Breakthrough ✓

@TheBTI · Berkeley, CA · joined 24 Jul 2009

Breakthrough Institute is a global research center seeking technological solutions to environmental challenges. Subscribe: https://t.co/plFVR4poOL

20 405Followers

2 509Following

20 198Posts total

2.9KViews on collected posts

Posts recentes

Breakthrough ✓@TheBTI18 Sep

"Georgia Power said it spent $3.53 billion in interest on its portion of Vogtle 3 & 4, and it owned only 46 percent of the project, meaning that interest costs approached 20 percent of its expense." The latest from @MattLWald: https://t.co/7qnOSGAp12 https://t.co/lyYW1YNN1G

668 views · 3 likes · 6 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Breakthrough ✓@TheBTI16 Sep

"Despite the alarmism from Mother Jones, glyphosate use in California and the rest of our National Forests is vanishingly small... and is crucial to conducting the forest management projects needed to mitigate wildfire risk and protect ecosystems from invasive species." From htt

627 views · 7 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Breakthrough ✓@TheBTI14 Sep

"By DOE’s own model, all five sites passed the safety test with large margins. What the ranking actually adjudicated, under guidelines that required safety to carry the greater weight, was a pair of unmeasured construction estimates. A decision made on cost is a decision not made 597 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Breakthrough ✓@TheBTI11 Sep

"Utilities should still be responsible for their negligence—when a utility acts carelessly, its shareholders should pay. But shifting the residual risk of building in fire-prone areas onto ratepayers a hundred miles away is neither fair nor efficient." Read @lrntex: 580 views · 1 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Breakthrough ✓@TheBTI10 Sep

"The comments implicitly carry the idea that reforming the rules means increasing nuclear risk. In fact, the changes pave the way for a generation of nuclear technology that is inherently safer." Read the latest Nuclear Notes: https://t.co/OWkNF4BRCK https://t.co/bEw55QJwcB

396 views · 4 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

5 posts dos últimos 90 dias, ao lado da faixa de 10K–100K seguidores. bem na mediana da sua faixa de seguidores.

Mediana de visualizações597esta conta924mediana para 10K–100K

Alcance, %2.93%esta conta3.62%mediana para 10K–100K

Engajamento, %1.26%esta conta1.52%mediana para 10K–100K

Métrica	Esta conta	Mediana para 10K–100K	Proporção
Mediana de visualizações por post	597	924	0.65×
Alcance (visualizações ÷ seguidores)	2.93%	3.62%	0.81×
Taxa de engajamento	1.26%	1.52%	0.83×

Outras contas desta faixa → Comparar com outra conta → Como estas referências são construídas →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

39610 Sep

58011 Sep

59714 Sep

62716 Sep

66818 Sep

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.26%10 Sep

0.34%11 Sep

0.34%14 Sep

1.44%16 Sep

1.35%18 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes56.7%17 in total

Reposts33.3%10 in total

Bookmarks10.0%3 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.