Leandro Narloch ✓
@lnarloch · SP · joined 08 Oct 2008
Journalist, author of Guia Politicamente Incorreto da História do Brasil, 1 million copies sold. Pronouns: Vossa Alteza, Your Highness. ;)
137 374Followers
1 689Following
5 056Posts total
705.5KViews on collected posts
Ultimi post
Cerchiamo nuovi post…
Ministro Edson Fachin, presidente do Supremo Tribunal Federal, cabe ao senhor evitar que o STF se afunde ainda mais na lama.
Afaste Alexandre de Moraes com urgência e determine sua prisão preventiva.
O Estado Democrático de Direito está em suas mãos, ministro! https://t.co/0Sk
40.3K views · 9.7K likes
· 2.4K reposts · 392 replies
Open on X →
As faculdades de Humanas foram dominadas por seitas identitárias. São lugares de fé, com rituais de demonstração de lealdade e perseguição a quem parece herege.
46.4K views · 2.2K likes
· 235 reposts · 31 replies
Open on X →
Esses 30 segundos da entrevista explicam tudo o que você precisa saber pra entender o que aconteceu na UFRJ. https://t.co/y2sHZeLyhc
66.1K views · 508 likes
· 67 reposts · 16 replies
Open on X →
0:30
Excelente iniciativa! A Wikipedia tem um viés de esquerda bem claro em parte dos verbetes.
4.4K views · 106 likes
· 11 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Aquela velha polêmica, "quais os limites do humor?", agora tem resposta:
O limite é o humor chapa-branca como este abaixo. Que vergonha, @revistapiaui.
13.2K views · 755 likes
· 58 reposts · 17 replies
Open on X →
[The piauí Herald] EXCLUSIVO: Lulinha não é candidato a presidente da República https://t.co/c32LEdbezT https://t.co/Ro8spYFc4r
163.9K views · 624 likes
· 102 reposts · 281 replies
Open on X →
@lnarloch @ggmaultasch Fio dos fios. Vocês são incríveis, sou fã.
785 views · 21 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Ops, wrong link! This is the right one: https://t.co/s2cnIQ9fes
4.9K views · 48 likes
· 6 reposts · 6 replies
Open on X →
Thanks for getting this far!
Follow us (@lnarloch and @ggmaultasch) for more content and debates on freedom of speech.
To return to top, click here: https://t.co/44JstIu1t1
4.2K views · 65 likes
· 1 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
27.2 Institutions are in a panic because people now see through them, and this undermines their legitimacy (@mgurri). People expect honesty, but institutions prefer to blame social media, police debate, and restrict dissent. (@EricRWeinstein, @shellenberger, @mtaibbi)
2.7K views · 60 likes
· 4 reposts · 3 replies
Open on X →
27. The New Media Fallacy
Finally, some claim that since social media allows faster communication, free speech has to be restricted to limit fake news, hate speech and anti-democratic speech. Old theories of free speech are obsolete; we are in a new era, they say.
1.4K views · 56 likes
· 3 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
27.1 But at its time the Gutenberg press was also extremely fast. Authorities thought “books” were a new media that could spread lies and therefore needed to be restricted; we now know they were wrong.
The problem isn't the speed or the new media, but the panic reaction to it.
1.7K views · 56 likes
· 3 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
26.1 But in times of crisis, people are fearful and may cede more power to authorities, who also use the crisis to secure more power. Temporary authorization becomes permanent, and the surgical strikes of censorship morph into widespread surveillance post-crisis.
1.3K views · 51 likes
· 3 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
26.2 Also, authorities and experts make mistakes (scientific racism, Tuskegee, etc), and fear may lead them to irrational decisions.
So the opposite is true: it is precisely in times of crisis that we need more checks on government abuse, and more protection for free speech.
1.3K views · 51 likes
· 3 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
26. Extreme Situation Fallacy
Some argue free speech should be suspended in times of crisis (e.g. war, pandemic); in exceptional times, the state should have temporary authorization for surgical strikes of censorship, so as to face the challenge in a cohesive, unified manner.
1.3K views · 54 likes
· 3 reposts · 4 replies
Open on X →
25.1 Besides, defending freedom of speech is not the same as approving the way people use that freedom. It is possible, for instance, to defend the individual right to use drugs while simultaneously disapproving of their use.
1.3K views · 57 likes
· 2 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
25. Free Speech as Hate Speech Fallacy
Some say free speech advocates defend free speech because they like, or agree with, fake news and hate speech. This isn’t true: most advocates of free speech abominate hate speech. They just believe censorship creates an even worse problem.
1.9K views · 74 likes
· 4 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
23. Normalization of Censorship
Censorship habituates people to see the state as an arbiter of truth. People then slowly get used to the fact that the state watches people, polices their opinions, defines what can be thought and expressed, punishes for “incorrect” views, etc.
