tweetindex
IT

Orin Kerr ✓

@OrinKerr · Stanford, California · joined 14 Mar 2013

Professor, Stanford Law School. Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution. Read my book: https://t.co/NScgWkDNEI

129 839Followers
4 325Following
77 782Posts total
181KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

@OrinKerr So real 18 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@OrinKerr I love that you addressed the IRAC problem explicitly. This is how I put it in my book: To the extent that you’re using IRAC as a framework for your exam, then you might think of it in terms of IRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAC. The core of the exam answer should be the “A” (analysis 74 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@OrinKerr “your goal is to tell the professor that you can see exactly what they were thinking when they wrote the question” Is it too late to tell you now for my crim law final? 829 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Feedback is especially welcome on this from other law professors, especially if you think I got something wrong or missed something important. Thanks. 17.2K views · 54 likes · 3 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →
@OrinKerr On day one of civil procedure last year, my professor assigned your essay on how to read a legal opinion. It was incredibly helpful as someone who had absolutely no exposure to legal writing prior to law school. Looking forward to reading this one! 707 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@OrinKerr Thank you. Now I can send this to my students 511 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
NEW ESSAY: "How to Excel on Law School Essay Exams: A Guide for Students" https://t.co/ryoIuk2fEs I get this question a lot, and I have been meaning to write on it. I finally did, expanding an old blog post on this. Comments invited! https://t.co/SiGiKRtsJD 45.8K views · 419 likes · 48 reposts · 15 replies Open on X →
I'm about to post an essay for law students on how to excel on law school exams. Should have it up within the hour. I hope it's helpful. 9.5K views · 144 likes · 4 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
"It was the essence of creativity." https://t.co/eARYExmujG https://t.co/aObVAWnSkP 4.5K views · 20 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
If you're an engineer or other STEM major starting law school this fall, this old blog post might be helpful. https://t.co/OQjGKvX69j https://t.co/bdkCDQOkw3 6.3K views · 54 likes · 5 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
@OrinKerr @TheAtlantic Isn't it both? 364 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
I don't know if that particular rumor was true. But I take it there was always an elevated risk of cheating with take-homes. The counter was to not have take-home exams: That being more obvious today, with the elevated risk of AI cheating, is a call for profs to change. 1.7K views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Take-home exams are a good example. I have never assigned a take-home exam because, when I was a 1L, there were rumors that students in another 1L section with take-home exams had cheated on exams. According to the rumor, they met as a group to discuss the questions. 3K views · 10 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
@OrinKerr The MEANS rea!!! https://t.co/mQr79KC8eI 1.5K views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@OrinKerr Will make it harder to prosecute when someone finally tests the Yellowstone Park loophole. 699 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@OrinKerr In 2012 as a 3rd year lawyer, I did a federal trial in VT. The gov alleged that the defendant drove a parent with child from VA to Canada to dodge custody orders in VA and VT. I argued that trial had to take place where criminal conduct occurred. That could be VA, NY, o 1.2K views · 18 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
I recently listened to the oral argument in an important case on venue for federal criminal prosecution, Abouammo v. United States, argued March 30th. Federal venue is interesting for crim law nerds because it follows the Model Penal Code's breakdown of the types of elements. 29.5K views · 48 likes · 9 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
BTW, for those curious about the law of stop and frisk before Terry v. Ohio, the Ohio Court of Appeals ruling in 1966, on the way to SCOTUS, is a pretty interesting read on this. https://t.co/ZQzazpDqLs
4.5K views · 17 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Anyway, lots of interesting issues if the Court is interested. But who knows if they're interested. /end 3.9K views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
I assume the government would argue that Garner's argument applies to frisks: The need for officers to check for weapons is different in a world where people stopped may have guns than it was in 1791. 2.5K views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Consider TN v. Garner (1985), the "fleeing felon" case. In Garner, SCOTUS overturned the common law rule that officers could kill fleeing felons in part on the ground that guns changed everything. having guns changed the effect of the old rule. https://t.co/zFvCeljZuD https://t.c
1.6K views · 13 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
3) An additional question from an originalist perspective is what to do with technological change. At common law, it was rare for people stopped to be carrying guns; today, though, that's not uncommon. Should that difference matter? 1.9K views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
If you're going to make an originalist argument that there was no such justification to search in 1791, do you also need to also argue that a patdown would have been understood as a search in 1791? 3.4K views · 23 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
2) One potential problem with the Scalia view (that the petition advocates) is that it imports the modern definition of what is a search. That is, it assumes Terry's 1968 holding that the frisk as a search that needs to be separately justified. 2.9K views · 14 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Some thoughts: 1) There are a bunch of originalist arguments against current police power that are out there, and this is one. Whether there are four votes to take up the issue, I don't know, although the Court did call for a response so there's at least non-zero interest. 2.9K views · 25 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Interesting cert petition: Should the Supreme Court overturn Terry v. Ohio's "frisk" authority, on the originalist ground that there was apparently no equivalent legal authority in 1791? A few thoughts below. https://t.co/CaEKrSdGD8 https://t.co/3NTx1lGUZy
34K views · 195 likes · 35 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

13 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 100K–1M follower. copertura nella norma per la sua dimensione, reazione più debole della media.

Visualizzazioni mediane1 700questo account5 983mediana per 100K–1M
Copertura, %1.31%questo account1.49%mediana per 100K–1M
Interazione, %0.55%questo account0.93%mediana per 100K–1M
MetricaQuesto accountMediana per 100K–1MRapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post1 7005 9830.28×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)1.31%1.49%0.88×
Tasso di interazione0.55%0.93%0.59×

Altri account di questa fascia →   Confronta con un altro account →   Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.5K11 Jun
3K31 Aug
1.7K
364
6.3K2 Sep
4.5K
9.5K
45.8K
511
7073 Sep
17.2K
829
74
18

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.65%11 Jun
0.44%31 Aug
0.53%
0.55%
0.99%2 Sep
0.51%
1.62%
1.05%
0.20%
0.99%3 Sep
0.38%
0.72%
2.70%
0.00%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes53.2%1 113 in total
Reposts5.2%109 in total
Replies3.2%68 in total
Quotes0.6%12 in total
Bookmarks37.8%792 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Account simili