Rob Carver

@investingidiocy · England, United Kingdom · joined 20 Jan 2013

Overfits for LOLs: Systematic trader, author*5, Dad^3, blogger, lecturer@QMUL, advisor@stylus.digital, ex-HF&IB, quan(tish), leftie, pythonista, sailor & MAMIL

25 968Followers

374Following

13 426Posts total

18.6KViews on collected posts

Posts recentes

Rob Carver@investingidiocy9 Sep

"Systematic trading does NOT mean blindly taking every setup." OK, it's fine to use a mixture of discretionary and systematic methods but the dictionary definition of systematic is literally that you do exactly what the system says. You can't just change the dictionary. 6.1K views · 34 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Rob Carver@investingidiocy9 Sep

If you can't test it because its not perfectly systematic that's cool but then you can't teach it and you can't sell it and nobody should pay any attention to you just go away and make money, good luck to you. 3.7K views · 28 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Rob Carver@investingidiocy9 Sep

Clearly if reliable means trusting it will do it and be 100% accurate, of course the answer has to be no. Do you really want vibe code running your tax or benefits systems? Or missile guidance? The stakes are much higher with government software than some pointless toy app. 2K views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Rob Carver@investingidiocy9 Sep

I have an open source project that I'm no longer supporting. The awfulness of dealing with AI generated PR is one of the main reasons. 2.3K views · 8 likes · 1 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Rob Carver@investingidiocy4 Sep

I wrote a blogpost about a book I wrote https://t.co/AsBf8Xn0I1 4.4K views · 22 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

5 posts dos últimos 90 dias, ao lado da faixa de 10K–100K seguidores. aparece para muita gente, mas poucos desses espectadores reagem.

Mediana de visualizações3 707esta conta924mediana para 10K–100K

Alcance, %14.28%esta conta3.62%mediana para 10K–100K

Engajamento, %0.54%esta conta1.52%mediana para 10K–100K

Métrica	Esta conta	Mediana para 10K–100K	Proporção
Mediana de visualizações por post	3 707	924	4.01×
Alcance (visualizações ÷ seguidores)	14.28%	3.62%	3.94×
Taxa de engajamento	0.54%	1.52%	0.36×

Outras contas desta faixa → Comparar com outra conta → Como estas referências são construídas →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

4.4K4 Sep

2.3K9 Sep

3.7K

6.1K

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.54%4 Sep

0.52%9 Sep

0.35%

0.84%

0.60%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes70.3%97 in total

Reposts2.2%3 in total

Replies6.5%9 in total

Quotes1.4%2 in total

Bookmarks19.6%27 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Posts recentes

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Contas semelhantes