Gavin Andresen ✓

@gavinandresen · Keene, NH · joined 12 May 2010

Working on RiskiPedia

176 223Followers

316Following

2 584Posts total

62.1KViews on collected posts

Posts recentes

Gavin Andresen ✓@gavinandresen15 Aug

“Technical” analysis is homeopathic investing. There is no reason to think it will work, and no evidence it DOES work. 7.1K views · 29 likes · 1 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →

Gavin Andresen ✓@gavinandresen16 Jul

I see three good reasons to throw money into a prediction market: 1. You have knowledge the rest of the market doesn’t have and can expect to make a profit. 2. You are hedging to minimize some risk. 3. Just for excitement/fun. Most people are 3 (but think they’re 1) 4.9K views · 43 likes · 11 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →

Gavin Andresen ✓@gavinandresen20 Mar

About 111 million us citizens pay federal taxes. If the pentagon gets $200B , that’s $1,800 per taxpayer. Do you feel $1,800 safer from the Iran war? 9.2K views · 47 likes · 10 reposts · 23 replies Open on X →

Gavin Andresen ✓@gavinandresen19 Jan

I’m extremely skeptical of anybody who uses the phrase ‘epistemic humility’. They’re saying “I’m really quite humble, I’m not a know-it-all”… but also “look at these big-ass fancy words I know!!!” 16.2K views · 100 likes · 4 reposts · 28 replies Open on X →

Gavin Andresen ✓@gavinandresen17 Jan

@gavinandresen so you never had much sex in your life? what happened? 328 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Gavin Andresen ✓@gavinandresen16 Jan

@gavinandresen Bitcoin Cash fixes this 258 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Gavin Andresen ✓@gavinandresen16 Jan

@gavinandresen 1. What? 1.3K views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Gavin Andresen ✓@gavinandresen16 Jan

I learned a lot about fertility and birth control working on the RiskiPedia pregnancy page. Three things I didn't know that surprised me: 1. Unprotected sex between two young, fertile people at the peak of the women's cycle has about a 1 in 3 chance of resulting in pregnancy. 22.7K views · 110 likes · 6 reposts · 18 replies Open on X →

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

1 posts dos últimos 90 dias, ao lado da faixa de 100K–1M seguidores. aparece para muita gente, mas poucos desses espectadores reagem.

Mediana de visualizações7 142esta conta5 983mediana para 100K–1M

Alcance, %4.05%esta conta1.49%mediana para 100K–1M

Engajamento, %0.50%esta conta0.93%mediana para 100K–1M

Métrica	Esta conta	Mediana para 100K–1M	Proporção
Mediana de visualizações por post	7 142	5 983	1.19×
Alcance (visualizações ÷ seguidores)	4.05%	1.49%	2.72×
Taxa de engajamento	0.50%	0.93%	0.54×

Outras contas desta faixa → Comparar com outra conta → Como estas referências são construídas →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

22.7K16 Jan

1.3K

258

32817 Jan

16.2K19 Jan

9.2K20 Mar

4.9K16 Jul

7.1K15 Aug

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.60%16 Jan

0.63%

0.78%

0.30%17 Jan

0.82%19 Jan

0.91%20 Mar

1.31%16 Jul

0.50%15 Aug

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes67.3%340 in total

Reposts6.3%32 in total

Replies16.8%85 in total

Quotes1.6%8 in total

Bookmarks7.9%40 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Posts recentes

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Contas semelhantes