History Speaks ✓
@History__Speaks · joined 29 Jun 2021
I'm historian Matthew Ghobrial Cockerill. YouTube: https://t.co/9yUcHxFID5 Substack: https://t.co/j6ZmPah0Qi Less active lately as I finish my thesis
25 604Followers
560Following
58 277Posts total
762.4KViews on collected posts
Ultimi post
Cerchiamo nuovi post…
@History__Speaks @SpencerGuard Spencer’s not the brightest. Extraordinary that he was ever given a platform for his so called ‘analysis’. Zero credibility. He just parrots the same old 💩 to his little crowd of pro-Netanyahu disciples. Nice to see you exposing him. On, on…
3.7K views · 127 likes
· 11 reposts · 6 replies
Open on X →
@thehill @pangram @smallwars @MWI_editor @wapo 12/12 Like his “little brother” Andrew Fox (@Mr_Andrew_Fox), who extensively & with no disclosure uses AI to write entire articles under his name, John Spencer is a charlatan and a liar. This was already evident from his IDF apologet
7.8K views · 235 likes
· 43 reposts · 13 replies
Open on X →
@thehill @pangram @smallwars @MWI_editor @wapo 11/12 Our final example of an article purportedly written by Spencer, “The real enemy of Hamas lies in a Gaza safe zone,” was published by the Washington Post (@Wapo) on 29 Oct 2025.
@Pangram says AI wrote 89% of it. https://t.co/q
6.3K views · 107 likes
· 12 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
@thehill @pangram @smallwars @MWI_editor @wapo 10/12 On 19 January 2026, an article purportedly written by Spencer, “Own the Night or Die,” was published by the Modern War Institute (@MWI_editor) on the West Point website.
98% of it was entirely written by an AI bot, per @pangr
6.5K views · 105 likes
· 12 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
@thehill @pangram @smallwars @MWI_editor @wapo 9/12 A March 15, 2026 article in the Wall Street Journal, “China Has a Lot to Lose in the U.S.-Israel War on Iran,” was unusually human-heavy for Spencer standards.
An impressive 38% of it was written by a human (and polished by an
7K views · 112 likes
· 10 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
@thehill @pangram @smallwars @MWI_editor @wapo 8/12 On 22 March 2026, the NY Post published an article, purportedly by Spencer, entitled “The rise of the ‘leadership first’ strike — and why it’s so important in warfare.” Per @pangram, literally 100% of it was written by an LLM. h
7.8K views · 130 likes
· 14 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
@thehill @pangram @smallwars @MWI_editor 7/12 On 25 March 2026, the Washington Post (@wapo) - one of America’s premier newspapers - published "How to make the Strait of Hormuz irrelevant," purportedly written by Spencer.
It was actually 95% written by an LLM, according to @Pang
31.4K views · 136 likes
· 19 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
@thehill @pangram @smallwars @MWI_editor 6/12 On 31 March 2026, Fox News published an article, purportedly by Spencer, entitled “Destroy the regime’s power without occupying Iran: A smarter war plan.”
Per @pangram, this article is 96% LLM written. https://t.co/KT2hcClDsg
10K views · 143 likes
· 16 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
@thehill @pangram @smallwars 5/12 On 1 April 2026 the Modern War Institute (@MWI_editor) of West Point published an article purportedly by Spencer called “Want Combat-Ready Units? Don’t Let the Connected World Fracture Unit Cohesion”
Astonishingly, this was literally 100% AI-wri
31.8K views · 198 likes
· 24 reposts · 3 replies
Open on X →
@thehill @pangram 4/12 The next article is “Military Science and the Intellectual Foundations of War”, published by Small Wars Journal (@smallwars) on 12 June 2026.
This was 99% AI-written, with almost no text written by a human, per @Pangram. (Perhaps Spencer wrote out his name
46.4K views · 192 likes
· 24 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
3/12 Our first example is Spencer’s 20 August 2026 article for @thehill, “Panama is one battle in China’s infrastructure war,” coauthored with Frank Viola.
According to @Pangram, fully 88% of this article written by an LLM, while 12% was written by a human and LLM-edited. http
18K views · 192 likes
· 21 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
2/12 Before we delve in, two points.
First, AI detectors like Pangram are highly reliable, with false positive rate below 1%, per a @UChicago study.
Second, this matters - and is dishonest - bc many readers of Spencer wouldn't read him if he disclosed AI writes his articles. ht
22.6K views · 256 likes
· 24 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
1/12 John Spencer (@SpencerGuard) is known for misrepresenting the ratio of civilians to combatants killed in Gaza, among his other crude apologetics on behalf of the IDF.
