tweetindex
ID

noyb – European Center for Digital Rights

@NOYBeu · Vienna, Europe · joined 22 Sep 2017

👉 About us: https://t.co/sYpGcV6tGz 👉 Become a member: https://t.co/bSk6YhXC0x #NoneOfYourBusiness #InvestInPrivacy

20 221Followers
235Following
2 298Posts total
4.4KViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

🇦🇹 Der Oberste Gerichtshof (OGH) hat entschieden, dass die Kreditauskunftei #CRIF unrechtmäßig Daten von Adressverlagen für Bonitätsbewertungen verwendet hat. Max #Schrems fordert nun ein sofortiges Ende der Zusammenarbeit. 🎧 Hier gehts zum Radiobeitrag: https://t.co/YCIpCBoXmf 396 views · 3 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
⁉️ What can be done to protect people's privacy in today's day and age? 📰 noyb data protection lawyer Levan Lobzhanidze spoke with Canada's Globe and Mail about privacy, data protection and fundamental rights. Read all about it here 👇 https://t.co/47YHvoOnAb 633 views · 6 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
"Die Kreditauskunftei CRIF hat personenbezogene Daten, die von Adressverlagen zu Marketingzwecken gesammelt wurden, unzulässig für Bonitätsbewertungen verwendet. Das hat der Oberste Gerichtshof (OGH) in mehreren Verfahren festgestellt." https://t.co/SjwlalgkUB 690 views · 8 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@NOYBeu What makes it a strong line of attack is how narrow the dispute actually is. CRIF has said the address publisher data serves only to identify people and does not feed into the default probability calculation. Your answer, that using it for identification is already a purp 71 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
🚨 Der OGH hat entschieden: Die derzeit praktizierte Datenerhebung von CRIF bei Adressverlagen ist illegal. Damit ist ein wesentlicher Vorwurf von noybs Unterlassungsklage schon vor der ersten Verhandlung höchstgerichtlich bestätigt. https://t.co/zMXa7lxrJP 1K views · 20 likes · 6 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Dadurch steigen auch die Erfolgschancen unserer Sammelklage gegen CRIF weiter. Im Erfolgsfall gehen wir von rund 500€ Schadenersatz pro Person aus! Melde dich hier an: https://t.co/nsDNQX4IaS 289 views · 3 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
📢 Looking for alternatives to X/Twitter? You can also follow us on... ▸ https://t.co/sbkxpw0SpL ▸ https://t.co/OmqZFSE5Ue ▸ https://t.co/59yHm0JNES https://t.co/fz8cfL0nk6
1.3K views · 4 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

6 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 10K–100K pengikut. menjangkau lebih sedikit orang dibanding akun seukurannya.

Median tayangan514akun ini924median untuk 10K–100K
Jangkauan, %2.54%akun ini3.62%median untuk 10K–100K
Interaksi, %1.73%akun ini1.52%median untuk 10K–100K
MetrikAkun iniMedian untuk 10K–100KRasio
Median tayangan per postingan5149240.56×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)2.54%3.62%0.70×
Tingkat interaksi1.73%1.52%1.14×

Akun lain pada rentang ini →   Bandingkan dengan akun lain →   Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.3K14 Apr
2891 Sep
1K
71
690
6332 Sep
3967 Sep

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.54%14 Apr
1.73%1 Sep
2.88%
1.41%
1.45%
1.74%2 Sep
1.77%7 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes58.4%45 in total
Reposts20.8%16 in total
Replies10.4%8 in total
Quotes1.3%1 in total
Bookmarks9.1%7 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Akun serupa