4K views · 79 likes
· 5 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
24. Cost of Opportunity
Most states have very limited resources. They should be fighting real crime rather than wasting time and resources policing the free exchange of ideas.
1.7K views · 67 likes
· 4 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
22. Democratic Judgment (aka Self-Government)
If democracy is based on deliberation by its citizens, there needs to be unlimited space for the exchange of ideas, information, arguments and opinions so that the people are able to make informed decisions.
2.4K views · 63 likes
· 4 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
21. Democratic Fairness
If an authority or assembly is deliberating about an issue that affects your life or your company, it is fair and just that you have unconditional freedom to say whatever you think about that deliberation.
1.7K views · 64 likes
· 4 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
20. Killing the Patient
Some say we need to restrict free speech to protect democracy. But democracy exists to protect our freedoms, not the other way around. Restricting speech to protect democracy is like killing the patient to administer medicine better.
1.7K views · 68 likes
· 3 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
19.1 Restrictions on free speech backfire: they undermine the legitimacy of the very system they should protect.
Allowing anti-democratic speech is a gambit: it feels you are giving democracy away, but in reality you are strengthening it by reinforcing its legitimacy.
2.4K views · 73 likes
· 3 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
19. Gambit of Free Speech
Censorship does not protect democracy; it de-legitimizes it. When people do not have a voice in the current regime, they stop trusting democracy, and start pondering alternatives (including violent ones).
2.4K views · 75 likes
· 5 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
18. Free Speech Makes Free People
It is through speech that we denounce violations and figh for new freedoms (e.g. the civil rights movement). As @jordanbpeterson states, “the right to freedom of speech is central because it’s the right by which you defend all other rights.”
1.9K views · 70 likes
· 4 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
17.1 There are those who will take any idea, good or bad, as inspiration for evil deeds. They might read the Book of Genesis and kill their brother. But we cannot let these individuals undermine free speech and level down the whole public debate in our society.
3.5K views · 75 likes
· 4 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
17. The Negative Tendency Fallacy
Some argue that jokes, porn, games, songs or books may lead to violence and should be censored. But as @jon_rauch puts it, “to ban books or words which cretins find exciting is to let the very lowest among us determine what we may read or hear.”
2.2K views · 70 likes
· 3 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
16. Diversity
Free speech facilitates “the flourishing of expression that is diverse in every sense, including cultural”, as Nadine Strossen states. This also fosters tolerance, as we learn to live with, and even to appreciate, different beliefs, traditions, and lifestyles.
1.8K views · 73 likes
· 5 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
14. The Harm and Offense Fallacy
Some claim harmful speech adds nothing to public debate and should be prohibited.
Speech can indeed be harmful, but a policy cannot be designed based on personal sensibilities. People may be offended by anything, even by our mere existence.
1.9K views · 76 likes
· 6 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione
7 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 100K–1M follower. arriva ben oltre il proprio pubblico, e quel pubblico reagisce.
Visualizzazioni mediane40 342questo account4 544mediana per 100K–1M
Copertura, %29.37%questo account1.75%mediana per 100K–1M
Interazione, %5.25%questo account1.35%mediana per 100K–1M
| Metrica | Questo account | Mediana per 100K–1M | Rapporto |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visualizzazioni mediane per post | 40 342 | 4 544 | 8.88× |
| Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower) | 29.37% | 1.75% | 16.8× |
| Tasso di interazione | 5.25% | 1.35% | 3.88× |
Altri account di questa fascia → Confronta con un altro account → Come sono costruiti questi parametri →
Growth & engagement
How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.
Views per post
1.3K19 Jun
1.7K
1.4K
2.7K
4.2K
4.9K
785
163.9K25 Aug
13.2K27 Aug
4.4K
66.1K31 Aug
46.4K1 Sep
40.3K
3.5K
Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.
Engagement rate per post
4.23%19 Jun
3.66%
4.32%
2.48%
1.61%
1.22%
2.80%
0.61%25 Aug
6.27%27 Aug
2.67%
0.89%31 Aug
5.25%1 Sep
30.90%
11.82%
Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 1.35%.
What the audience does
Likes79.7%15 666 in total
Reposts15.2%2 982 in total
Replies4.0%786 in total
Bookmarks1.1%210 in total
Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.
The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.
Account simili
Baabar ✓
@Baabarniitlelch
274.7K followers
· 56.3K posts
z
@zekkenVAL
274.7K followers
· 7.5K posts
Haus of Decline
@hausofdecline
274.7K followers
· 25.7K posts
Jaromir Jagr
@68Jagr
274.7K followers
· 160 posts
Myrna 𝕏 ✓
@GigaBeers
274.6K followers
· 448.5K posts
Wykrhm Reddy
@wykrhm
274.6K followers
· 18.8K posts
MAG COİN ✓
@btcoinmag
274.6K followers
· 31.8K posts
Alex Phillips ✓
@ThatAlexWoman
274.6K followers
· 15.2K posts