MLflow ✓

@MLflow · San Francisco, CA · joined 04 Aug 2018

The open source developer platform to build AI applications and models with confidence.

11 726Followers

48Following

1 321Posts total

2.7KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

MLflow ✓@MLflow23 Sep

A multi-agent app can return 200 OK and still be wrong. Request dashboards miss bad tool calls, empty MCP data, and stale-prompt token burn. In this video, @LegareKerrison (@RedHat) covers MLflow tracing, LLM-as-judge evals, and production setup. 🎥 Watch: 218 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

MLflow ✓@MLflow22 Sep

@MLflow The split between an async FastMCP client and scoped genai/traditional ML tools is a useful design choice. Keeping the 20–30 read/write operations local or next to tracking should make governance and latency much easier to reason about. 3 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

MLflow ✓@MLflow18 Sep

@MLflow Love this take 13 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

MLflow ✓@MLflow18 Sep

@MLflow This is a compelling bridge from natural-language assistance to traceable operations. Local or adjacent deployment plus explicit read/write scope should make MCP adoption easier to review and govern. 7 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

MLflow ✓@MLflow18 Sep

Use the MLflow MCP server to query tracking data from code or an assistant. 👇 🔹 Async Python FastMCP client, scoped to genai or traditional ml tools 🔹 Configure Claude, VS Code, or Cursor, then ask in plain English 🔹 ~20–30 read/write tools; runs locally or next to tracking 853 views · 10 likes · 1 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

MLflow ✓@MLflow17 Sep

@MLflow The session grouping and custom columns are especially practical; treating trace metadata as a first-class navigation tool should shorten the path from anomaly to root cause. 5 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

MLflow ✓@MLflow16 Sep

@MLflow Making the rebuilt trace explorer the default is a strong usability win: dense tables help triage, while span trees preserve causal detail. Folding multi-turn sessions into the same view should also make agent debugging much less fragmented. 6 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

MLflow ✓@MLflow15 Sep

@MLflow The focus on trace density, drill-down, metadata columns, and multi-turn grouping makes this feel like a real observability workflow improvement—not just a visual refresh. The default experience should lower the friction of debugging agent runs. 2 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

MLflow ✓@MLflow14 Sep

The trace explorer in MLflow 3.16.0 has been rebuilt from the ground up and is now the default traces experience. 🔹 Traces table: Tighter row density, a cleaner header, and smoother navigation 🔹 Span-tree explorer: Redesigned for faster drill-down 🔹 Custom columns: Reorder htt

0:33

636 views · 12 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

MLflow ✓@MLflow11 Sep

2 weeks until Open Lakehouse + AI Meetup in Paris 🇫🇷 Building with MLflow? Don't miss @omnigent_ai: A Meta Harness for AI Agents. Aravind Segu and Edwin He will show how to capture @opentelemetry traces for observability in MLflow across multi-harness agent workflows. 🗓️ Sept h

504 views · 9 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

MLflow ✓@MLflow9 Sep

What’s New in MLflow: September 2026 Roundup https://t.co/V9EJELV9XV 478 views · 6 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

11 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. raggiunge meno persone di account della stessa dimensione.

Visualizzazioni mediane13questo account924mediana per 10K–100K

Copertura, %0.11%questo account3.62%mediana per 10K–100K

Interazione, %0.00%questo account1.52%mediana per 10K–100K

Metrica	Questo account	Mediana per 10K–100K	Rapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post	13	924	0.01×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)	0.11%	3.62%	0.03×
Tasso di interazione	0.00%	1.52%	0.00×

Altri account di questa fascia → Confronta con un altro account → Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

4789 Sep

50411 Sep

63614 Sep

215 Sep

616 Sep

517 Sep

85318 Sep

322 Sep

21823 Sep

Last 11 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.46%9 Sep

2.38%11 Sep

2.36%14 Sep

0.00%15 Sep

0.00%16 Sep

0.00%17 Sep

1.88%18 Sep

0.00%

0.00%22 Sep

1.38%23 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes57.4%39 in total

Reposts4.4%3 in total

Replies14.7%10 in total

Quotes1.5%1 in total

Bookmarks22.1%15 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ultimi post

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Account simili