(((James Acton)))

@james_acton32 · Washington, DC · joined 04 Mar 2012

Co-director, @carnegienpp and senior fellow, @CarnegieEndow; nuclear policy, national security & politics; occasional agonizing about @Nationals; RT≠E etc.

25 137Followers

656Following

11 723Posts total

130.1KViews on collected posts

Posts recentes

(((James Acton)))@james_acton3231 Aug

Daisy (1964). LBJ knew how to do memorable. (Watch it...) https://t.co/5jCKoHj8KE https://t.co/SNbPLIeBMQ

GIF

1.3K views · 3 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

(((James Acton)))@james_acton3228 Aug

Global shock and terror would be the point. The goal would be coercion, not military effect. 8.7K views · 16 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

(((James Acton)))@james_acton3228 Aug

@james_acton32 Veracity of the reports on nuclear use aside, serious question: what would use of an nuclear weapon achieve? Other than global shock and terror (and perhaps that would be the purpose) how would it help RU achieve its military goals against UKR? I've never seen th 3.1K views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

(((James Acton)))@james_acton3227 Aug

I worried about Russian nuclear use earlier in this war, and if things go badly enough for Russia, I wouldn’t exclude that possibility. But they’d have to go *really* badly: Putin at risk of losing Crimea or his hold on power badly. That’s not the situation today. (1/n) 11.4K views · 67 likes · 9 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

(((James Acton)))@james_acton3227 Aug

Genuinely stunning contrail. A parabolic cycloid. 25.3K views · 78 likes · 3 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

(((James Acton)))@james_acton3219 Jun 2025

In the @nytimes today, I argue that the United States should judge military action against Iran by the same standards against which the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action--aka the Iran Nuclear Deal--was assessed. GIFT LINK at end of thread. (1/7) https://t.co/moUM6RFDJI

80.3K views · 235 likes · 79 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

5 posts dos últimos 90 dias, ao lado da faixa de 10K–100K seguidores. aparece para muita gente, mas poucos desses espectadores reagem.

Mediana de visualizações8 690esta conta924mediana para 10K–100K

Alcance, %34.57%esta conta3.62%mediana para 10K–100K

Engajamento, %0.33%esta conta1.52%mediana para 10K–100K

Métrica	Esta conta	Mediana para 10K–100K	Proporção
Mediana de visualizações por post	8 690	924	9.40×
Alcance (visualizações ÷ seguidores)	34.57%	3.62%	9.55×
Taxa de engajamento	0.33%	1.52%	0.22×

Outras contas desta faixa → Comparar com outra conta → Como estas referências são construídas →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

80.3K19 Jun

25.3K27 Aug

11.4K

3.1K28 Aug

8.7K

1.3K31 Aug

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.42%19 Jun

0.33%27 Aug

0.69%

0.20%28 Aug

0.23%

0.45%31 Aug

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes60.0%401 in total

Reposts14.1%94 in total

Replies2.5%17 in total

Quotes2.4%16 in total

Bookmarks21.0%140 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.