Radiology

@radiology_rsna · Chicago, IL · joined 14 Apr 2009

A monthly journal devoted to clinical radiology and allied sciences, owned and published by RSNA. Follow @RSNA for organizational updates.

60 776Followers

350Following

5 786Posts total

20.3KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

Radiology@radiology_rsna16 Sep

Drs. Yang and Wu present a case of desmoplastic fibroma of bone in the distal femur, a rare, locally aggressive tumor showing an expansile lytic lesion, without periosteal reaction, and the characteristic root-like bone remnants. https://t.co/1qEUy2VKe1 1.6K views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Radiology@radiology_rsna15 Sep

🚨 New episode of the @radiology_rsna podcast is now available! 🚨 @LindaChuMD joins @nguyen_jie, Drs. Lawrence & Davis to discuss standardized meniscus MRI reporting, reporting terminology, surgical planning, & improving communication across patient care https://t.co/0ITv7GAjCa 1.9K views · 6 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Radiology@radiology_rsna15 Sep

Dr. Luo et al review the bench to bedside evidence for histotripsy, a noninvasive focused ultrasound technique that destroys tumors through acoustic cavitation rather than heat, in the treatment of HCC and future directions for the technology. https://t.co/yEGrWgKeRk 2.1K views · 10 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Radiology@radiology_rsna14 Sep

Drs. @dyannotdiane & @tatcantarelli comment on the work by Lin et al developing a model for femoral neck fractures on radiographs, questioning external validity, and suggest moving the AI focus from detection to meaningfully improving patient care. https://t.co/ULPLCvUUwo 2.2K views · 7 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Radiology@radiology_rsna13 Sep

In this editorial, Dr. @kenlee8799 and @ZachStewartMD comment on the study by Dr. Macía-Suárez et al using SWE and SMI, which bolsters the foundation of multiparametric US soft tissue tumor evaluation and posits the next implementation challenge, https://t.co/KB52IlcAb2 2.1K views · 5 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Radiology@radiology_rsna3 Sep

In this prospective study, gallium 68 NK224 PET/CT enabled whole-body assessment of PD-L1 heterogeneity in NSCLC and identified lesion-level heterogeneity not captured through biopsies; higher uptake was associated with greater tumor shrinkage. https://t.co/wO8Ju1lDZf https://t.c

2.1K views · 14 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Radiology@radiology_rsna2 Sep

Clinical context shapes radiology. This editorial examines how LLM-generated histories may reduce chart review burden, provide timely clinical context, bridge communication gaps, and support informed imaging decisions. @eniscy @DrNukeDav @UTMBRadiology https://t.co/vzC47TcZgJ 2.1K views · 6 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Radiology@radiology_rsna31 Aug

What can domain-specific pretraining add to DBT? This editorial reflects on the DBT-DINO study by Dorfner and colleagues, discussing improved breast density classification but not lesion detection or 5-year risk prediction. @PittRadiology https://t.co/OzVJHTId1M 2.1K views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Radiology@radiology_rsna31 Aug

This editorial discusses SCAN-MRI, an imaging-based risk stratification approach that integrates routine cardiac MRI markers of diabetic myocardial remodeling and dysfunction into a practical clinical tool. @TilmanEmrich @MUSCcvi https://t.co/hsPL2AcVWB 2.1K views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Radiology@radiology_rsna30 Aug

Can T2 mapping solve a classic bedside dilemma in hemophilia? Hemarthrosis and inflammatory effusion cannot be reliably distinguished clinically or at conventional imaging. This editorial examines noninvasive T2 mapping as a potential solution. https://t.co/8ozJ4FnMXr 2.1K views · 8 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

10 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. copertura nella norma per la sua dimensione, reazione più debole della media.

Visualizzazioni mediane2 102questo account924mediana per 10K–100K

Copertura, %3.46%questo account3.62%mediana per 10K–100K

Interazione, %0.41%questo account1.52%mediana per 10K–100K

Metrica	Questo account	Mediana per 10K–100K	Rapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post	2 102	924	2.27×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)	3.46%	3.62%	0.96×
Tasso di interazione	0.41%	1.52%	0.27×

Altri account di questa fascia → Confronta con un altro account → Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

2.1K30 Aug

2.1K31 Aug

2.1K

2.1K2 Sep

2.1K3 Sep

2.1K13 Sep

2.2K14 Sep

2.1K15 Sep

1.9K

1.6K16 Sep

Last 10 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.47%30 Aug

0.15%31 Aug

0.10%

0.39%2 Sep

0.86%3 Sep

0.38%13 Sep

0.46%14 Sep

0.61%15 Sep

0.42%

0.00%16 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes68.2%60 in total

Reposts19.3%17 in total

Replies2.3%2 in total

Quotes1.1%1 in total

Bookmarks9.1%8 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.