tweetindex
ID

Hudson Institute ✓

@HudsonInstitute · Washington, DC · joined 14 Oct 2008

Promoting American leadership for a secure, free, and prosperous future.

126 491Followers
3 700Following
21 108Posts total
93.6KViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

Central Asia is rapidly becoming one of the most important centers of global geopolitics. Watch @kenmoriyasu and @RepJimmyPanetta discuss how expanded US engagement in Central Asia can help counter China's global economic influence, reduce Russia's energy leverage over Europe, 2.7K views · 13 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
https://t.co/DiYAQy1rih 2.2K views · 8 likes · 4 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
On @FoxNews, @RLHeinrichs breaks down the ongoing economic pressure on Iran and notes that it will limit the Islamic Republic's ability to reconstitute its forces and pay its soldiers. https://t.co/1c38dtGifv 3.5K views · 25 likes · 12 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@HudsonInstitute You’re right that inventory is only the opening hand. Replacement time is the real staying power. @SecWar @PeteHegseth deserves tremendous credit for getting the model right. Signal steady demand. Increase competition with new entrants. Support surge capacity 606 views · 45 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@HudsonInstitute Model on drug patent model, but shorten it to 7 years. After 7 years of profit, DPA makes all designs generic, so they can be cheaply mass produced by partner manufacturers in exchange for tax credits. Raytheon etc would still be rich, but unit/$ would skyrocket. 246 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@HudsonInstitute https://t.co/QkZO64LinG 487 views · 6 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
The munitions shortfall is more complex than industrial failure. It resulted from several interdependent factors: — unstable defense budgets — overly optimistic assumptions about how long wars will last — shrinking production capacity — restrictions on allied manufacturing https 83.9K views · 146 likes · 45 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

7 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 100K–1M pengikut. tepat di median untuk rentang pengikutnya.

Median tayangan2 189akun ini5 983median untuk 100K–1M
Jangkauan, %1.73%akun ini1.49%median untuk 100K–1M
Interaksi, %0.81%akun ini0.93%median untuk 100K–1M
MetrikAkun iniMedian untuk 100K–1MRasio
Median tayangan per postingan2 1895 9830.37×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)1.73%1.49%1.16×
Tingkat interaksi0.81%0.93%0.88×

Akun lain pada rentang ini →   Bandingkan dengan akun lain →   Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

83.9K31 Aug
487
2461 Sep
606
3.5K2 Sep
2.2K
2.7K

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.24%31 Aug
1.44%
0.81%1 Sep
7.76%
1.06%2 Sep
0.69%
0.70%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes62.5%245 in total
Reposts17.3%68 in total
Replies2.8%11 in total
Quotes2.0%8 in total
Bookmarks15.3%60 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Akun serupa

Frequently asked questions about @HudsonInstitute

How many followers does @HudsonInstitute have?

126 491 followers.

How many posts has @HudsonInstitute published?

21 108 posts.

How do posts by @HudsonInstitute perform?

Collected posts: 7. Views: 93 595. Likes: 245.