tweetindex
IT

Daniel Lacalle Official Account ✓

@dlacalle_IA · London, UK · joined 17 Nov 2016

Official English Account. PhD #ChiefEconomist Tressis #Author. #Professor @IEbusiness @frdelpino. YouTube: https://t.co/sjWtBdfIT7

177 879Followers
12 483Following
71 707Posts total
656.8KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

@dlacalle_IA This man is a traitor to Europe. Regulation is what makes us strong 5.1K views · 324 likes · 1 reposts · 13 replies Open on X →
@dlacalle_IA Good luck with that! You don’t spend decades building a monolithic bureaucratic left wing superstate then ask it politely to reverse gear 😂 2K views · 114 likes · 4 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@dlacalle_IA The EU exists to regulate. That's what it does. Trying to make it deregulate is like asking a frog to fly. 5.6K views · 296 likes · 12 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →
Do it. And cut taxes. Fast. Or the EU will collapse. "We must deregulate every sector. And I call for a regulatory clean slate. Minor corrections to laws are not sufficient. We need to systematically review the whole set of existing EU legislation." Merz. European Industry http
0:21
375.1K views · 2.3K likes · 370 reposts · 473 replies Open on X →
One unit of currency in the taxpayer's pocket: Same units created were returned to the private sector. Saved, invested, or spent. One unit of currency in the government's pocket: Spent multiple times over, mostly in current spending and bureaucracy, leading to higher taxes in 2.4K views · 9 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@dlacalle_IA WRONG! As it would add over a TRILLION dollars to the deficit, it will require monetization and be inflationary directly. PLUS, equating giving 5000 in money to 240 million citizens to cutting taxes is absurd as less than HALF of those receiving checks pay 5000 1.3K views · 30 likes · 0 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
No, giving each taxpayer $5,000 back is not the same as the government spending $5,000 more per taxpayer. Giving money back to the private sector that earns it is not inflationary. Spending is. Criticize the Trump promise if you want, but don't say government spending and 50.6K views · 231 likes · 45 reposts · 114 replies Open on X →
US federal budget, 2002 vs. 2025: Receipts: $1.85tn → $5.24tn (+183%) Outlays: $2.01tn → $7.01tn (+249%) Deficit: -$0.16tn → -$1.77tn Revenues nearly tripled. Spending rose $5tn against $3.4tn of new revenue. For every extra dollar collected since 2002, the government spent 840 views · 5 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
One-year inflation expectations drop. via Bloomberg, New York Fed’s Survey of Consumer Expectations. https://t.co/VwKPM9NAcz
1K views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
The headlines may be dominated by the U.S., but the global debt problem is widespread and led by France and the UK. Hey, feel free to buy eurozone debt vs. Treasuries, but the bet is dangerous, to say the least. via Bloomberg https://t.co/5LiZVhCGUW
2.3K views · 28 likes · 5 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Germany... and it's gone. via Bloomberg. https://t.co/9anaeHECJe
2.6K views · 45 likes · 8 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@dlacalle_IA Scary this https://t.co/rMbhv1baRw Best 39 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Knowledge workers worldwide took out mortgages, car loans, etc. on the assumption that the value of their knowledge would always rise over time, because it always has. If the value of knowledge falls instead, trillions of dollars of consumer debt are at risk of default. 🤯 161.2K views · 1.2K likes · 110 reposts · 87 replies Open on X →
@dlacalle_IA Hey Daniel let's connect 64 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Thank you for your support. Explore my website for articles, videos and books: 🇬🇧 🇺🇸 English content: https://t.co/wSvCj7FF9i Books on Amazon: https://t.co/llV743lIR4 🇬🇧 🇺🇸 English-only YouTube channel: https://t.co/MVVRYugTAX https://t.co/VWWFCQ5L64
46.7K views · 91 likes · 18 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

13 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 100K–1M follower. esattamente sulla mediana della sua fascia di follower.

Visualizzazioni mediane2 392questo account5 983mediana per 100K–1M
Copertura, %1.34%questo account1.49%mediana per 100K–1M
Interazione, %0.88%questo account0.93%mediana per 100K–1M
MetricaQuesto accountMediana per 100K–1MRapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post2 3925 9830.40×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)1.34%1.49%0.90×
Tasso di interazione0.88%0.93%0.95×

Altri account di questa fascia →   Confronta con un altro account →   Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

6429 Jun
161.2K2 Aug
39
2.6K8 Sep
2.3K
1K
840
50.6K10 Sep
1.3K11 Sep
2.4K
375.1K12 Sep
5.6K
2K
5.1K

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.00%29 Jun
0.88%2 Aug
0.00%
2.03%8 Sep
1.46%
0.29%
0.83%
0.77%10 Sep
2.66%11 Sep
0.50%
0.83%12 Sep
5.67%
6.08%
6.68%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes74.4%4 658 in total
Reposts9.2%577 in total
Replies11.3%706 in total
Quotes0.5%29 in total
Bookmarks4.7%292 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Account simili