tweetindex
IT

David Dack ✓

@DavidDack · Bali · joined 15 Dec 2010

Honest running benchmarks. No ego. No gatekeeping. Helping everyday runners train smarter and stop falling for nonsense.

24 326Followers
13 992Following
57 541Posts total
13.2KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

At what point does posting every run on Strava stop being “tracking your training”… and start looking like the run only counts if other runners see it? 949 views · 5 likes · 1 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
@DavidDack Given its all less than a cheap set of golf clubs, let them have their fun 240 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@DavidDack Old school runner here . 1990 lad in changing room at HM shaved legs fake tan sunglasses Scottish international triathlon track suit . Passed him on the way home in car post race breathing out his arse finishing in well over 2 hours . Must have been some fucking cycli 286 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Runners will cut their sleep short to squeeze in an early run… then call it discipline. Running on 5 hours of sleep isn’t automatically discipline. Sometimes the smarter training choice is going back to bed. 2.4K views · 35 likes · 0 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
@DavidDack Diaper is hot I heard 293 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Carbon shoes. Race-day singlet. Expensive watch. Aero sunglasses. Dressed like a pro. Then they line up in the middle of the pack. What’s your FIRST thought? “Good for them.” or “Trying way too hard.” Don’t give me the polite answer. 5.4K views · 12 likes · 0 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →
180 is not a passing grade for runners. A 2025 review found that when increasing cadence helped, the useful change was typically: 5–10% above YOUR normal cadence. Not: “Everybody get to 180.” Another study found the exact same runners averaged: 169 spm at the slower pace 178 spm 981 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
is this guy for real? 2.6K views · 13 likes · 0 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

8 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. copertura nella norma per la sua dimensione, reazione più debole della media.

Visualizzazioni mediane965questo account924mediana per 10K–100K
Copertura, %3.97%questo account3.62%mediana per 10K–100K
Interazione, %0.76%questo account1.52%mediana per 10K–100K
MetricaQuesto accountMediana per 10K–100KRapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post9659241.04×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)3.97%3.62%1.10×
Tasso di interazione0.76%1.52%0.50×

Altri account di questa fascia →   Confronta con un altro account →   Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

2.6K14 Sep
981
5.4K
293
2.4K
286
240
949

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.68%14 Sep
0.82%
0.41%
0.34%
1.64%
0.70%
0.83%
1.16%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes71.0%76 in total
Reposts0.9%1 in total
Replies25.2%27 in total
Bookmarks2.8%3 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Account simili