tweetindex
ID

Jon Pike

@runthinkwrite · Hove UK · joined 26 May 2011

Professor of Philosophy @OU_Philosophy. Political philosophy and the ethics and metaphysics of sport. @OU_GCRN (RT ≠ endorsement, all views personal, obvs.)

33 841Followers
7 193Following
40 566Posts total
382.4KViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

https://t.co/vVOkoHa956 1.1K views · 15 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
The Proclaimers were interviewed on @BBCPM yesterday: it's at 51:00. Amongst other things they insist that they are 'of the old Left: a Left that is interested in the redistribution of wealth, stronger trade unions, better lives for working class people and class politics.' ... 153.2K views · 2.1K likes · 206 reposts · 36 replies Open on X →
Gosh. This may cause a little consternation in some circles. 38.5K views · 1K likes · 62 reposts · 22 replies Open on X →
Interesting timing: the Holborn and St Pancras By-election (basically Labour vs Polanski of the Greens) is to be on 8th October. The Greens are to debate the right of males to compete in female sport between 2nd - 4th October at their conference in Brighton. ... 12.9K views · 362 likes · 54 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →
@runthinkwrite @FondOfBeetles @OpenUniversity “Semenya has an ineligible advantage for the category, not an unfair advantage within it.” It is not easy explaining complex problems in terms laypeople can understand yet you’ve done it brilliantly. Thank you very much for your work 472 views · 26 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
... The DSD regulations of @WorldAthletics were changed earlier this year, along the lines we advocate in this paper. We hope that the paper will generate some discussion, and that other IFs and the IOC will follow the lead of WA. 2K views · 95 likes · 4 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
... We think that both approaches go wrong at an early stage. We argue that, on the correct accounts of 'sex' and 'fairness', that these athletes are male, not female, and that they should not be eligible for competition in the female category. ... 1.5K views · 79 likes · 7 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
... Athletes with the 46XY DSD 5-αRD are male athletes, in the senses that count for sport. We think this is the first peer-reviewed academic paper to say this explicitly. ... 2.8K views · 133 likes · 14 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
... We agree with what WA was trying to do - preserve the integrity of the female category - and we agree with some of the criticisms made by Bowman-Smart, such as that T-reduction unfairly burdens these athletes. ... 1.5K views · 50 likes · 4 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
... We disagree *both* with this general 'T reduction' thrust of the WA regulations *and* with the alternative proposal of Bowman-Smart to drop the regulations. ... 1.5K views · 54 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
... till earlier this year. But the 2023 regs were a more restrictive version of the approach that has been taken for many years by WA: requiring that athletes with a set of specific conditions must reduce their T levels in order to compete in the female category. ... 1.7K views · 47 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
It is a response to this paper by Hilary Bowman-Smart, Julian Savulescu, Michele O'Connell and Andrew Sinclair. https://t.co/xozNe1bRgX Somewhat confusingly, as we explain in a footnote, the Bowman-Smart et al. paper criticises the WA regulations as they were in place from 2.4K views · 59 likes · 6 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Here is my latest paper, published today in the Journal of the Philosophy of Sport and co-authored with Dr Emma Hilton @fondofbeetles from Manchester University. I would like to thank @OpenUniversity for their ongoing support of my research https://t.co/Ou90CxUPAj 162.8K views · 1K likes · 284 reposts · 33 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

4 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 10K–100K pengikut. tampil jauh melampaui audiensnya sendiri, dan audiens itu merespons.

Median tayangan25 692akun ini1 014median untuk 10K–100K
Jangkauan, %75.92%akun ini3.74%median untuk 10K–100K
Interaksi, %2.19%akun ini1.68%median untuk 10K–100K
MetrikAkun iniMedian untuk 10K–100KRasio
Median tayangan per postingan25 6921 01425.3×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)75.92%3.74%20.3×
Tingkat interaksi2.19%1.68%1.30×

Akun lain pada rentang ini →   Bandingkan dengan akun lain →   Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

162.8K18 Jul
2.4K
1.7K
1.5K
1.5K
2.8K
1.5K
2K
472
12.9K7 Sep
38.5K9 Sep
153.2K10 Sep
1.1K11 Sep

Last 13 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.82%18 Jul
2.85%
3.01%
3.71%
3.80%
5.32%
5.63%
5.06%
5.72%
3.31%7 Sep
2.86%9 Sep
1.52%10 Sep
1.43%11 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.68%.

What the audience does

Likes82.7%5 030 in total
Reposts10.6%646 in total
Replies1.9%115 in total
Bookmarks4.8%291 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Akun serupa