Quanta Magazine ✓

@QuantaMagazine

Illuminating math and science. Supported by @SimonsFdn. 2022 Pulitzer Prize in Explanatory Reporting.

366 770Followers

617Following

35 956Posts total

133.4KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

Quanta Magazine ✓@QuantaMagazine12 Sep

@QuantaMagazine 8.4k GPUs for a proof of concept that will be obsolete by the next architecture release. it’s not science, stargate is just burning venture cash like an IRS auditor in Vegas. 484 views · 1 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Quanta Magazine ✓@QuantaMagazine12 Sep

@QuantaMagazine … and stole the work of two humans. 425 views · 5 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Quanta Magazine ✓@QuantaMagazine10 Sep

@QuantaMagazine We are rapidly evolving out of the old Newtonian paradigm into the Quantum paradigm. Culturally and biologically. I am convinced that how we do science and our old attachment to who owns what theories are going to change and change exponentially. 165 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Quanta Magazine ✓@QuantaMagazine9 Sep

@QuantaMagazine https://t.co/Pk1FSxbl2Y 307 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Quanta Magazine ✓@QuantaMagazine9 Sep

@QuantaMagazine What we call AI is source intelligence. Think of AI cleaning up after a huge party and finding out things about the party, which party-goers missed. That is AI in mathematics. For 3,000 years mathematics did party but missed a lot on what was actually there. 225 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Quanta Magazine ✓@QuantaMagazine9 Sep

Mathematicians are witnessing a profound shift in their field. AI systems are now producing proofs, spotting connections between distant fields, and, in a few cases, solving problems that had stumped mathematicians for decades. The pace of progress over the past several months

17.1K views · 215 likes · 49 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →

Quanta Magazine ✓@QuantaMagazine9 Sep

🚨 AI in math: the summit vs the ascent OpenAI just dropped a 165-page Lean proof on Navier-Stokes. 10,000 agents. 88 hours. $15 M bill. The press release writes itself. The actual science? That's a different story. The problem remains officially unsolved. [ The summit ] htt

114.8K views · 22 likes · 9 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

7 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 100K–1M follower. sotto i pari sia per copertura sia per interazione.

Visualizzazioni mediane425questo account5 983mediana per 100K–1M

Copertura, %0.12%questo account1.49%mediana per 100K–1M

Interazione, %0.61%questo account0.93%mediana per 100K–1M

Metrica	Questo account	Mediana per 100K–1M	Rapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post	425	5 983	0.07×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)	0.12%	1.49%	0.08×
Tasso di interazione	0.61%	0.93%	0.65×

Altri account di questa fascia → Confronta con un altro account → Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

114.8K9 Sep

17.1K

225

307

16510 Sep

42512 Sep

484

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.03%9 Sep

1.61%

1.78%

0.33%

0.61%10 Sep

1.65%12 Sep

0.41%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes56.6%249 in total

Reposts13.6%60 in total

Replies2.7%12 in total

Quotes1.4%6 in total

Bookmarks25.7%113 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ultimi post

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Account simili