Steve Weis

@sweis

Software engineer at @anthropicai interested in cryptography, security, privacy, and machine learning.

12 641Followers

2 794Following

8 356Posts total

3.1MViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

Steve Weis@sweis20 Sep

Oops, GNFS is subexponential. Just trying to emphasize factoring is still as hard and this didn’t improve the runtime. 60.9K views · 170 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Steve Weis@sweis20 Sep

@sweis What services did you use to rent GPUs for this? 349 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Steve Weis@sweis20 Sep

Also to clarify: - No new algorithmic factoring improvements. - It’s still exponential. - No new threats to deployed keys. 119.7K views · 607 likes · 18 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →

Steve Weis@sweis20 Sep

@sweis 2 is a factor of (RSA-896 + 1) 73.4K views · 1.1K likes · 5 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Steve Weis@sweis20 Sep

I asked Claude if it had a message for a public: “The credit belongs first to the people who built the number field sieve and CADO-NFS over several decades, and to the teams who set the earlier records. This run used their algorithm and much of their code.” 163.7K views · 676 likes · 10 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →

Steve Weis@sweis20 Sep

I had Claude port CADO-NFS to run on GPUs. Then it orchestrated a fleet to run on scavenged idle capacity. It ran with a max of 2048 GPUs for about of 30 GPU-years over 10 days. 170.8K views · 723 likes · 17 reposts · 27 replies Open on X →

Steve Weis@sweis20 Sep

636606729769440499166579950236036751749912014371509557713570027508971809534551913252252094954941974952859310861988904737359709200557919 is a factor of RSA-896 https://t.co/yGWyEC8RpZ 2.5M views · 7.9K likes · 862 reposts · 194 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

7 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 10K–100K pengikut. tampil luas, tetapi sedikit penonton yang merespons.

Median tayangan119 687akun ini995median untuk 10K–100K

Jangkauan, %946.82%akun ini3.92%median untuk 10K–100K

Interaksi, %0.45%akun ini1.54%median untuk 10K–100K

Metrik	Akun ini	Median untuk 10K–100K	Rasio
Median tayangan per postingan	119 687	995	120×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)	9.5× audience	3.92%	242×
Tingkat interaksi	0.45%	1.54%	0.29×

Akun lain pada rentang ini → Bandingkan dengan akun lain → Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

2.5M20 Sep

170.8K

163.7K

73.4K

119.7K

349

60.9K

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.36%20 Sep

0.45%

0.43%

1.58%

0.53%

0.86%

0.29%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.54%.

What the audience does

Likes76.8%11 202 in total

Reposts6.3%914 in total

Replies1.7%246 in total

Quotes2.0%293 in total

Bookmarks13.2%1 926 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Postingan terbaru

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Akun serupa