Sean McDowell ✓

@Sean_McDowell · Southern California · joined 20 Jan 2010

Jesus-follower, Biola Prof, Author, YouTuber, Spurs fan (Yes, I am Spider-Man) Tweets ≠ endorsements

102 526Followers

7 180Following

26 159Posts total

260.7KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

Sean McDowell ✓@Sean_McDowell17 Sep

@Sean_McDowell Sean, MAJOR straw man. The question is about the quality of the reports. We know nothing about “the 500.” Did Paul really “actually verify and meet“ with people who saw Jesus in the flesh post crucifixion? Peter, maybe. But where does Peter tell us he saw the ri 42 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Sean McDowell ✓@Sean_McDowell16 Sep

@Sean_McDowell Yeah, I doubt mass hallucinations too. The thing is that if you applied the same standard to group appearances that you applied in Fate of the Apostles, I think you would find low confidence for all the alleged group appearances. You lot love to latch onto mass h 64 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Sean McDowell ✓@Sean_McDowell16 Sep

Did Constantine make up the idea of a divine Jesus?? It’s possible…if he was over 150 years old! New Testament scholar, textual critic, and founder/Executive Director of the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts, Dan Wallace joins the show this week, looking at htt

1:50

3.3K views · 33 likes · 10 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Sean McDowell ✓@Sean_McDowell16 Sep

Yesterday I had a video talking about P46. Papyrus 46 dates to around AD 175 to 225 and holds nearly all of Paul's letters, including the 1 Corinthians 15 creed that goes back to the 30s. I've got a true-scale replica on real Egyptian papyrus sitting on my desk, and you can get h

1:37

2.9K views · 24 likes · 3 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Sean McDowell ✓@Sean_McDowell16 Sep

@Sean_McDowell Yeah mass hallucination is a terrible position. If I ever encounter someone who takes that stance I will pummel them with truth. But a group of believers came to believe Jesus had resurrected? I can see that unfolding. Even tho it wasn’t true, they embraced that 72 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Sean McDowell ✓@Sean_McDowell16 Sep

Mass hallucination?? No way… Dan Wallace explains how the volume of witnesses along with Paul’s trip to Jerusalem - actually verifying and meeting with people who SAW Jesus – is incredibly strong evidence for Jesus’ resurrection. Dan and I explore and discuss more of the http

1:46

3.9K views · 48 likes · 5 reposts · 16 replies Open on X →

Sean McDowell ✓@Sean_McDowell16 Sep

Free will?? Not coincidence! If everything is ultimately matter and physics, where does free will come from? “We make choices” describes what we do – but doesn’t explain HOW we can… #freewill #philosophy #truth #consciousness #apologetics #objectivity https://t.co/lLrVkwcztb

1:03

2.7K views · 26 likes · 3 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Sean McDowell ✓@Sean_McDowell5 Apr

Thanks for all the responses. Please don’t confuse “testable” with scientific testability. The resurrection is a historical event and it can be examined through the lens of history like other events in history. 3K views · 40 likes · 3 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →

Sean McDowell ✓@Sean_McDowell4 Apr

@Sean_McDowell If you’re calling the resurrection testable by history, you’re making a blatant category mistake. History deals in what typically happens. A man rising from the dead has no analog, so this isn’t something history can test in the first place. 5.6K views · 171 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Sean McDowell ✓@Sean_McDowell4 Apr

Only one religion is based on a single, testable, historical event. If you haven’t at least considered the evidence for the resurrection, NOW is the time. 239.1K views · 2.4K likes · 281 reposts · 184 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

7 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 100K–1M follower. arriva ben oltre il proprio pubblico, e quel pubblico reagisce.

Visualizzazioni mediane2 744questo account6 510mediana per 100K–1M

Copertura, %2.68%questo account1.64%mediana per 100K–1M

Interazione, %1.93%questo account0.97%mediana per 100K–1M

Metrica	Questo account	Mediana per 100K–1M	Rapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post	2 744	6 510	0.42×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)	2.68%	1.64%	1.63×
Tasso di interazione	1.93%	0.97%	1.99×

Altri account di questa fascia → Confronta con un altro account → Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

239.1K4 Apr

5.6K

3K5 Apr

2.7K16 Sep

3.9K

2.9K

3.3K

4217 Sep

Last 10 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.21%4 Apr

3.10%

1.78%5 Apr

1.17%16 Sep

1.93%

8.33%

1.03%

1.42%

7.81%

4.76%17 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.97%.

What the audience does

Likes80.3%2 732 in total

Reposts9.0%306 in total

Replies6.6%226 in total

Quotes1.3%44 in total

Bookmarks2.8%94 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ultimi post

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Account simili