tweetindex
ID

Harvard Law Review

@HarvLRev · Cambridge, MA, USA · joined 06 Apr 2009

Independent journal of legal scholarship, published and edited by students since 1887.

46 965Followers
373Following
2 664Posts total
16.1KViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

@HarvLRev @ketanrama @mvadams12 This comprehensive legal dossier—detailing a potential large-scale, multi-year judicial RICO case—how the San Joaquin Superior Court, Sacramento Superior Court, and the Third District Court of Appeal weaponized a nonexistent, void juvenile dependen 6 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@HarvLRev @tannerallread I am one of the Whistleblowers! I NEED TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY. Please help me find one! https://t.co/wNCVTbPXbd https://t.co/Y4x7FZS00F Late Dave Frohnmayer was the one who started & initiated the fraud of Foreclosed houses & taking over our homes! 0 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
And the second is “Who Decides How to Decarbonize? Environmental Justice and Democratic Decisionmaking in California Climate Regulations” by Law Review Fellow Amelia Keyes (https://t.co/Ngj72FN2Uu). 443 views · 4 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
In addition, the Forum published two new Essays this month. The first is “The U.S. Supreme Court and the ‘Inferior’ Courts: Siblings or Distant Cousins?” by retired Judge Diane P. Wood (https://t.co/Ngj72FN2Uu). 498 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Chapter One explored the "history and tradition" of substantive due process in state constitutions (https://t.co/MZhnahwXlj). Chapter Two detailed the enforcement of state constitutions through constitutional torts (https://t.co/xJnevRLTM2). 92 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Chapter Three discussed the decline and fall of the state executive council as a widespread institution (https://t.co/JO9CGaa0rY), and Chapter Four explored home rule and the balance of power between states and municipalities (https://t.co/TF4U5GaruC). 73 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
It also featured a review of Professor @Akhil_Reed_Amar’s book, Born Equal, by Professor Evan D. Bernick (https://t.co/M4N3sfgiLn). 497 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The April issue is a special one for student writing, including four brand-new chapters of our “Developments in the Law” series. This year, the series focused on state constitutional law. 217 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
This month, we published Issue 6 of Volume 139 at https://t.co/HAaqP0lqff! Our April print edition feature a @tannerallread article titled “Indigenous Constitutionalism" (https://t.co/q4qGHq0EpT). 4.4K views · 21 likes · 6 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
March's HLR Forum is live at https://t.co/zjL3o4UNjA! It features essays from Michael Dreeben and Hagan Scotten on the continued relevance of Justice Robert Jackson's famous address, "The Federal Prosecutor." 3.6K views · 12 likes · 9 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Professor Jonathan Glater explains the federal law surrounding university accreditation and its relationship to recent events. Read "Controlling Higher Education Through Accreditation” here: https://t.co/IZSXxnfffU. 1.1K views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Issue 5 is now live at https://t.co/Dxicci6byj! This issue features What is a Tort? by Prof. @ketanrama; a review by Prof. Jonathan Glater of Prof. @mvadams12's The Containment; five student notes; and three student case comments. 3.9K views · 14 likes · 10 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
We are excited to publish two new pieces on the Forum! Professor Hiroshi Motomura has written a Response to “Federalism and the New National Security.” Read “The New National Security and the Old Federalism: Finding a Path Forward”:   https://t.co/TWgOnG7oVH 1.2K views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

1 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 10K–100K pengikut. menjangkau lebih sedikit orang dibanding akun seukurannya.

Median tayangan6akun ini1 004median untuk 10K–100K
Jangkauan, %0.01%akun ini3.97%median untuk 10K–100K
Interaksi, %0.00%akun ini1.55%median untuk 10K–100K
MetrikAkun iniMedian untuk 10K–100KRasio
Median tayangan per postingan61 0040.01×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)0.01%3.97%0.00×
Tingkat interaksi0.00%1.55%0.00×

Akun lain pada rentang ini →   Bandingkan dengan akun lain →   Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.2K21 Feb
3.9K12 Mar
1.1K14 Mar
3.6K28 Mar
4.4K21 Apr
217
497
73
92
498
443
67 Sep

Last 12 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.66%21 Feb
0.66%12 Mar
0.45%14 Mar
0.62%28 Mar
0.77%21 Apr
0.46%
0.80%
2.74%
2.17%
1.00%
1.35%
0.00%7 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.55%.

What the audience does

Likes51.9%70 in total
Reposts20.0%27 in total
Replies11.1%15 in total
Quotes2.2%3 in total
Bookmarks14.8%20 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Akun serupa