tweetindex
ID

Jonathan Laxton MD, FRCPC 🇨🇦🇨🇦

@dr_jon_l · joined 31 Aug 2016

🇨🇦 Internal Medicine physician and asst. professor of medicine 🏳️‍🌈. My views are my own. Star Wars 🤓. Medical Director of Virtual Ward Program. He/Him.

10 017Followers
969Following
39 408Posts total
15.5KViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

So RFK Jr lied when he said the two cases were "made up" - one had measles and died of splenic rupture (and had measles in the lung), the second was an infant who died directly from measles infection. Very sad. This should not be happening in 2026 2.7K views · 86 likes · 16 reposts · 15 replies Open on X →
1) they LNP from tue vaccine didnt increase risk of mets 2) no experiment tested to see if there was tumorigensis in the paper 3) they injected massive doses into the mice along with aggressive cancer cells. I want to see where Wang uses the imaginary term "turbo cancer" https 1K views · 52 likes · 11 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →
Oh good, I needed a good laugh today ans thankfully I have another McCullough/Hulscher paper to laugh at. This one looks just as bad as previous offerings. This is again not a study, its on Zenodo to bypass peer review, as usual. https://t.co/3ThkL3yvmK 2.5K views · 132 likes · 22 reposts · 22 replies Open on X →
🤣🤣🤣🤣 so I guess that counts as examples Steve couldnt counter? https://t.co/GoZXdzb31t 2.5K views · 180 likes · 16 reposts · 25 replies Open on X →
"Pesticide dermatitis" (allergic contact dermatittis) would not be confused woth measles. Measles starts at the hairline, involves the trunk, is mildly itchy, has fever and respiratory symptoms, had Koplick spots in the mouth 1.2K views · 42 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Classic game Kirsch plays: 1) Makes an extremely narrow definition of the evidence he will accept for proof against him 2) Uses poor anecdotal evidence as "proof" of his beliefs It's an evidentiary double standard. Someone pointed out 6 reportedly unavaccinated amish children 5.5K views · 109 likes · 18 reposts · 14 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

6 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 10K–100K pengikut. tampil jauh melampaui audiensnya sendiri, dan audiens itu merespons.

Median tayangan2 524akun ini924median untuk 10K–100K
Jangkauan, %25.19%akun ini3.62%median untuk 10K–100K
Interaksi, %5.65%akun ini1.52%median untuk 10K–100K
MetrikAkun iniMedian untuk 10K–100KRasio
Median tayangan per postingan2 5249242.73×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)25.19%3.62%6.96×
Tingkat interaksi5.65%1.52%3.71×

Akun lain pada rentang ini →   Bandingkan dengan akun lain →   Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

5.5K1 Sep
1.2K3 Sep
2.5K
2.5K4 Sep
1K
2.7K

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

2.60%1 Sep
3.71%3 Sep
8.80%
6.98%4 Sep
7.07%
4.32%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes75.3%601 in total
Reposts10.8%86 in total
Replies10.7%85 in total
Quotes0.6%5 in total
Bookmarks2.6%21 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Akun serupa