tweetindex
IT

Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith ✓

@NutriDetect · 👇Visit My Website👉 · joined 19 Oct 2020

World Expert In vit A Toxicity & Detoxification. Helped 1000s Of People To Fix Chronic Disease. Enlightening People About Poisons They Thought Were Healthy.

38 507Followers
1 355Following
58 597Posts total
6.3KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

People who've gotten vitamin A down to nearly undetectable levels share one dietary pattern, beef and white rice, no beans. Cutting beans removes a major nickel source, and nickel is what blocks your body from clearing vitamin A. It was the nickel the whole time. https://t.co/X
0:43
1.7K views · 35 likes · 4 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
@NutriDetect the right peptides are for organ/body maintenance, not enhancing anything 9 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Vitamin A in wild animal livers has risen about 50% since the 1940s, with no supplementation involved. Nickel slows the body's ability to clear vitamin A, and environmental nickel has been climbing for decades. This isn't just a human supplement problem. https://t.co/4VDoY0tVVh
0:33
1.6K views · 34 likes · 5 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
New article for LYL members: https://t.co/qSC6PtVutK 1.1K views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
This is the critical reality that far too many are ignoring There is no such thing as a free lunch, aka don't make deals with the devil Peptides are pharma lite and are drug effects For truly healthy people, they don't do much. There's a reason for that 1.9K views · 14 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
By popular demand… Here are my “Best of the Best” threads that expose… The dangers of “vitamins” The problem with “health foods” The poisons being sold as “essential” Plus, discover a few ways to start slowly turning your health around today! Happy reading! 0 views · 1.3K likes · 305 reposts · 102 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

5 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. copertura nella norma per la sua dimensione, reazione più debole della media.

Visualizzazioni mediane1 556questo account924mediana per 10K–100K
Copertura, %4.04%questo account3.62%mediana per 10K–100K
Interazione, %0.93%questo account1.52%mediana per 10K–100K
MetricaQuesto accountMediana per 10K–100KRapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post1 5569241.68×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)4.04%3.62%1.12×
Tasso di interazione0.93%1.52%0.61×

Altri account di questa fascia →   Confronta con un altro account →   Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.9K17 Sep
1.1K
1.6K18 Sep
9
1.7K19 Sep

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.93%17 Sep
0.52%
2.76%18 Sep
0.00%
2.62%19 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes60.3%88 in total
Reposts8.2%12 in total
Replies6.2%9 in total
Quotes1.4%2 in total
Bookmarks24.0%35 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Account simili