tweetindex
ID

Jump Capital

@jumpcapital · Chicago | NYC · joined 06 Aug 2014

VC fund. Operator mindset. Backing founders modernizing industries.

17 241Followers
596Following
783Posts total
2.6KViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

80% of people in @McKinsey's latest State of AI survey say AI has made them more productive. Only 37% of organizations attribute any EBIT impact to it. The difference? Nearly 3/4 of AI high performers have fundamentally redesigned workflows around AI, vs. about 1/4 of everyone h 325 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@CaterpillarInc has roughly 1.6 million connected assets generating more than 16 petabytes of structured data. Those numbers tell us more about where physical AI actually is than another robotics funding announcement. CTO Jaime Mineart told @TechCrunch that the hard part isn't 425 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Cybersecurity companies are raising bigger rounds earlier. But more capital also comes with a higher bar. Or as, Jump Capital Partner @saayanath put it in a @SPGMarketIntel article, “The bigger rounds buy you the scope to actually build a platform, but they also compress the http 441 views · 1 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@jumpcapital @truefoundry vendor neutral plus MIT is a rare combo most agent harnesses lock you in somewhere 7 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Congrats to the @TrueFoundry team on the agent harness launch! TrueForge is: - Vendor-neutral: any model, any MCP server - Open source (MIT license) - Benchmarked at up to 50% lower cost than Claude Managed Agents, with the same accuracy Worth a look if you're building with 842 views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Identity authorizes what an agent can do. Runtime monitors and enforces what it actually does. Endpoint sees where it's doing it. Do you need all three? Our read from @BlackHatEvents: not one vendor absorbing the other two, but consolidation organized around the moment of https 563 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

6 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 10K–100K pengikut. di bawah akun sekelasnya baik pada jangkauan maupun interaksi.

Median tayangan433akun ini924median untuk 10K–100K
Jangkauan, %2.51%akun ini3.62%median untuk 10K–100K
Interaksi, %0.61%akun ini1.52%median untuk 10K–100K
MetrikAkun iniMedian untuk 10K–100KRasio
Median tayangan per postingan4339240.47×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)2.51%3.62%0.69×
Tingkat interaksi0.61%1.52%0.40×

Akun lain pada rentang ini →   Bandingkan dengan akun lain →   Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

56313 Aug
84219 Aug
7
44121 Aug
4252 Sep
3253 Sep

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.07%13 Aug
1.19%19 Aug
0.00%
0.91%21 Aug
0.24%2 Sep
0.31%3 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes69.6%16 in total
Reposts4.3%1 in total
Replies21.7%5 in total
Bookmarks4.3%1 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Akun serupa