tweetindex
ID

tarungupta.eth | ✓

@tarungupta1475 · Dubai · joined 19 Nov 2012

Founder & CEO @0xCoinshift

16 049Followers
1 140Following
4 996Posts total
22.3KViews on collected posts

Postingan terbaru

Do you think Fireblocks is expensive? 285 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Astra You moved me from Fable. 396 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
I think i have figured out a real solution here which can work for all lenders even if the lending protocol gets hacked. Lending against RWAs should be fully protected despite the venue risk as long as RWA collateral reserves are intact. Stay tuned 😅 388 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@tarungupta1475 @llama pull real cases where a DeFi lending protocol's RWA collateral got hacked and check whether lenders or the RWA issuer actually ate the loss, to see if this borrower-protected pattern actually holds up 7 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Some aggressive attack going on X users. https://t.co/OuoKlVa0Zt
437 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@tarungupta1475 another case for tranching 130 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@tarungupta1475 Aren’t they lending ETH on AAVE atm? 380 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Had a call this week with one of the bigger DeFi liquid funds. They have pulled out of DeFi lending entirely. Their reason was, As a lender, you carry the full notional risk of the position, and you are not paid for it. On the other side. Borrowers earn looping APRs. And when 14.3K views · 109 likes · 6 reposts · 21 replies Open on X →
@tarungupta1475 Really appreciated the depth here Most people still view tokenized credit as “RWA distribution.” But this piece hints at something much bigger: onchain credit becoming a composable collateral layer. The moment assets like ACRED are widely accepted inside lending 175 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
https://t.co/oPoGVIlASk 5.8K views · 14 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Dibandingkan akun berukuran sama

8 postingan dari 90 hari terakhir, dibandingkan dengan rentang 10K–100K pengikut. di bawah akun sekelasnya baik pada jangkauan maupun interaksi.

Median tayangan384akun ini924median untuk 10K–100K
Jangkauan, %2.39%akun ini3.62%median untuk 10K–100K
Interaksi, %0.87%akun ini1.52%median untuk 10K–100K
MetrikAkun iniMedian untuk 10K–100KRasio
Median tayangan per postingan3849240.42×
Jangkauan (tayangan ÷ pengikut)2.39%3.62%0.66×
Tingkat interaksi0.87%1.52%0.57×

Akun lain pada rentang ini →   Bandingkan dengan akun lain →   Bagaimana tolok ukur ini disusun →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

5.8K20 Apr
1757 May
14.3K31 Aug
380
130
4372 Sep
73 Sep
3884 Sep
3967 Sep
2859 Sep

Last 10 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.29%20 Apr
3.43%7 May
0.97%31 Aug
0.53%
2.31%
0.69%2 Sep
28.57%3 Sep
0.77%4 Sep
1.01%7 Sep
0.00%9 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes60.3%143 in total
Reposts2.5%6 in total
Replies10.5%25 in total
Quotes2.1%5 in total
Bookmarks24.5%58 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Akun serupa