tweetindex
ID

David Zweig ✓

@davidzweig · Lower Hudson Valley · joined 25 May 2011

Author of INVISIBLES and AN ABUNDANCE OF CAUTION. Order: https://t.co/36kL0G6P11 Subscribe: https://t.co/ytTP1HqGbi Clips: NYT, Atlantic, NYmag, TFP, Wired.

123 668Followers
995Following
4 897Posts total
100.7KViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

It’s clear that academics in social sciences intellectualize themselves into supporting fads that the average person can see are idiotic. Architecture is similarly vulnerable. At best, a few of these buildings are “interesting.” Most are objectionable. None are uplifting. 4.4K views · 27 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
New initiative at Rutgers to discuss and debate ethics in science and how scientists behave, including gain of function research, climate research and more. Congratulations to @Bryce_Nickels on this important program! https://t.co/UJ0GkGFlJ9 3.9K views · 9 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
🧵ANNOUNCEMENT: This fall, I’m launching a new initiative at the Waksman Institute at @RutgersU: The Purpose of Science Lecture Series: Conversations on Science, Society, and Responsibility https://t.co/y4rCNXT6Uc (1/n) 6K views · 23 likes · 9 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The AI trying to close caption Michael Stipe’s lyrics is the funniest thing I’ve seen in ages. Humanity prevails. The machine can never fully understand man. The last chorus AI gives up, simply repeating “bring it” for “radio free Europe” https://t.co/rKY1I2jnvl 4.1K views · 17 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Why didn't schools open? A core answer is that The New Yorker, along with much of MSM, did ~zero investigative reporting during the pandemic that dug into the literature and evidence behind NPIs. The institutional inability, even today, to recognize this failure is troubling. htt 82.3K views · 1.4K likes · 246 reposts · 91 replies Open on X →
💥🔥🧨 I am beyond excited to announce that I will be writing AN ABUNDANCE OF CAUTION, a book for @mitpress, about the schools debacle in America during the pandemic. The book, in essence, will be a case study of how and why bad decisions are made THREAD 1/12 0 views · 1.9K likes · 322 reposts · 152 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

5 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 100K–1M pengikut. tampil luas, tetapi sedikit penonton yang merespons.

Median tayangan4 406akun ini5 983median untuk 100K–1M
Jangkauan, %3.56%akun ini1.49%median untuk 100K–1M
Interaksi, %0.58%akun ini0.93%median untuk 100K–1M
MetrikAkun iniMedian untuk 100K–1MRasio
Median tayangan per postingan4 4065 9830.74×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)3.56%1.49%2.39×
Tingkat interaksi0.58%0.93%0.63×

Akun lain pada rentang ini →   Bandingkan dengan akun lain →   Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

82.3K16 Aug
4.1K25 Aug
6K27 Aug
3.9K
4.4K1 Sep

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

2.16%16 Aug
0.49%25 Aug
0.58%27 Aug
0.33%
0.70%1 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes76.0%1 501 in total
Reposts13.3%262 in total
Replies4.9%96 in total
Quotes1.0%19 in total
Bookmarks5.0%98 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Akun serupa