tweetindex
ID

Jack Watling

@Jack_Watling · joined 22 May 2011

Senior Research Fellow - Applied Military Sciences, @RUSI_org; PhD History. Opinions my own.

55 808Followers
1 292Following
13 170Posts total
382.4KViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

An opportunity to join the Mil Sci team at @RUSI_org. 8.1K views · 25 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
#HIRING We are recruiting a Research Analyst - Military Technology to join our Military Sciences Research Group in London. This early-career role focuses on intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR), space, and the technologies shaping the future of defence. You'll ht
13K views · 23 likes · 7 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@Jack_Watling @RUSI_org The reform aspect indeed has more to do with matters of principle. His relentless approach to the system also made it a matter of (his) personality, as many in the "old" guard - including, reportedly, Yermak - rallied around his removal. Syrskyi was one ju 7K views · 25 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@Jack_Watling @Justin_Br0nk @RUSI_org Immensely informative. In your opinion who would be the person(s) to lead AFU & embrace the reforms Fedorov was working for? 3.5K views · 15 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@Jack_Watling @RUSI_org Agreed with your assessment. There had been prior efforts to raise concerns about Syrskyi, but it's notable that it took him de facto refusing civilian direction that forced the issue. 3.2K views · 19 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Reluctantly, I offer some context for @RUSI_org on the recent removal of Minister Fedorov and the challenge of reform for the Ukrainian military: https://t.co/AtjhV4csDP 169.5K views · 705 likes · 236 reposts · 27 replies Open on X →
@Jack_Watling Yep. His analysis has never been great tbh. This is just fantasy. 3.6K views · 48 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
It's a bit like Whiplash spending time with Ukrainian units who desperately wish they were supported by decent numbers of modern combat aircraft as it would genuinely solve so many tactical problems, while commentators advocate swapping these for slow, low payload munitions. 36.2K views · 337 likes · 39 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →
Which does not obviate the need for the British Army to acquire large numbers of UAVs and to fight differently. That is true. But how drones integrate with other arms needs to be grounded in facts, not fiction. Otherwise we risk throwing away advantages. 2/2 9.4K views · 176 likes · 12 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
This is dangerously wrong: https://t.co/2Ra7lfGo7M The UK does not (though Ukraine wishes it did) produce 500k shells a year. Drones are not responsible for 96% of Russian KIA 5k British troops were not wiped out by 4 UAV operators. Garbage data in = bad conclusions out 1/2 59K views · 491 likes · 99 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →
Always fun bouncing idea around with Sir Lawry. Thank you for the opportunity. 10.5K views · 51 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Delighted to interview @Jack_Watling for the substack. We talked about the situation in Ukraine and has new book on Statecraft. Lots of fascinating detail and insights on why the Ukrainians are doing better and the Russians are doing worse. (£/free trial) 25.3K views · 60 likes · 7 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Statecraft: The New Rules of Power in a Divided World, out now - https://t.co/vmWAPrMejV 34.1K views · 131 likes · 15 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

6 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 10K–100K pengikut. tampil luas, tetapi sedikit penonton yang merespons.

Median tayangan7 534akun ini924median untuk 10K–100K
Jangkauan, %13.50%akun ini3.62%median untuk 10K–100K
Interaksi, %0.42%akun ini1.52%median untuk 10K–100K
MetrikAkun iniMedian untuk 10K–100KRasio
Median tayangan per postingan7 5349248.15×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)13.50%3.62%3.73×
Tingkat interaksi0.42%1.52%0.28×

Akun lain pada rentang ini →   Bandingkan dengan akun lain →   Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

34.1K24 Mar
25.3K18 Jun
10.5K
59K
9.4K
36.2K
3.6K
169.5K21 Jul
3.2K
3.5K
7K
13K11 Aug
8.1K12 Aug

Last 13 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.45%24 Mar
0.27%18 Jun
0.53%
1.02%
2.05%
1.07%
1.40%
0.57%21 Jul
0.62%
0.45%
0.39%
0.23%11 Aug
0.36%12 Aug

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes67.5%2 106 in total
Reposts13.7%429 in total
Replies2.1%64 in total
Bookmarks16.7%522 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Akun serupa