Matti H. Virtanen ✓
@MVirtanen · Suomi · joined 21 Feb 2009
Olisi oltava empaattinen ja samalla etäinen - melkein kyyninen, mutta ei ihan. Lukija ihmetelköön: onko kirjoittaja lintu vai kala? - Simopekka Nortamo.
19 105Followers
10 470Following
63 667Posts total
81.3KViews on collected posts
Posts recentes
Procurando novos posts…
@MVirtanen Sen pitää olla avoin kaikille, jos meinaamme kutsua Suomea oikeusvaltioksi.
1 views · 0 likes
· 0 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
Huomenna selviää Ruotsin vaalitulos, kun ulkomailla asuvien äänet on laskettu. Kumpaakos veikataan voittajaksi: kotimaan äänillä niukasti johtavaa vasemmisto-keskustaa vai ekspattien yleensä suosimaa porvariblokkia?
2K views · 4 likes
· 0 reposts · 8 replies
Open on X →
ChatGPT myöntää valehtelevansa. Olisiko tämä sangen inhimillinen ominaisuus todiste tietoisuudesta? https://t.co/w3hrDRezdX
903 views · 11 likes
· 0 reposts · 4 replies
Open on X →
@MVirtanen Ei onnistu pitkään aikaan.
Ihan turhaan huudellaan
48 views · 1 likes
· 0 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
Vinkki Supolle: Tiitisen lista myös tutkijoiden käyttöön.
5.6K views · 127 likes
· 7 reposts · 4 replies
Open on X →
Pitääkö muka olla uusnatsitaustaa ymmärtääkseen mitä Ruotsissa juuri tapahtui?
3K views · 40 likes
· 0 reposts · 5 replies
Open on X →
@MVirtanen Nyt kävi niin kuin ajattelin että voi käydä vasta vuosien päästä
4.9K views · 20 likes
· 1 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
@MVirtanen 1/n "Was confirmed" - ilmastodenialistien jatkuvasti käyttämä argumentti on se, että oikeassa tieteessä ei ole lopullista konsensusta. Nytkö sitten yksittäinen tutkimus hyvin vaikeasti tutkittavasta asiasta pakottaa konsensukseen, kun kyse on sinulle mieluisasta näkemy
117 views · 12 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Conclusions supported by Science (at least the magazine). https://t.co/HrywzwBaIe
492 views · 1 likes
· 0 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
Golfvirta on stabiili. AMOC ei romahda. Get over it.
908 views · 8 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Bad news for the AMOC fear mongerers.
From Science Magazine,
🗨️ “Yet for all the alarming headlines, most climate researchers think the AMOC is more resilient than these worst case scenarios make it seem. [S]tudies of the AMOC’s present behavior do not yet show any clear signs
12.1K views · 261 likes
· 72 reposts · 9 replies
Open on X →
"These are stress tests. They are not forecasts. They assume strong anthropogenic (human caused) forcing and then examine how models behave. The high-end emission scenarios have increasingly been rejected, even by those who argue humans are causing climate change, as being
498 views · 2 likes
· 0 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
And here is a nice AI generated visual summary of the article, by the nice folks at https://t.co/t5sEO2A63h
https://t.co/YVLcULR0zt
1.1K views · 7 likes
· 2 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Luckily, we still have people around us who remember Climategate and can see the pattern. Thank you, Dr. @MatthewWielicki.
https://t.co/7Vfu1xeCBx
1.2K views · 11 likes
· 0 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
One more time, for all who fear that winter is coming. (Yes it is, but not in your lifetime.) #AMOC #Gulf_Stream
Will Northern Europe be plunged into a new Ice Age? https://t.co/v24V35Av4r
44.2K views · 52 likes
· 3 reposts · 13 replies
Open on X →
Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte
9 posts dos últimos 90 dias, ao lado da faixa de 10K–100K seguidores. aparece para mais gente do que contas do mesmo porte.
Mediana de visualizações1 992esta conta924mediana para 10K–100K
Alcance, %10.43%esta conta3.62%mediana para 10K–100K
Engajamento, %1.50%esta conta1.52%mediana para 10K–100K
| Métrica | Esta conta | Mediana para 10K–100K | Proporção |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mediana de visualizações por post | 1 992 | 924 | 2.16× |
| Alcance (visualizações ÷ seguidores) | 10.43% | 3.62% | 2.88× |
| Taxa de engajamento | 1.50% | 1.52% | 0.98× |
Outras contas desta faixa → Comparar com outra conta → Como estas referências são construídas →
Growth & engagement
How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.
Views per post
49821 Apr
12.1K20 Jun
90821 Jun
49224 Jun
11730 Jun
4.9K15 Sep
3K
4.3K
5.6K
48
903
2K
716 Sep
1
Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.
Engagement rate per post
0.40%21 Apr
2.89%20 Jun
0.99%21 Jun
0.20%24 Jun
11.11%30 Jun
0.45%15 Sep
1.50%
1.64%
2.47%
2.08%
1.66%
0.60%
0.00%16 Sep
0.00%
Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.
What the audience does
Likes76.9%623 in total
Reposts10.7%87 in total
Replies5.8%47 in total
Quotes1.2%10 in total
Bookmarks5.3%43 in total
Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.
The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.
Contas semelhantes
pulseby_M ✓
@pulseby_M
38.2K followers
· 112.1K posts
Harsh Upadhyay ✓
@upadhyay_harsh1
38.2K followers
· 35K posts
Molifeng
@AyandaMVP
38.2K followers
· 32.1K posts
Big Noon Kickoff ✓
@BNKonFOX
38.2K followers
· 3.5K posts
Jacob Shamsian ⚖️
@JayShams
38.2K followers
· 37.8K posts
Dr Guy Karema, PhD ✓
@guykarema
38.2K followers
· 3.1K posts
Roush Yates Engines ✓
@roushyates
38.2K followers
· 30.8K posts
فلاح بن محمدالشهراني ✓
@falah995
38.2K followers
· 9.4K posts