tweetindex
IT

rob harvilla

@harvilla · the internet · joined 04 May 2009

host / author of 60 SONGS THAT EXPLAIN THE '90S (book out tues. 11-14-23), ringer senior staff writer, gawky ohioan

33 880Followers
991Following
14 459Posts total
328.7KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

e49 of 60 SONGS THAT EXPLAIN THE '90S: THE 2000S is on evanescence's majestic "BRING ME TO LIFE," in which a dorky meddling record label has a good idea exactly once https://t.co/nnq0EuSik0
3.5K views · 54 likes · 3 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
yo buy steve's rad book on the strokes and help Save Rock 'n' Roll 9.6K views · 47 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
e48 of 60 SONGS THAT EXPLAIN THE '90S: THE 2000S is on sade's "BY YOUR SIDE" and includes a poem by all-star kansas city royals reliever dan quisenberry https://t.co/3QyfAtgpci
3K views · 39 likes · 4 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
e47 of 60 SONGS THAT EXPLAIN THE '90S: THE 2000S is on spoon's "THE UNDERDOG," a rad breakout hit from a band that doesn't need one https://t.co/gT52Nxkl2C
21K views · 143 likes · 6 reposts · 13 replies Open on X →
@harvilla I'm almost through all the OG podcast and love that there will be more, but Rob, I was kinda hoping for the 80s! We old now, though, so I get it. 🤣 1.3K views · 11 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
first episode next week on weds. 10-2; i am pleased to report that we're already in midseason form https://t.co/loBwsfsL07
13K views · 168 likes · 0 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →
you say the colon every time, or at least ***i do*** 13.3K views · 98 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
hello friends, our newish podcast is called 60 SONGS THAT EXPLAIN THE '90S: THE 2000S and will cover rad jams from 2000 to 2009; here is a trailer where i say that title as many times as possible in 60 seconds https://t.co/dJ0Re8gAFl 264K views · 1.2K likes · 85 reposts · 124 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

4 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. arriva a molti, ma pochi di loro reagiscono.

Visualizzazioni mediane6 548questo account1 018mediana per 10K–100K
Copertura, %19.33%questo account3.77%mediana per 10K–100K
Interazione, %1.17%questo account1.66%mediana per 10K–100K
MetricaQuesto accountMediana per 10K–100KRapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post6 5481 0186.43×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)19.33%3.77%5.13×
Tasso di interazione1.17%1.66%0.71×

Altri account di questa fascia →   Confronta con un altro account →   Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

264K25 Sep
13.3K
13K
1.3K
21K26 Aug
3K2 Sep
9.6K8 Sep
3.5K9 Sep

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.55%25 Sep
0.76%
1.36%
0.90%
0.77%26 Aug
1.57%2 Sep
0.52%8 Sep
1.82%9 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.66%.

What the audience does

Likes83.6%1 796 in total
Reposts4.7%100 in total
Replies7.5%161 in total
Bookmarks4.2%91 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Account simili