Michael Shermer ✓
@michaelshermer · Santa Barbara, CA · joined 24 Apr 2009
On UAP Science Advisory Council. Opinions my own. Skeptic mag. https://t.co/i81i0rp1HP | Host Michael Shermer Show | Author TRUTH: https://t.co/0FvkBGFl26
250 864Followers
271Following
26 699Posts total
3.7MViews on collected posts
Postingan terbaru
Mencari postingan baru…
Daily Awe thanks to clouds, moisture, water refraction, and the sun behind us… https://t.co/jiVmXlHa1x
3.3K views · 37 likes
· 1 reposts · 12 replies
Open on X →
Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and an Article of Faith About the Dropping of Atomic Bombs
Klaus Ziegler on why I am wrong in my defense of the U.S. nuclear attacks on Japan:
https://t.co/5sGPXfv9VF
3.8K views · 6 likes
· 0 reposts · 3 replies
Open on X →
Why indeed? I have a few thoughts on the matter that I share with @marissastreit for @prageru
4.1K views · 14 likes
· 5 reposts · 3 replies
Open on X →
Why are conspiracy theories so alluring? Skeptic magazine founder @michaelshermer explains that conspiracies are real: people do plot in secret for power, money, or advantage all the time. But every conspiracy theory still needs evidence. The difference now is that social media h
4.7K views · 4 likes
· 0 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
Too bad we didn't get around to Jewish Space Lasers
@marissastreit (along with everything else "the Jews" are up to). But there is plenty to go around, unfortunately.
5.2K views · 20 likes
· 1 reposts · 7 replies
Open on X →
NEW RELEASE: Why Conspiracy Theories Are So Addictive | Michael Shermer
Author and Skeptic magazine founder @michaelshermer joins @marissastreit to discuss why conspiracy theories spread, how some turn out to be true, and how to tell the difference between healthy suspicion and
13.8K views · 14 likes
· 5 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Breaking news from the frontiers of physics and cosmology… https://t.co/uj0B57GUsP
3.3K views · 122 likes
· 16 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
@michaelshermer had to deal with Nature editors a year or two ago. They were among the dumbest ive come across, and statistically illiterate. Stuart Buck wrote about it in the link below. I had a paper in a Nature journal that reviewers said to publish in 2025. Their DEI Editor
3.2K views · 116 likes
· 14 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Defend the West Conference.
It's online and free for anyone to watch all our lectures. https://t.co/6Fb4GeXsRG
3.5K views · 34 likes
· 6 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
That's the problem @elonmusk Much of science has shifted from the search for truth to social activism. The North Star must always be the truth.
6.8K views · 291 likes
· 26 reposts · 18 replies
Open on X →
It is indeed a disgrace. Those publications have an obligation to adhere to the truth and yet have become woke propaganda outlets.
3.5M views · 20K likes
· 2.5K reposts · 958 replies
Open on X →
@michaelshermer I remember when Scientific American went woke, fired the whole hard sciences editorial staff and brought in the DEI crowd that seemed to demand every article answer to a societal inequity. Nature and the Economist felt like the last resort for fact. Now what? Scie
2.8K views · 97 likes
· 9 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
@michaelshermer It’s corrupting minds too https://t.co/mviBlVkhCK
4.3K views · 148 likes
· 8 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
Seeing lots of surprised reactions to the absurd Nature editorial on Jason Arday. Frankly, I'm surprised people are surprised.
Nature has been totally captured by wokeness for a while now. I've been trying to call attention to this for nearly a decade. There are no serious https
115.5K views · 4.2K likes
· 819 reposts · 153 replies
Open on X →
Is There a Second Arrow of Time?
My conversation with geoscientist Robert Hazen & astrobiologist Michael Wong based on their new book in which they propose a new law of nature:
https://t.co/frm2Ofzqrq
12.3K views · 40 likes
· 4 reposts · 8 replies
Open on X →
Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama
15 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 100K–1M pengikut. jangkauan biasa untuk ukurannya, reaksi lebih kuat dari kebanyakan.
Median tayangan4 275akun ini5 983median untuk 100K–1M
Jangkauan, %1.70%akun ini1.49%median untuk 100K–1M
Interaksi, %1.21%akun ini0.93%median untuk 100K–1M
| Metrik | Akun ini | Median untuk 100K–1M | Rasio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median tayangan per postingan | 4 275 | 5 983 | 0.71× |
| Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut) | 1.70% | 1.49% | 1.14× |
| Tingkat interaksi | 1.21% | 0.93% | 1.31× |
Akun lain pada rentang ini → Bandingkan dengan akun lain → Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →
Growth & engagement
How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.
Views per post
115.5K2 Sep
4.3K3 Sep
2.8K
3.5M
6.8K
3.5K
3.2K
3.3K
13.8K
5.2K4 Sep
4.7K
4.1K
3.8K
3.3K
Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.
Engagement rate per post
4.52%2 Sep
3.65%3 Sep
3.78%
0.67%
4.95%
1.21%
4.09%
4.23%
0.15%
0.54%4 Sep
0.11%
0.54%
0.24%
1.53%
Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.
What the audience does
Likes82.4%25 163 in total
Reposts11.3%3 457 in total
Replies3.8%1 167 in total
Quotes0.5%162 in total
Bookmarks2.0%606 in total
Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.
The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.
Akun serupa
Laurie Whitwell ✓
@lauriewhitwell
501.7K followers
· 20.7K posts
Sidekick
@Sidekick_Labs
501.6K followers
· 672 posts
ropz ✓
@ropz
501.5K followers
· 3.7K posts
Kings Of Leon ✓
@KingsOfLeon
501.4K followers
· 972 posts
george ✓
@StokeyyG2
501.4K followers
· 72.5K posts
SHEKHINAH
@shekhinahd
501.3K followers
· 17.8K posts
Rabia Zayyat
@rabiazayyat
501.3K followers
· 68.4K posts
Watsons Thailand ✓
@WatsonsThailand
501.3K followers
· 21.1K posts