Ken Ham ✓

@aigkenham · joined 05 Nov 2010

The founder of Answers in Genesis, the popular Creation Museum, and the world-renowned Ark Encounter.

111 930Followers

85Following

25 568Posts total

28.2KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

Ken Ham ✓@aigkenham8 Sep

Our Creator holds us accountable for our actions (Genesis 2:17) and expects us to choose and distinguish between right and wrong. 3.7K views · 308 likes · 46 reposts · 19 replies Open on X →

Ken Ham ✓@aigkenham8 Sep

Consider a forensic scientist. Imagine forensic scientists trying to solve a murder. They may find someone’s fingerprints and even blood type at the scene. The circumstantial evidence can overwhelmingly point to a particular person being the murderer. That person could be found 3.3K views · 95 likes · 23 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →

Ken Ham ✓@aigkenham7 Sep

@aigkenham Ken knows if her keeps running his Christian con he never has to actually work 17 views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Ken Ham ✓@aigkenham7 Sep

@aigkenham You lying creep. The Bible is already proven a lie by Empirical Evidence from Observed Reality. (No non-existent 'devil' required.) https://t.co/TKVt3cBrHe

52 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Ken Ham ✓@aigkenham7 Sep

According to God’s Word, humans were specially created in the image of God (Genesis 1:27). 5.1K views · 467 likes · 47 reposts · 34 replies Open on X →

Ken Ham ✓@aigkenham7 Sep

@aigkenham Well said Ken. Its important to KNOW that God alone is truth. And the evening and morning were the first day. 40 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Ken Ham ✓@aigkenham7 Sep

@aigkenham If he Devil was and the contents of Genesis were real then your argument may have had some substance to it. But as neither are, you argument remains more of a philosophical "what if". Genesis was written by a Bronze age culture who in turn had very little to no unders 56 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Ken Ham ✓@aigkenham7 Sep

https://t.co/M80hC1XYE5

6.1K views · 357 likes · 74 reposts · 48 replies Open on X →

Ken Ham ✓@aigkenham7 Sep

@aigkenham The scofield reference bible was “inspired” alright. Just not by God. 94 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Ken Ham ✓@aigkenham7 Sep

@aigkenham That's a much more academic answer that I've used for our Women's Bible study group 🙂. I just said, "Remember Ladies, only the 'top part' of your Bible is inspired. The bottom part was written by some man. It's usually pretty good info - but not 'inspired'!" 112 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Ken Ham ✓@aigkenham7 Sep

Footnotes are not inspired by God! I remember my father telling me when looking at the notes in the Scofield Reference Bible about the supposed “gap theory” (the idea of a gap of millions of years between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2) that we needed to always understand the notes were 9.6K views · 523 likes · 63 reposts · 32 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

11 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 100K–1M follower. raggiunge meno persone dei pari, ma le coinvolge molto di più.

Visualizzazioni mediane112questo account4 799mediana per 100K–1M

Copertura, %0.10%questo account1.76%mediana per 100K–1M

Interazione, %7.69%questo account1.30%mediana per 100K–1M

Metrica	Questo account	Mediana per 100K–1M	Rapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post	112	4 799	0.02×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)	0.10%	1.76%	0.06×
Tasso di interazione	7.69%	1.30%	5.90×

Altri account di questa fascia → Confronta con un altro account → Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

9.6K7 Sep

112

6.1K

5.1K

3.3K8 Sep

3.7K

Last 11 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

6.47%7 Sep

1.79%

2.13%

8.00%

8.93%

2.50%

10.77%

7.69%

35.29%

3.78%8 Sep

10.14%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 1.30%.

What the audience does

Likes78.8%1 765 in total

Reposts11.3%254 in total

Replies6.4%143 in total

Quotes0.9%20 in total

Bookmarks2.5%57 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ultimi post

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Account simili