tweetindex
ID

Oscar ✓

@HeyOscarx

Empowering Growth Through AI • Practical Strategies, Powerful Tools & Real-World Solutions • DM for collab or 📧 oscaraix01@gmail.com

1 449Followers
6Following
476Posts total
1.3MViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

@HeyOscarx 60 Minutes did a story on the monopoly Luxottica enjoys, back when 60 Minutes actually did investigative journalism. 5K views · 193 likes · 9 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
He said the last thing — and the one that ties everything together — is that the glasses industry survives on one thing: your belief that glasses are supposed to be expensive. "They're not. They never were. The raw materials cost less than your morning coffee. The manufacturing 26.6K views · 441 likes · 88 reposts · 30 replies Open on X →
He said the ninth thing most people never consider is that the lens upgrades your optometrist pushes are the highest-margin upsells in the entire transaction — and most of them are available online for 80% less. When you buy glasses at a retail optical shop, the frame is just 27.3K views · 177 likes · 23 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
He said the seventh thing — and the part where the thread shifts from problem to solution — is that alternatives exist. Real alternatives. And they cost 70–90% less. He said the glasses monopoly feels inescapable because EssilorLuxottica controls the traditional retail channel. 31.1K views · 349 likes · 55 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
He said the eighth thing most people get wrong is thinking online glasses can't be as good as optometrist-dispensed glasses. He said they're functionally identical — if you know your prescription and your measurements. The most common objection to buying glasses online is: "But 29.1K views · 243 likes · 27 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
He said the sixth thing most people don't know is that independent optometrists are often trapped inside the same system — and many of them know it. Most people assume their local eye doctor is an independent business offering unbiased recommendations. He said many independent 31.4K views · 155 likes · 15 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
He said the fourth thing most people don't know is that your "luxury" designer glasses were made on the same production line as every other pair — and the designer never touched them. Most people who buy Prada glasses, Chanel sunglasses, or Versace frames believe they're buying 37K views · 180 likes · 26 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
He said the fifth thing most people don't know is that lenses — the part that actually corrects your vision — cost almost nothing to produce. Most people assume the lenses in their glasses are the expensive component — the precision-ground, medically calibrated optics that 33.5K views · 172 likes · 33 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
He said the third thing most people don't understand is the insurance trap — because the company that makes your glasses also owns the insurance company that tells you where to buy them. EssilorLuxottica owns EyeMed — one of the largest vision insurance providers in the United 42.8K views · 236 likes · 48 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
He said the first thing most people don't realize is that EssilorLuxottica isn't a big company. It's the entire industry — pretending to be hundreds of separate companies. EssilorLuxottica is a Franco-Italian conglomerate with nearly $29 billion in annual revenue, over 200,000 61.5K views · 337 likes · 54 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
He said the second thing most people don't know is how Luxottica crushed the only brand that tried to fight them — and it's the most important story in the industry. In the early 2000s, Oakley was one of the most valuable independent eyewear brands in the world. Athletes wore 52K views · 275 likes · 43 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Your glasses cost $5 to make. You paid $300. And one company you've never heard of is the reason why. Luxottica owns Ray-Ban. They own Oakley. They own Persol. They own Oliver Peoples. They own Costa. They own Arnette. They make the glasses for Prada, Chanel, Versace, Dolce & 897.4K views · 5.6K likes · 1.8K reposts · 245 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

12 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang under 10K pengikut. tampil luas, tetapi sedikit penonton yang merespons.

Median tayangan32 467akun ini4 175median untuk under 10K
Jangkauan, %2240.65%akun ini250.82%median untuk under 10K
Interaksi, %0.70%akun ini1.41%median untuk under 10K
MetrikAkun iniMedian untuk under 10KRasio
Median tayangan per postingan32 4674 1757.78×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)22.4× audience2.5× audience8.93×
Tingkat interaksi0.70%1.41%0.50×

Akun lain pada rentang ini →   Bandingkan dengan akun lain →   Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

897.4K5 Sep
52K
61.5K
42.8K
33.5K
37K
31.4K
29.1K
31.1K
27.3K
26.6K
5K

Last 12 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.87%5 Sep
0.62%
0.64%
0.67%
0.63%
0.56%
0.54%
0.95%
1.32%
0.74%
2.12%
4.08%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.41%.

What the audience does

Likes50.5%8 309 in total
Reposts13.7%2 251 in total
Replies1.8%302 in total
Quotes1.1%185 in total
Bookmarks32.8%5 397 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Akun serupa