Institute for Policy Studies

@IPS_DC · Washington, DC · joined 22 Sep 2008

Since 1963, the Institute for Policy Studies has challenged inequality, corporate power, polluters, and militarism. Find us at https://t.co/JcCFbOdcJs.

23 151Followers

2 483Following

37 221Posts total

6.8KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

Institute for Policy Studies@IPS_DC16 Sep

🎙️ TOMORROW: In Sudan, 19 million people face acute hunger in a “profound humanitarian collapse.” Thursday 9/17, join a panel of experts to learn the root causes of this complex situation and what can be done to move forward. Last chance to register: https://t.co/K2P8Sn5DoL 168 views · 0 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Institute for Policy Studies@IPS_DC16 Sep

By drawing the connection between militarism and domestic issues like structural inequality, progressive Democrats have a chance to reform the party’s disappointing performance on foreign policy. Jiachen Shi on @FPIF https://t.co/fRRYnIFmMS 208 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Institute for Policy Studies@IPS_DC15 Sep

NEW: While many foundations and donor-advised funds lag in moving wealth to working charities, some donors are showing how to give quickly and effectively to support urgent societal needs. They should be applauded — and copied. REPORT from @inequalityorg: https://t.co/h2T301zqKF 249 views · 0 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Institute for Policy Studies@IPS_DC14 Sep

#OTD 25 years ago, Rep. Barbara Lee cast the sole vote against rushing to war in the days after 9/11. Although she endured terrible backlash, she was backed every step by broad, anti-war grassroots movements. This is what principled leadership looks like. https://t.co/euFo5BBSjg

0:54

613 views · 6 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Institute for Policy Studies@IPS_DC4 Sep

Despite a rise in anti-Muslim incidents last year, the success of prominent Muslim candidates across the U.S. indicates that the Islamophobic agenda of right-wing politicians is not representative of the majority of Americans. @JohnFeffer on @FPIF https://t.co/ybsel1SdjF 265 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Institute for Policy Studies@IPS_DC4 Sep

NEW: The typical worker at the 100 lowest-wage U.S. companies made just $36,571 in 2025. That's less than 1% of their CEOs’ average pay of $17.5 million. @veronicaricco & @JonEasley in @LeverNews: https://t.co/euCuY1rr1B 282 views · 6 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Institute for Policy Studies@IPS_DC4 Sep

As the Trump administration considers allowing drilling on protected public lands in New Mexico, residents of Greater Chaco are pushing back and spreading awareness about the hidden costs for local communities. Julian Villa on @inequalityorg https://t.co/y5lXG0bP64 220 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Institute for Policy Studies@IPS_DC3 Sep

NEW: Across the country, the CEO-worker pay gap is widening precipitously. In Minnesota last year, one company saw a CEO-median worker pay gap of 1,548 to 1(!). Curb this CEO greed. @PKennedyStrib in @StarTribune: https://t.co/seVIUzBIOK 253 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Institute for Policy Studies@IPS_DC13 May

@IPS_DC https://t.co/r13jLx1nSI 7 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Institute for Policy Studies@IPS_DC20 Mar

@IPS_DC POS commie organization. 11 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Institute for Policy Studies@IPS_DC11 Nov 2025

@IPS_DC In other words, you're a Marxist group. 27 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Institute for Policy Studies@IPS_DC10 Feb 2025

We unapologetically support movements to resist fascism and win transformational progressive change — and we have done so for over 60 years. For the full scope of timely analysis from IPS public scholars now and in months to come, follow us at https://t.co/E6qd4EYXu3. https://t.

4.5K views · 32 likes · 8 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

8 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. sotto i pari sia per copertura sia per interazione.

Visualizzazioni mediane251questo account924mediana per 10K–100K

Copertura, %1.08%questo account3.62%mediana per 10K–100K

Interazione, %0.69%questo account1.52%mediana per 10K–100K

Metrica	Questo account	Mediana per 10K–100K	Rapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post	251	924	0.27×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)	1.08%	3.62%	0.30×
Tasso di interazione	0.69%	1.52%	0.46×

Altri account di questa fascia → Confronta con un altro account → Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

4.5K10 Feb

2711 Nov

1120 Mar

713 May

2533 Sep

2204 Sep

282

265

61314 Sep

24915 Sep

20816 Sep

168

Last 12 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.07%10 Feb

3.70%11 Nov

0.00%20 Mar

0.00%13 May

0.79%3 Sep

0.45%4 Sep

2.48%

0.38%

1.63%14 Sep

1.20%15 Sep

0.48%16 Sep

0.60%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes64.1%50 in total

Reposts20.5%16 in total

Replies9.0%7 in total

Quotes2.6%2 in total

Bookmarks3.8%3 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ultimi post

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Account simili