3.50×

Akun lain pada rentang ini →   Bandingkan dengan akun lain →   Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

2.1K10 Sep
69714 Sep
463
48815 Sep
40717 Sep

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

5.41%10 Sep
4.16%14 Sep
7.78%
5.33%15 Sep
5.16%17 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes69.0%160 in total
Reposts25.9%60 in total
Replies1.7%4 in total
Quotes0.4%1 in total
Bookmarks3.0%7 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Akun serupa