tweetindex
ID

Korobochka (コロボ) 🇦🇺✝️🇷🇺 ✓

@cirnosad · Donbass (2010) · joined 08 Dec 2021

The Dumb△ss of Donbass. Ice fairy hunting lunatic shrine maidens. Warning: Extreme baka individual. ニュータイプ I do this for you Nasrallah,Maya,Darya,Aaron,Sinwar.

135 174Followers
1 028Following
317 270Posts total
891KViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

The JudeoSatanic demons are trying to attach a Synagogue note on this post, please fight back! https://t.co/8C565Xuwcr
2.4K views · 100 likes · 8 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
We are now forced to conclude only one single missile had the energy to penetrate 6 walls of the Pentagon. The P700 Granit from the Soviet Union (now Russia 🇷🇺). It's not even close, and the margin for different penetration profiles/interior walls and so on becomes irrelevant. h
88.3K views · 569 likes · 118 reposts · 28 replies Open on X →
Here is every cruise missile up to September 2001, which had not been decommissioned, along with the resultant kinetic energy. This is as thorough as we can possibly be, and if the kinetic energy is less than 279 MJ, we can eliminate it as a candidate. Next up we will chart htt
17.3K views · 175 likes · 28 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
Identifying The Missile That Struck the Pentagon The missile struck the pentagon at a 70 degree angle, penetrated 6 walls. These walls were separated by 50 feet (~15.24 meters) inside the partitions, with a 30 feet gap (9.1 meters) in between. Eliminating Drag The first https:
15.4K views · 226 likes · 47 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
Forensic Investigation of the Terror Attack on the Pentagon ================ What struck the Pentagon? A cruise missile. That's not enough of a detail for us. We want to find out who was also behind this attack and the murder weapon class is insufficient. We need to find the ht
81.1K views · 465 likes · 90 reposts · 18 replies Open on X →
For the first time, we can clearly see what looks like a cruise missile. In fact, I am SHOCKED that this video ever saw the light of day. Unlike the plane, a cruise missile is completely consistent with almost all the facts we have observed. The low altitude flight? Check. htt
32.9K views · 549 likes · 68 reposts · 16 replies Open on X →
Next up, let's examine the footage of the object that struck the Pentagon to determine what it was, and its heading. Only two videos exist that show the object, and both of them run at very slow frame rates. But, amazingly, the object IS visible and looks nothing like a plane. h
1:48
14.8K views · 306 likes · 50 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →
Addendum: "But Koro!" you might ask "What if it was the nose cone? It was going really fast!" Well, let's examine this final complaint, because it will prove to be important for the rest of our investigation. It doesn't matter what the speed of an object is, only relative speed
2:52
30.8K views · 381 likes · 69 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →
The most obvious clue to look into is the lack of an initial wall collapse, a single 2 meter hole, seemingly centred on the point of impact. Let's suspend our disbelief for a moment and claim that an airplane struck the Pentagon. In that case, what part of the plane is most http
15.6K views · 312 likes · 58 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
@cirnosad Thank you for your hard work cirno. Before the next part drops, this is my guess 3.4K views · 41 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The ☢️ Missile Strike at the Pentagon on 9/11 /🧵 What really struck the WTC on 9/11? We've already eliminated airplanes as an option, which is a shock to anyone who lived through that day. We now have video evidence of not inserted planes in all footage of 9/11, but also the ht
106K views · 1K likes · 293 reposts · 48 replies Open on X →
@cirnosad 22 minutes after the pentagon got hit the first tower collapsed then approximately 30 minutes after, the second tower collapsed. Does that have anything to do with the tuning fork experiment 🤔 4.9K views · 13 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Finally, the only unadulterated shot of the WTC exploding on 9/11. Not only was there no "plane" to speak of... There was also another object in the sky. This video was broadcast once and then never again. After this shot, all of the backdrops were lumakeyed. In some cases, htt
1:18
409K views · 3.1K likes · 675 reposts · 186 replies Open on X →
@cirnosad @Souria4Syrians fucking hell that may be a pure specimen 80 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@cirnosad @Souria4Syrians Good God! 😬 97 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@Souria4Syrians Neanderthal on the left. 2.8K views · 106 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
What Assad fought against for 14 years https://t.co/KwWLBlvuT3
50.5K views · 1K likes · 93 reposts · 25 replies Open on X →
It make look similar to a human being but this is in fact a Neanderthal. I am not saying this because I find this creature disgusting -- I do -- but that's not the point. It's extremely important to classify species in this manner. Look up the slaver ant for example. It carries
227 views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
OSINT f*gg*ts, J**s and n*****s have been completely buck broken by Ansarallah who they don't understand. Back in the /sg/ days, we predicted that Ansarallah would control the entire middle east once the dust blows over because of their unity, discipline, persistence, 1.9K views · 57 likes · 7 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Always and forever. 💙🫂 1.4K views · 17 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
We can conclude from this that the majority of Sunnis are animals. 2.5K views · 84 likes · 3 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
It doesn't help that insane women are also very cute if and only if pure. https://t.co/FiF3ouIIub
1.4K views · 13 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@cirnosad Cheers for always backing the good over the bad. Good on ya ❤️ 1.3K views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Houthis are losing saar crowd is on suicide watch, lost Hays and about to lose Mokha 6.9K views · 170 likes · 9 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

24 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 100K–1M pengikut. tampil jauh melampaui audiensnya sendiri, dan audiens itu merespons.

Median tayangan5 892akun ini5 983median untuk 100K–1M
Jangkauan, %4.36%akun ini1.49%median untuk 100K–1M
Interaksi, %1.66%akun ini0.93%median untuk 100K–1M
MetrikAkun iniMedian untuk 100K–1MRasio
Median tayangan per postingan5 8925 9830.98×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)4.36%1.49%2.93×
Tingkat interaksi1.66%0.93%1.79×

Akun lain pada rentang ini →   Bandingkan dengan akun lain →   Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

8012 Sep
409K17 Sep
4.9K18 Sep
106K19 Sep
3.4K
15.6K
30.8K
14.8K
32.9K
81.1K
15.4K20 Sep
17.3K
88.3K
2.4K

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.00%12 Sep
0.97%17 Sep
0.31%18 Sep
1.29%19 Sep
1.22%
2.43%
1.50%
2.46%
1.94%
0.71%
1.82%20 Sep
1.19%
0.82%
4.55%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes62.1%8 685 in total
Reposts11.6%1 617 in total
Replies2.7%372 in total
Quotes0.7%96 in total
Bookmarks23.0%3 212 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Akun serupa