Sam Haselby

@samhaselby

Historian, wrote _The Origins of American Religious Nationalism_; Eagle Scout, Wisconsinite.

24 292Followers

1 120Following

96 090Posts total

167KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

Sam Haselby@samhaselby7 Sep

@samhaselby ah yes, the 18th century, famously a century without the category of "white" people https://t.co/0CYLj5apcn

1.5K views · 43 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Sam Haselby@samhaselby6 Sep

But dividing the big early modern world into "white" or "Black" is entirely a way of recasting other histories according to modern US notions of race and freedom. It's entirely a form of US imperialism by people who think they are fighting imperialism. 7.9K views · 234 likes · 8 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Sam Haselby@samhaselby6 Sep

Most "white" people (a category didn't exist in the 15th, 16th, 17th, or 18th century) also came to the Americas in some form of unfreedom, indentured servitude, or (at the time) marriage. So if one wants to do "settler colonial" history by "race", Black people are also settlers. 29.6K views · 180 likes · 3 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →

Sam Haselby@samhaselby6 Sep

@samhaselby American "radical liberal" landback is basically blood and soil nationalism but "good". It shows that there is a profoundly conservative impulse amongst those who posture as radical. 5.6K views · 133 likes · 8 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Sam Haselby@samhaselby6 Sep

This kind of thing is a good example of negative American exceptionalism, and ahistorical US-centrism. All the Americas are "settler colonial" and modern US racial ideology is a kind of imperial, ahistorical way to understand the early modern European conquest of the Americas. 122.4K views · 1.4K likes · 108 reposts · 18 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

5 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. arriva ben oltre il proprio pubblico, e quel pubblico reagisce.

Visualizzazioni mediane7 922questo account924mediana per 10K–100K

Copertura, %32.61%questo account3.62%mediana per 10K–100K

Interazione, %2.59%questo account1.52%mediana per 10K–100K

Metrica	Questo account	Mediana per 10K–100K	Rapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post	7 922	924	8.57×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)	32.61%	3.62%	9.01×
Tasso di interazione	2.59%	1.52%	1.70×

Altri account di questa fascia → Confronta con un altro account → Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

122.4K6 Sep

5.6K

29.6K

7.9K

1.5K7 Sep

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.29%6 Sep

2.59%

0.71%

3.14%

2.93%7 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes75.2%2 037 in total

Reposts4.8%129 in total

Replies1.4%38 in total

Quotes0.9%25 in total

Bookmarks17.7%481 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ultimi post

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Account simili