tweetindex
IT

SCOTUS Wire ✓

@scotus_wire · joined 05 Feb 2021

Breaking news from courts across the nation.

72 368Followers
343Following
3 217Posts total
11MViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

@scotus_wire So if I want to avoid my phone being searched, I should just come cross the border illegally. Because then once I'm here I have all the Constitutional rights of any citizen and they won't be able to touch it. Got it. 2.1K views · 58 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Read the ruling here: https://t.co/4iEg7wereZ 7.8K views · 35 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Judge Lee concurred only in the judgment and rejected suspicionless cellphone searches, arguing that phones are too privacy-invasive to be “routine.” She agreed no warrant or probable cause was required but would leave open what level of individualized suspicion is necessary. 8.5K views · 58 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
The court left open whether more intrusive forensic searches of electronic devices may require reasonable suspicion. The ruling applies to manual searches like those here, where officers scrolled through the phone and photographed information they found. 8.2K views · 70 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The court declined to extend Riley v. California, which generally requires a warrant to search a cellphone incident to arrest. It reasoned that Riley involved a different exception, while border searches rest on the sovereign’s power to control who and what enters the country. 9K views · 105 likes · 5 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
NEW: The Second Circuit ruled that federal officers may manually search travelers’ cellphones at the border without a warrant, probable cause, reasonable suspicion, or any individualized suspicion, holding that such searches are “routine” border searches. https://t.co/nNbwSzF5b9
135.6K views · 1.9K likes · 493 reposts · 109 replies Open on X →
@scotus_wire This is another Win for Ron against the Left and the LEFT WING AAP which has NO BUSINESS Gender Transitioning Surgery to MINORS! It is appalling! Minors are in NO WAY MENTALLY MATURE enough to make such a decision that will affect the rest of their lives!! Well done 741 views · 38 likes · 1 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
Read the ruling here: https://t.co/dBwEiK5eUR 2.2K views · 27 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Judge Kolar takes a middle course. He agrees the case is moot and declines to define the bad-faith exception, but warns that prosecutors can use costly litigation as a “heckler’s veto” and says federal intervention may be warranted when a state prosecutor goes too far. 2.3K views · 41 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Judge Scudder, joined by Chief Judge Brennan and Judges St. Eve and Kirsch, says the injunction “worked a grievous blow” to federalism. He argues the Younger exception is extraordinarily narrow, and the full court should have said the injunction “never should have issued.” 1.5K views · 44 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Judge Hamilton, joined by Judge Jackson-Akiwumi, says the case implicated First Amendment rights as well as federalism and calls Younger’s bad-faith exception a “constitutional safety valve.” He says Kennelly made “detailed and sound” findings supporting it. 1.6K views · 41 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The dispute began when a Chicago federal judge found that AG Uthmeier was likely pursuing the Florida state case against the AAP in bad faith, blocking him from continuing it under a narrow exception to the general rule against federal interference with state proceedings. 4.3K views · 71 likes · 7 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The full court does not decide whether the injunction was lawful. Once Judge Matthew Kennelly vacates it on remand, the Seventh Circuit says there will be no order left to appeal, and the appeal will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 2.2K views · 56 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
BREAKING: The Seventh Circuit cleared the way for Florida’s lawsuit against the American Academy of Pediatrics over transgender treatments for minors to proceed, ending the court’s rare initial en banc review after the AAP voluntarily dismissed its federal case in Chicago. https:
158.9K views · 1.3K likes · 259 reposts · 17 replies Open on X →
UPDATE: https://t.co/PYNhih9stQ 4.3K views · 25 likes · 6 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
🚨 Missouri redistricting challengers asked the Supreme Court to pause a federal judge’s ruling requiring the use of the state’s 2025 congressional map, minutes after a unanimous Eighth Circuit panel declined to intervene. Justice Kavanaugh ordered a response by 10am tomorrow. h
