TCGplayer

@TCGplayer

Empowering the Hobby Community

32 751Followers

154Following

13 866Posts total

233.3KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

TCGplayer@TCGplayer28 Aug

@ReidDuke had a different take: "I would cast Force of Negation. They invested 3 cards into Doomsday, and if I can counter it and then tap out for Jace, I'm in a good position. With Force of Negation and Miscalculation, I'd worry about losing to a 4th land and Thassa's Oracle." 1.4K views · 14 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

TCGplayer@TCGplayer28 Aug

@lsv "As it turned out, they went for the Thassa's Oracle kill but it took them multiple turns to set up, and I found a Tishana's Tidebinder by then (I still had double counter in hand, so they were covered)." 2/2 14.4K views · 124 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

TCGplayer@TCGplayer28 Aug

@lsv Here's what @LSV had to say: "While I could have used Force of Negation to counter Doomsday, I figured that with two counters in hand I had a pretty good chance of beating whatever they were setting up, and in my experience, most people don't have the perfect Doomsday deck" 110.4K views · 148 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

TCGplayer@TCGplayer27 Aug

@TCGplayer @lsv i think my instinct is miscalc it, intending to play jtms and fateseal them on my next turn? this could be wildly off base though 4.8K views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

TCGplayer@TCGplayer27 Aug

Here's the scenario @lsv was in: It's game one against an unknown Cube deck, you are on Bant Midrange. They went end of turn Mystical Tutor for Dark Ritual, and then untapped and cast Dark Ritual then Doomsday. So what's the play? We'll share LSV and Reid's answers tomorrow! h

102.2K views · 82 likes · 0 reposts · 14 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

5 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. arriva a molti, ma pochi di loro reagiscono.

Visualizzazioni mediane14 438questo account924mediana per 10K–100K

Copertura, %44.08%questo account3.62%mediana per 10K–100K

Interazione, %0.21%questo account1.52%mediana per 10K–100K

Metrica	Questo account	Mediana per 10K–100K	Rapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post	14 438	924	15.6×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)	44.08%	3.62%	12.2×
Tasso di interazione	0.21%	1.52%	0.14×

Altri account di questa fascia → Confronta con un altro account → Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

102.2K27 Aug

4.8K

110.4K28 Aug

14.4K

1.4K

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.10%27 Aug

0.21%

0.14%28 Aug

0.86%

0.98%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes91.0%376 in total

Replies4.1%17 in total

Quotes1.5%6 in total

Bookmarks3.4%14 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ultimi post

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Account simili