tweetindex
IT

Adam Steinbaugh ✓

@adamsteinbaugh

First Amendment lawyer, @theFIREorg. Licensed in PA and CA. Opinions are my own. @adamsteinbaugh.bsky.social.

16 531Followers
1 653Following
63 943Posts total
187.3KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

@EntergyArk Power company CEO now says suing newspapers and a FOIA requestor to censor coverage of a data center is the "right thing" to do. https://t.co/OPDjup0vqK No, @EntergyArk, SLAPP suits are never the "right thing." https://t.co/uS8qsa6Ylv 257 views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@EntergyArk Entergy says it is no longer seeking a preliminary injunction, but is pressing on with the lawsuit. For what purpose is anybody's guess. Its TRO motion is now also unsealed. It doesn't even mention the words "First Amendment": https://t.co/8hVo0h2bzm https://t.co/0s 454 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@EntergyArk Motion denied. Entergy sullied its reputation and drew a whole lot more attention to the article, and yet it is still seeking a preliminary injunction? https://t.co/MEwqnN7qru https://t.co/7BNRNbyIMG 6.3K views · 230 likes · 30 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
@EntergyArk I asked the Google data centers if this was a good idea and it gave better advice. Not sure if it was cheaper or not, but who's to say? https://t.co/9gQqfZznIn 3.5K views · 90 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
A federal judge Wednesday denied Entergy Arkansas' request for a temporary restraining order prohibiting the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette from publishing details from Public Service Commission documents the organization acquired. https://t.co/iWgdNOJBKo 9.5K views · 90 likes · 10 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@adamsteinbaugh Trade secret that your tax dollars and electric bills will be paying for a data center so people might push back from letting your taxes pay for it and then cut into their profits. 4.7K views · 217 likes · 12 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Yet @EntergyArk is asking the court to abandon decades of First Amendment law -- and dragging a FOIA requestor into federal court on the same day it sued her, to testify at an hourslong hearing, with no attorney. 9.4K views · 332 likes · 43 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →
If the government publicly releases information -- even if it's really sensitive and shared by mistake -- courts cannot order the genie back into the bottle. See, for example, Florida Star v. BJF, where police accidentally revealed the name of a rape victim. https://t.co/z7IwqAi 9.7K views · 285 likes · 36 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
What @EntergyArk is asking for is a prior restraint. That's the "most serious and the least tolerable infringement on First Amendment rights." Even Walter Sobchak knows that. https://t.co/AtgXyigDIg https://t.co/EM7lBth9bp 7.7K views · 314 likes · 38 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The lawsuit says that Arkansas' public energy commission "mistakenly" released records in response to a FOIA request by Jessica Kivell, who provided them to journalists. Here's the complaint: https://t.co/dMVj1xlHsg But the motion for a TRO? Sealed. https://t.co/RDmSbWJ7LC 8K views · 211 likes · 28 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Appalling: Energy company drags a mother into federal court, trying to stop her from sharing FOIA'd records -- records the state *gave her* -- about an Arkansas data center. And it wants the court to censor newspaper coverage. She left the courtroom "weeping loudly." https://t.c 118.4K views · 3.8K likes · 1.3K reposts · 36 replies Open on X →
Here's coverage from the @ArkTimes: https://t.co/GdN3GglDae And here's the article @EntergyArk asked the court to consider removing: https://t.co/teK9DXKHuW Cue Barbra Streisand. 9.4K views · 251 likes · 55 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

12 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. arriva ben oltre il proprio pubblico, e quel pubblico reagisce.

Visualizzazioni mediane7 852questo account924mediana per 10K–100K
Copertura, %47.50%questo account3.62%mediana per 10K–100K
Interazione, %3.42%questo account1.52%mediana per 10K–100K
MetricaQuesto accountMediana per 10K–100KRapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post7 8529248.50×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)47.50%3.62%13.1×
Tasso di interazione3.42%1.52%2.25×

Altri account di questa fascia →   Confronta con un altro account →   Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

9.4K2 Sep
118.4K
8K
7.7K
9.7K
9.4K
4.7K
9.5K
3.5K
6.3K
4543 Sep
2574 Sep

Last 12 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

3.28%2 Sep
4.37%
3.04%
4.60%
3.33%
4.10%
4.87%
1.13%
2.69%
4.28%
1.32%3 Sep
3.50%4 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes71.2%5 786 in total
Reposts19.3%1 565 in total
Replies0.7%60 in total
Quotes1.1%91 in total
Bookmarks7.7%624 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Account simili