tweetindex
PT

Erick Erickson ✓

@EWErickson · Uranus · joined 15 Jan 2007

Christian broadcaster. Conservative truth-teller. Live on-air daily — faith, politics, and clarity in a noisy world. Truth over tribe.

270 551Followers
3 529Following
124 929Posts total
4.1MViews on collected posts

Posts recentes

@EWErickson You are no different than a woke leftist at this point. 14.6K views · 2.8K likes · 28 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →
@EWErickson "White men have the gall to be mad about their ethnic replacement and are getting involved politically" Do you read these before you type them out? 34.9K views · 5K likes · 123 reposts · 19 replies Open on X →
@EWErickson About that group of white guys… https://t.co/WlCIp154ky
24.9K views · 3.1K likes · 59 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
@EWErickson “A group of white guys have subtly inserted themselves into conservative institutions and church organizations.” Do you hear yourself? We have every right to participate in political and religious governance. This hackery is filled with the exact spite you accuse oth 15.5K views · 1.6K likes · 33 reposts · 17 replies Open on X →
A group of white guys have subtly inserted themselves into conservative institutions and church organizations. They all embrace racial grievances. To varying degrees, they embrace white nationalism, antisemitism, and even Nazi sympathies. They are getting added to conservative 1.9M views · 3.8K likes · 750 reposts · 1.9K replies Open on X →
@EWErickson Seems relevant- https://t.co/mZmvOfNiVH
2.2K views · 18 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@EWErickson Maybe @SecScottBessent should have the IRS check in to that. 1.5K views · 22 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@EWErickson How do they keep their tax exempt status? 3.1K views · 22 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Here’s a church raising money for a candidate for office in Georgia with checks made payable directly to the candidate. https://t.co/IG7ZMtxe7d
55.4K views · 324 likes · 52 reposts · 49 replies Open on X →
@EWErickson Glorious. Give me Utah and Arizona all day long. https://t.co/QESlGcheHD
221 views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@EWErickson https://t.co/yZ9rL5orTc
328 views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@EWErickson Post a real photo you took. No context. https://t.co/X7FuDJ7Xrm
922 views · 11 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Post a real photo you took, no context. https://t.co/K1yZPbsjUV
54.1K views · 330 likes · 6 reposts · 239 replies Open on X →
Post a real photo you took, no context. https://t.co/8mcTkvHOmn
45.7K views · 165 likes · 4 reposts · 110 replies Open on X →
@EWErickson Why is it these "voices" in people's head never tell them to mow the grass or make dinner? These voices always seem very conveniently tailored to allow them to commit violence and later claim they had no power to stop it 2.3K views · 41 likes · 0 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
@EWErickson None of that is evidence of “insanity…” we would never hold murderers accountable if we considered the act of murder itself “evidence” of “insanity.” 4.7K views · 92 likes · 2 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
@EWErickson That seems like an extraordinarily stupid way to write the law, for what that’s worth. 20.6K views · 255 likes · 0 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
Time for 4 Things: https://t.co/usKG2SzCXi https://t.co/25J4wIwaWi 3.9K views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
While everyone is worked up about data centers and artificial intelligence, the real danger is the algorithm. https://t.co/zFLhKfDKnV 5.2K views · 28 likes · 3 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →
@EWErickson Any blame for midterm losses are on John Thune, RINOs and democrats who voted party line to discredit DJTs leadership and accomplishments 28 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@EWErickson What you are suggesting is that someone cannot commit an act of unspeakable horror unless they are insane. Or maybe they’re sane but if they attempt suicide they are definitely insane? 110 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@EWErickson @sethjlevy I didn’t know he was a legal expert too 115 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@EWErickson The jury will eventually find Lindsay Clancy guilty. 322 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
The Twitter mob is badly misreading the situation in the Lindsay Clancy case and has forgotten a key quirk the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. https://t.co/8gVdCGLsGA 7.3K views · 13 likes · 1 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
@EWErickson What ? You didn’t go to Boston university ? 13 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Folks, AI is not nearly the danger people think it is. And the algorithm is far more dangerous than people realize. We're fighting the wrong fight. https://t.co/8gVdCGM0w8 5.8K views · 18 likes · 0 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
@EWErickson Why this zero sum game? Without Paxton we all lose the Senate. Cornyn was/is a loser turd. 2K views · 195 likes · 12 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →
@EWErickson Erick - they spent $150million trying to defeat Paxton. Maybe they should have thought about that. 6K views · 288 likes · 9 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
@EWErickson Swamp Republicans throwing a hissy fit because their preferred candidate lost a primary by 30 points is about the most predictable thing ever. And yes, I think keeping Texas's Senate seat is far more important than keeping any of the others because Texas can't fall or 27.1K views · 207 likes · 20 reposts · 19 replies Open on X →
Out Now: https://t.co/oSzzfjSKP8 https://t.co/4w90XBbyNW 16.4K views · 7 likes · 1 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

31 posts dos últimos 90 dias, ao lado da faixa de 100K–1M seguidores. aparece muito além do próprio público, e esse público reage.

Mediana de visualizações5 235esta conta5 983mediana para 100K–1M
Alcance, %1.93%esta conta1.49%mediana para 100K–1M
Engajamento, %1.16%esta conta0.93%mediana para 100K–1M
MétricaEsta contaMediana para 100K–1MProporção
Mediana de visualizações por post5 2355 9830.87×
Alcance (visualizações ÷ seguidores)1.93%1.49%1.30×
Taxa de engajamento1.16%0.93%1.25×

Outras contas desta faixa →   Comparar com outra conta →   Como estas referências são construídas →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

45.7K7 Sep
54.1K
922
328
221
55.4K13 Sep
3.1K
1.5K
2.2K14 Sep
1.9M16 Sep
15.5K
24.9K
34.9K
14.6K

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.69%7 Sep
1.16%
1.52%
2.74%
4.52%
0.79%13 Sep
0.80%
1.45%
0.90%14 Sep
0.37%16 Sep
10.67%
12.81%
14.75%
19.26%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes75.6%18 326 in total
Reposts4.6%1 104 in total
Replies10.0%2 435 in total
Quotes2.7%644 in total
Bookmarks7.1%1 722 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Contas semelhantes