tweetindex
ID

JMToWin

@JMToWin · joined 05 Sep 2014

founder/developer OWS || high-stakes DFS champion (Thunderdome, Luxury Box, Game Changer, Wildcat, King of the Hill/Beach, Spy, etc.) || we’ll teach you to fish

25 030Followers
410Following
11 770Posts total
68.7KViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

Here's my personal "Tier 3" for this week. This is my tiers of players who have a shot at being difference-making on the slate, ranked by likelihood. Tiers 1 & 2 are A) much smaller, and are B) in my journal. Time to build! https://t.co/HIqJEfyVr4
7.7K views · 36 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@JMToWin Yeah but you have to play 2-3 other receivers. They can’t all be paired with a qb. 424 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
https://t.co/PHu0zQPag9
GIF
6K views · 15 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@JMToWin A receiver can get there on something like 10 catches 130 yards and 0 TDs while their QB goes under their average 796 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@JMToWin Vikings Bears is my Uncle game 7.6K views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
In DFS, people often play a wide receiver naked, when that wide receiver hitting “a tourney-winner” would almost certainly mean their QB is hitting a tourney winner as well. “If you get this WR spot right, you’re also getting his QB right. So you should turn the math in your htt
24.2K views · 63 likes · 3 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →
7 of the Commanders’ first 8 drop-backs on 1st & 10 yielded negative EPA in Week 1. I’m finally getting around to watching this game. If the Commanders/Cowboys game goes wrong, this is one place where it happens: bad first-down play design and decision-making putting Washington 5.2K views · 23 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@JMToWin Congratulations 63 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@JMToWin Killer LUs! 2K views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Must be that time of year! https://t.co/CzINZx402a
14.6K views · 70 likes · 1 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

10 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 10K–100K pengikut. tampil luas, tetapi sedikit penonton yang merespons.

Median tayangan5 634akun ini914median untuk 10K–100K
Jangkauan, %22.51%akun ini3.38%median untuk 10K–100K
Interaksi, %0.24%akun ini1.53%median untuk 10K–100K
MetrikAkun iniMedian untuk 10K–100KRasio
Median tayangan per postingan5 6349146.16×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)22.51%3.38%6.66×
Tingkat interaksi0.24%1.53%0.16×

Akun lain pada rentang ini →   Bandingkan dengan akun lain →   Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

14.6K14 Sep
2K
63
5.2K17 Sep
24.2K19 Sep
7.6K
796
6K
424
7.7K20 Sep

Last 10 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.51%14 Sep
0.15%
0.00%
0.46%17 Sep
0.32%19 Sep
0.12%
0.13%
0.25%
0.24%
0.49%20 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.53%.

What the audience does

Likes76.0%218 in total
Reposts1.4%4 in total
Replies6.3%18 in total
Quotes1.0%3 in total
Bookmarks15.3%44 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Akun serupa