His lying doesn't stop here. He has LLMs write entire articles under his name. It's 🧵 time! https://t.co/E
536.5K views · 1.3K likes
· 368 reposts · 92 replies
Open on X →
This “movie” actually illustrates an ongoing, perennial problem on the American Right: lack of human capital. They cannot make movies worth watching.
852 views · 15 likes
· 0 reposts · 4 replies
Open on X →
What she said is descriptively accurate. As the attendance at Khamenei's funeral shows, "many people" in Iran were indeed "in deep mourning" over Khamenei's death. Many people in Iran were also elated and celebrating. And many others were indifferent, ambivalent, etc.
1.2K views · 5 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Imagine believing this is a liberal democracy. What ridiculous - contemptuous - propaganda the Israeli gov have fed the West.
2.1K views · 62 likes
· 8 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
This is false. They bought into the claim that NATO expansion provoked the war - which I reject - but condemned the war as illegal and called for Russian troops to withdraw from Ukraine.
1.4K views · 12 likes
· 0 reposts · 4 replies
Open on X →
@History__Speaks To be fair Code Pink have been very public apologists for Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the atrocity crimes committed there.
1.6K views · 1 likes
· 0 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
Yep never do politics guys because it may mean associating with "bad" people! Very good faith stuff here from Nazanin, who certainly didn't favor the war or anything like that.
1.9K views · 36 likes
· 5 reposts · 5 replies
Open on X →
On the anniversary of Mahsa's murder, watch this and ask yourself: Do these people EVER hold the Islamic Republic responsible? Which victims are being discussed? Which voices are missing?
Same org whose comms staffer said Iranians were in deep mourning over their chief oppressor
14.1K views · 185 likes
· 47 reposts · 11 replies
Open on X →
@persianmagai You can be anti war and not join forces with Code Pink, who have very blatantly closed their eyes to Iranian suffering when the regime is doing it.
3.7K views · 10 likes
· 0 reposts · 4 replies
Open on X →
Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione
21 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. arriva a più persone rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione.
Visualizzazioni mediane7 050questo account924mediana per 10K–100K
Copertura, %27.53%questo account3.62%mediana per 10K–100K
Interazione, %1.62%questo account1.52%mediana per 10K–100K
| Metrica | Questo account | Mediana per 10K–100K | Rapporto |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visualizzazioni mediane per post | 7 050 | 924 | 7.63× |
| Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower) | 27.53% | 3.62% | 7.61× |
| Tasso di interazione | 1.62% | 1.52% | 1.06× |
Altri account di questa fascia → Confronta con un altro account → Come sono costruiti questi parametri →
Growth & engagement
How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.
Views per post
85217 Sep
536.5K19 Sep
22.6K
18K
46.4K
31.8K
10K
31.4K
7.8K
7K
6.5K
6.3K
7.8K
3.7K
Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.
Engagement rate per post
2.23%17 Sep
0.34%19 Sep
1.26%
1.20%
0.48%
0.71%
1.62%
0.51%
1.87%
1.76%
1.82%
1.90%
3.79%
3.92%
Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.
What the audience does
Likes73.0%3 570 in total
Reposts13.5%658 in total
Replies3.3%159 in total
Quotes2.0%98 in total
Bookmarks8.2%403 in total
Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.
The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.
Account simili
Arif Kocabıyık 🇹🇷͜͜͡͡✯ ✓
@ilavetvAntalya
51.2K followers
· 4.2K posts
ultra instinct Vegito
@Codycar38772937
51.2K followers
· 11.5K posts
Ontario Liberal Party | Parti Libéral de l'Ontario ✓
@OntLiberal
51.2K followers
· 37.7K posts
Daniel Batten ✓
@DSBatten
51.2K followers
· 11.7K posts
Larona Moagi
@Larona_Moagi_
51.2K followers
· 36K posts
Joyce Msuya
@JoyceMsuya
51.2K followers
· 5.5K posts
Acermendax
@Acermendax
51.2K followers
· 13.6K posts
Sandra Chindoy ✓
@sandra_chindoy
51.2K followers
· 8.8K posts
Frequently asked questions about @History__Speaks
How many followers does @History__Speaks have?
25 604 followers.
How many posts has @History__Speaks published?
58 277 posts.
How do posts by @History__Speaks perform?
Collected posts: 21. Views: 762 426. Likes: 3 570.