Regina Watteel ✓

@ReginaWatteel · Ottawa · joined 31 Aug 2021

PhD Statistics | Author of Fisman’s Fraud | Independent, unfunded research dismantling Canada’s COVID vaccine mandate evidence → https://t.co/0Scb8kdl5J

13 415Followers

747Following

13 062Posts total

241.2KViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

Regina Watteel ✓@ReginaWatteel27 Aug

Trump didn’t create Canada’s housing mess, productivity slump, or capital flight. He’s just exploiting them. Harper’s point isn’t that Washington is blameless — it’s that we can’t keep using it as cover for a decade of our own bad decisions. Own the file or keep declining. 1.2K views · 37 likes · 9 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Regina Watteel ✓@ReginaWatteel22 Aug

As the saying goes, keep your expectations low and you won't be disappointed. Being impressed by failure has its perks, especially with this government. 943 views · 30 likes · 6 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Regina Watteel ✓@ReginaWatteel12 Aug

Nothing prepared me for the cruelty we witnessed from the medical establishment during the pandemic. 7.5K views · 547 likes · 172 reposts · 31 replies Open on X →

Regina Watteel ✓@ReginaWatteel10 Aug

Yet Health Canada / Canadian public health strongly recommended the shots to pregnant women. RCT data never established safety or efficacy in pregnant women + plausible pathways to harm both mothers and fetuses. How do we trust such agencies? 13K views · 543 likes · 214 reposts · 43 replies Open on X →

Regina Watteel ✓@ReginaWatteel10 Aug

FAUCI TEXT MSG: "I asked around a bit more and another issue came up that you need to be aware of. Since many people have significant cytokines storm and fever after the 2nd dose, this theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester" WEISSMAN (Nobel prize 95K views · 423 likes · 155 reposts · 31 replies Open on X →

Regina Watteel ✓@ReginaWatteel21 Nov 2025

A systematic dismantling of every major piece of evidence used to justify Canada’s 2021–22 COVID vaccine mandates and travel restrictions. ROBUST. DAMNING. DEFINITIVE. Preprint (SocArXiv/OSF): https://t.co/p8zsS16Tja Independent & unfunded → https://t.co/nmExpvWPXX https://t. 123.7K views · 1.4K likes · 699 reposts · 81 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

5 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 10K–100K pengikut. tampil jauh melampaui audiensnya sendiri, dan audiens itu merespons.

Median tayangan7 456akun ini924median untuk 10K–100K

Jangkauan, %55.58%akun ini3.62%median untuk 10K–100K

Interaksi, %4.14%akun ini1.52%median untuk 10K–100K

Metrik	Akun ini	Median untuk 10K–100K	Rasio
Median tayangan per postingan	7 456	924	8.07×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)	55.58%	3.62%	15.3×
Tingkat interaksi	4.14%	1.52%	2.72×

Akun lain pada rentang ini → Bandingkan dengan akun lain → Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

123.7K21 Nov

95K10 Aug

13K

7.5K12 Aug

94322 Aug

1.2K27 Aug

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.82%21 Nov

0.66%10 Aug

6.22%

10.11%12 Aug

4.14%22 Aug

4.10%27 Aug

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes58.3%2 967 in total

Reposts24.7%1 255 in total

Replies3.8%191 in total

Quotes2.0%103 in total

Bookmarks11.2%569 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.