23.8K views · 459 likes · 98 reposts · 24 replies Open on X →
@scotus_wire Libs told me that 8th Circuit overturning the lower Federal Judge was guaranteed. 1.9K views · 53 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
The Temporary Restraining Order is set to expire after 14 days -- Sept. 22. Chief Judge Stephen Clark is likeky to rule on a preliminary injunction before then. Read the brief order by the 8th Circuit here: https://t.co/qxPJ3koDIb 7.7K views · 93 likes · 4 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
The panel cited precedent that Temporary Restraining Orders are generally not appealable. If the district court issues a preliminary injunction, that order would be immediately appealable, giving the Eighth Circuit a clearer path to review the constitutional merits. 8.2K views · 127 likes · 7 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
🚨 The Eighth Circuit has left in place a federal judge’s order requiring Missouri to use its 2025 congressional map, saying it either lacks jurisdiction over the TRO or the challengers have not met the requirements for a stay. https://t.co/TZKgCKBs7M
99.7K views · 1.1K likes · 233 reposts · 51 replies Open on X →
@scotus_wire Didn't realise lower court judges could overrule the Supreme Court 11.2K views · 267 likes · 0 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →
Here's an explainer on this case, which is separate from the appeal of the Missouri Supreme Court's ruling (which Justice Kavanaigh just rejected). https://t.co/5BcSNwDr4J 61.9K views · 180 likes · 16 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →
Read the ruling here: https://t.co/k5a7PFRQB1 44.5K views · 174 likes · 11 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
The judge also invoked Purcell “in reverse,” reasoning that using the 2025 map preserves the election rules voters, candidates and officials already relied on. The TRO lasts 14 days while the court considers a preliminary injunction. 49.9K views · 298 likes · 9 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Clark says changing maps after Missouri already held its primary would effectively nullify some voters’ primary votes by moving them into districts where they had no opportunity to help select the nominees appearing in November. 56K views · 471 likes · 28 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
Chief Judge Stephen Clark rejected the challengers’ Elections Clause argument, ruling Missouri may subject congressional redistricting to a referendum. But he found they are highly likely to prevail under Article I §2 and the Equal Protection Clause. 48.5K views · 349 likes · 27 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@scotus_wire “…the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” is pretty self explanatory. 253 views · 14 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
🚨 Rep. Bob Onder, GOP congressional nominee Rick Brattin, and two Missouri voters have sued in federal court to keep Missouri’s 2025 congressional map in place for November despite the state Supreme Court’s ruling requiring a return to the 2022 districts. https://t.co/2QfA6Fz67H
134.7K views · 653 likes · 138 reposts · 21 replies Open on X →
@scotus_wire The AR-15 is no different than any other rifle. It is only banned based upon how it looks rather than any objective factor that makes it more dangerous. The only reason some states ban it is because a lot of voters are ignorant. That does not seem to be a constitu 684 views · 16 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@scotus_wire any law repugnant to the constitution is not a law at all. 982 views · 29 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

58 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. arriva a più persone rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione.

Visualizzazioni mediane13 482questo account924mediana per 10K–100K
Copertura, %18.63%questo account3.62%mediana per 10K–100K
Interazione, %1.42%questo account1.52%mediana per 10K–100K
MetricaQuesto accountMediana per 10K–100KRapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post13 48292414.6×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)18.63%3.62%5.15×
Tasso di interazione1.42%1.52%0.93×

Altri account di questa fascia →   Confronta con un altro account →   Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

158.9K14 Sep
2.2K
4.3K
1.6K
1.5K
2.3K
2.2K
741
135.6K17 Sep
9K
8.2K
8.5K
7.8K
2.1K

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.02%14 Sep
2.72%
1.83%
2.77%
3.20%
1.88%
1.29%
5.80%
1.92%17 Sep
1.25%
0.89%
0.72%
0.45%
2.89%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes77.5%8 113 in total
Reposts13.0%1 357 in total
Replies2.7%285 in total
Quotes1.6%170 in total
Bookmarks5.1%538 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Account simili