tweetindex
IT

Seb ⚛️ ThisWeekInReact.com ✓

@sebastienlorber · 📨 For React Experts 👇 · joined 17 May 2009

🔥 Join 40k devs - Stay up-to-date with React: • 📨 https://t.co/DvLGHeLY5G • @ThisWeekInReact • @docusaurus maintainer • 🇫🇷

54 535Followers
4 640Following
31 281Posts total
212.7KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

Nice! Also interesting to see the lib pushing back on what's in the official React docs 😆, but the justification makes sense https://t.co/jDysyATuP0
9.7K views · 64 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Interesting experiment to see the cost of abstractions on AI costs Apparently, inlining, reducing indirection, and co-locating things can significantly reduce your agents' bill Example: React patterns increase AI costs Not surprised agents handle better CSS-in-JS / Tailwind ht
10.9K views · 61 likes · 2 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Motion 13.4 introduces <AnimateView /> A lightweight view transitions component built on React's new ViewTransition API. Adds spring support, dynamic targets, animation controls, and a simple props API - no more wrangling pseudo selectors! https://t.co/97DIWUjCI4
0:11
28.3K views · 509 likes · 23 reposts · 13 replies Open on X →
💡 JSPI = JavaScript Promise Integration for WebAssembly "Await for Wasm code" Now in all browsers 🎉 Recently added to Safari and Firefox Looks like an important primitive for native languages C/C++/Rust, etc compiling to Wasm https://t.co/AXzpmi7Rno
11.5K views · 155 likes · 14 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Safari 27 supports JSPI, a magic WebAssembly capability for sync native code to suspend on an async 𝙿𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚎. On https://t.co/3Z4NESzNKd, libfx uses the built-in browser 𝚏𝚎𝚝𝚌𝚑 stack to make API calls. As more code goes native, I expect WebAssembly to play a huge role https://t.c
0:18
56.7K views · 462 likes · 26 reposts · 38 replies Open on X →
@sebastienlorber This is amazing, finally! 847 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Afaik the original demo uses <pre contenteditable="plaintext-only"> + Range + CSS Custom Highlights But we can now syntax-highlight <textarea> + <input> too, using OpaqueRange Check @hypeddev article for more details here: https://t.co/sHrEMS2WPs 3.2K views · 9 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
My demo is entirely vibe-coded; I just had the idea to give it a try Astra coded this and improved it from the original demo: highlights do not erase as you type https://t.co/lyQQF1Yf5e 1.6K views · 10 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
💡 Universal syntax highlighter. In a <textarea> In 2026 (Chrome 152+), you can syntax-highlight different programming languages within the same <textarea> and get decent results Using the 🆕 OpaqueRange web API Works for <textarea>, even <input> Demo: https://t.co/EUfgSdPBVy ht
0:59
66.4K views · 481 likes · 42 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →
This Week In React 296 ⚛️ - React 19.3 - DevTools - Next.js chunking - cn - 3D Maps - Effective-RSC - Vidact - Unified Flow 📱 - 0.88 RC - Expo Modules v2 preview - RN QuickJS - Goldie - ContinuedTask 🍿 Read/subscribe: https://t.co/r4LA2QRc3q ✍️ @jaworek3211 & I https://t.co/yVl
5.5K views · 66 likes · 12 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Highlighting a range of text inside a form field. @hypeddev shows how OpaqueRange brings the CSS Custom Highlight API to form controls: call createValueRange() and style the result with ::highlight(). Chromium 152 only for now. #chrome #js https://t.co/NahY8F1Ak4 https://t.co/gY
Title “Using the OpaqueRange API with the CSS Custom Highlight API” with parts of it highlighted in pink and green, the author’s photo, three code blocks, and “olliewilliams.xyz”.
5.7K views · 12 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
My new article (human written) can help you to save 30% on your AI agents bill. "The Cost of Abstraction for Humans and AI Agents" Over-abstraction doesn't just make code harder for humans to digest. AI agents suffer too. https://t.co/0x80uGiKdC 12.2K views · 17 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

12 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. arriva a molti, ma pochi di loro reagiscono.

Visualizzazioni mediane10 314questo account924mediana per 10K–100K
Copertura, %18.91%questo account3.62%mediana per 10K–100K
Interazione, %0.67%questo account1.52%mediana per 10K–100K
MetricaQuesto accountMediana per 10K–100KRapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post10 31492411.2×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)18.91%3.62%5.22×
Tasso di interazione0.67%1.52%0.44×

Altri account di questa fascia →   Confronta con un altro account →   Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

12.2K28 Aug
5.7K31 Aug
5.5K9 Sep
66.4K15 Sep
1.6K
3.2K
847
56.7K
11.5K16 Sep
28.3K
10.9K
9.7K

Last 12 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.17%28 Aug
0.28%31 Aug
1.43%9 Sep
0.81%15 Sep
0.63%
0.34%
0.47%
0.94%
1.51%16 Sep
1.94%
0.60%
0.70%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes64.7%1 849 in total
Reposts4.4%127 in total
Replies2.5%71 in total
Quotes0.7%21 in total
Bookmarks27.7%792 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Account simili