tweetindex
IT

Omid Malekan ✓

@malekanoms · joined 07 Jul 2009

Explainer-in-Chief & Adjunct Professor @Columbia_Biz Es Muss Sein

13 317Followers
601Following
4 548Posts total
692.8KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

@malekanoms The bank lobby arguments have been so weak, and so easily falsifiable, that I have wondered whether this is just the associations making noise to justify their fees? Put differently, the senseless pushback could be a bank lobby thing, not a bank thing. I know the f 2.8K views · 34 likes · 0 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
You can find it on page 463 of this archive from the hearing: https://t.co/R0XImiT4Z1 6.4K views · 57 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Many of us have mentioned how the stablecoin yield debate playing out in Clarity, and the arguments made against yield by the bank trades, mirror the battle over money market funds in the 1970s. Well here's some proof. Here's a letter submitted by the Independent Bankers https:/
351K views · 932 likes · 236 reposts · 44 replies Open on X →
I don't generally comment on AI here because the one thing a decade+ of trying to understand one emerging domain has taught me is that I don't know much about anything. But I'll say this: the past 24 hours has made it clear to me that there is a historic bubble in the egos of 2.4K views · 43 likes · 7 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
The amazing thing about the targeted (and dare I say immoral) regulatory takedown of Silvergate is how it happened despite bank regulators doing everything they can to bail out far more irresponsible banks before and since. Calls into question the entire construct. First, give 2.7K views · 36 likes · 6 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
It's a shame that the Biden Administration targeted Silvergate during their war on crypto. They were one of the only banks in the country with ample reserves to stomach a run on the bank. Proud to call Alan Lane a friend. https://t.co/vzH2m4wp8a https://t.co/KVIHlymO2b
19.9K views · 93 likes · 14 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@malekanoms @lex_node The key sentence here: “Now, obviously we don’t want shady SPVs and a million different pass through exposure products with different rights that fragment liquidity.” Every issuer I talk to loves the idea of more distribution and hates the idea of undisclo 52 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@malekanoms well companies already don't know who their stockholders are...if anyone is making the “companies need to know exactly who their shareholders are” argument they fundamentally do not understand how public equity markets work... 863 views · 19 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
The other funny thing about people who complain “token holders aren’t actual shareholders!!” Is they clearly don’t understand how public US equities work. The only true shareholder is the CSD, in this case a subsidiary of the DTCC. The rest of us only get derivatives. True for 8.3K views · 40 likes · 17 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →
@malekanoms Also feels a bit like fighting the inevitable. If the market has permissionless rails and demand these things will exist, which means you either embrace it and use it to your benefit or cope and have one less tool relative to your competitors. 551 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Counterpoint: The companies that embrace full on tokenization of their capital and distribution in every way possible will have the lowest cost of capital on the planet, ceteris paribus. This is the finance 101 point that all the AML/KYC fanboys and “companies need to know 67.6K views · 131 likes · 28 reposts · 17 replies Open on X →
If you follow the headlines, seemingly not a day goes by without an announcement of a new bank-centric effort to embrace tokenization or stablecoins. Many banks are now involved in over a dozen initiatives. There are two ways to interpret this: The first is that firms like 8.3K views · 64 likes · 15 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
JUST IN: 21 major global banks including @BankofAmerica, @Citi, @GoldmanSachs, @DeutscheBank, and @UBS, just committed to launching a joint stablecoin company, targeting a USD-denominated stablecoin to go live in H1 2027. https://t.co/mLjq1p1Nqq
221.9K views · 931 likes · 224 reposts · 92 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

13 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. arriva a molti, ma pochi di loro reagiscono.

Visualizzazioni mediane6 369questo account924mediana per 10K–100K
Copertura, %47.83%questo account3.62%mediana per 10K–100K
Interazione, %1.04%questo account1.52%mediana per 10K–100K
MetricaQuesto accountMediana per 10K–100KRapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post6 3699246.89×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)47.83%3.62%13.2×
Tasso di interazione1.04%1.52%0.68×

Altri account di questa fascia →   Confronta con un altro account →   Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

221.9K1 Sep
8.3K
67.6K4 Sep
551
8.3K
863
52
19.9K8 Sep
2.7K9 Sep
2.4K
351K14 Sep
6.4K
2.8K

Last 13 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.56%1 Sep
1.04%
0.27%4 Sep
1.09%
0.79%
2.55%
3.85%
0.56%8 Sep
1.64%9 Sep
2.17%
0.36%14 Sep
0.97%
1.34%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes69.6%2 388 in total
Reposts16.0%550 in total
Replies5.4%186 in total
Quotes1.7%57 in total
Bookmarks7.3%249 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Account simili