tweetindex
IT

Professor Avi Loeb ✓

@ProfAviLoeb · joined 24 Jan 2026

Avi Loeb is the Baird Professor of Science at Harvard University, Director of the Galileo Project, and Chair of the UAP Science Advisory Council @uapsac. No DMs

11 261Followers
57Following
270Posts total
150.4KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

Some Alien Space Travel Could Leave a Signal We Can Detect. In a new paper with my brilliant former postdoc, James Guillochon, shows that leakage from a light sail propulsion apparatus in operation around a solar system analog would produce a detectable signal. For cargo https:/ 6K views · 205 likes · 42 reposts · 37 replies Open on X →
@ProfAviLoeb Another absolutely dominant drop from Avi. Many people are engaged in deep conspiratorial thought on this and some of it may warrant consideration but our stance is that Avi and UAPSAC are a massive asset to the UAP/UFO/Disclosure domain 496 views · 12 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@ProfAviLoeb You previously said you were "tasked by ODNI, the White House, the Pentagon’s AARO, the FBI and the Intelligence Community" to create the advisory council. Here you say it was just ODNI and AARO. So... which is it? 837 views · 24 likes · 1 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
@ProfAviLoeb I asked ODNI some questions regarding this UFO advisory council. Their responses here: https://t.co/4ZjVCHDwiq 874 views · 15 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
After 12 remote meetings, the UAP Science Advisory Council will convene in Washington, D.C., next week for its first in-person meeting with its government partners. Three months ago, I was contacted by representatives from the ODNI, and AARO, in the Pentagon. They asked me to ht 59.3K views · 810 likes · 127 reposts · 119 replies Open on X →
I reached out to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) to ask about Harvard Professor Avi Loeb's UFO council and its relationship with the government. 🟢Question 1: Was Professor Loeb tasked by ODNI to establish and lead the UAP Science Advisory Council? http 31.5K views · 104 likes · 19 reposts · 29 replies Open on X →
@ProfAviLoeb Aliens are real https://t.co/zXK9dmDkLY 72 views · 8 likes · 4 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
@ProfAviLoeb You are 💯 on the money! 328 views · 14 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@ProfAviLoeb At some point this gets absurd. We’re asking scientists to solve the case from blurry CCTV while the evidence room is supposedly locked right next door. If firsthand material exists, protect the witnesses, open the door and let science do its job. 336 views · 10 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Scientists deserve access to reportedly retrieved first-hand UAP evidence. It makes little sense to keep analyzing blurry videos with insufficient information if a shortcut to the truth is already at hand. Whistleblowers should therefore receive the legal assurances needed to htt 33.9K views · 757 likes · 138 reposts · 79 replies Open on X →
@ProfAviLoeb I reject the notion that UAP orbs over military bases, nuclear sites, major cities, represent foreign adversary technology. The only possibly way that could be true is if the technology available to the Chinese or Russian governments, and the US gov, secretly cracked 282 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@ProfAviLoeb Possibly some of the newer sightings, but these metallic orbs have been present in the skies since at least the 1940's. https://t.co/qPba72hzGD 348 views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@ProfAviLoeb Throwing out data that does not fit preconceptions is unscientific. 131 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Are UAP Orbs Adversary Drones? It is plausible that the majority of the low-speed, formation-flying, radar-quiet orbs are genuinely human-made drones, while the outlier high-speed or high-radar-cross-section cases within the same dataset represent either measurement error or an h 16.1K views · 171 likes · 36 reposts · 46 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

14 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. arriva ben oltre il proprio pubblico, e quel pubblico reagisce.

Visualizzazioni mediane666questo account924mediana per 10K–100K
Copertura, %5.92%questo account3.62%mediana per 10K–100K
Interazione, %2.87%questo account1.52%mediana per 10K–100K
MetricaQuesto accountMediana per 10K–100KRapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post6669240.72×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)5.92%3.62%1.63×
Tasso di interazione2.87%1.52%1.89×

Altri account di questa fascia →   Confronta con un altro account →   Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

16.1K25 Aug
131
348
282
33.9K27 Aug
336
328
72
31.5K28 Aug
59.3K30 Aug
874
837
496
6K2 Sep

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.63%25 Aug
3.82%
1.44%
2.48%
2.92%27 Aug
4.17%
4.57%
20.83%
0.52%28 Aug
1.83%30 Aug
1.95%
3.94%
2.82%
4.81%2 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes69.5%2 142 in total
Reposts12.0%371 in total
Replies10.6%328 in total
Quotes2.3%72 in total
Bookmarks5.5%168 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Account simili